Cargando…

Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients

Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) on outcomes of patients who suffered from small bowel perforations following a penetrating mechanism and presented with initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg. Methods Data from 2012-2014 from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Nasim, Kuo, Yen-Hong, Lepis, Grace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6022
_version_ 1783474908310798336
author Ahmed, Nasim
Kuo, Yen-Hong
Lepis, Grace
author_facet Ahmed, Nasim
Kuo, Yen-Hong
Lepis, Grace
author_sort Ahmed, Nasim
collection PubMed
description Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) on outcomes of patients who suffered from small bowel perforations following a penetrating mechanism and presented with initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg. Methods Data from 2012-2014 from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data set was accessed for this study. All patients who presented with initial SBP <90 mmHg and sustained perforated small bowel injury after a penetrating mechanism and were taken for EL within four hours of the patient’s arrival to the hospital were included in the study. Data were categorized into early group, if the EL was performed within an hour and late group, and if EL was done 1-4 hours of patient arrival to the hospital. Results Out of 360, approximately 89% of patients underwent EL within an hour and 11% of patients underwent EL within 1-4 hours of hospital arrival. The median (IQR) time of the late laparotomy was two (2, 3) hours. After propensity matching, there were no significance differences found between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality (11 (26.8%) vs 8 (19.5%), P = 0.54), total hospital length of stay (median and IQR 20 (17, 25) vs 15 (11, 20), P = 0.117), discharge to home without services (67% vs. 82%, P = 0.28), and post-operative complications. Conclusion EL in perforated small bowel injury in unstable patients needs to be performed as soon as possible. EL performed within the median of two hours’ time may be acceptable in certain circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68866582019-12-10 Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients Ahmed, Nasim Kuo, Yen-Hong Lepis, Grace Cureus Trauma Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) on outcomes of patients who suffered from small bowel perforations following a penetrating mechanism and presented with initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg. Methods Data from 2012-2014 from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data set was accessed for this study. All patients who presented with initial SBP <90 mmHg and sustained perforated small bowel injury after a penetrating mechanism and were taken for EL within four hours of the patient’s arrival to the hospital were included in the study. Data were categorized into early group, if the EL was performed within an hour and late group, and if EL was done 1-4 hours of patient arrival to the hospital. Results Out of 360, approximately 89% of patients underwent EL within an hour and 11% of patients underwent EL within 1-4 hours of hospital arrival. The median (IQR) time of the late laparotomy was two (2, 3) hours. After propensity matching, there were no significance differences found between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality (11 (26.8%) vs 8 (19.5%), P = 0.54), total hospital length of stay (median and IQR 20 (17, 25) vs 15 (11, 20), P = 0.117), discharge to home without services (67% vs. 82%, P = 0.28), and post-operative complications. Conclusion EL in perforated small bowel injury in unstable patients needs to be performed as soon as possible. EL performed within the median of two hours’ time may be acceptable in certain circumstances. Cureus 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6886658/ /pubmed/31824790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6022 Text en Copyright © 2019, Ahmed et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Trauma
Ahmed, Nasim
Kuo, Yen-Hong
Lepis, Grace
Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title_full Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title_fullStr Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title_short Emergency Laparotomy and Outcomes in Penetrating Small Bowel Perforation in Unstable Patients
title_sort emergency laparotomy and outcomes in penetrating small bowel perforation in unstable patients
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6022
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmednasim emergencylaparotomyandoutcomesinpenetratingsmallbowelperforationinunstablepatients
AT kuoyenhong emergencylaparotomyandoutcomesinpenetratingsmallbowelperforationinunstablepatients
AT lepisgrace emergencylaparotomyandoutcomesinpenetratingsmallbowelperforationinunstablepatients