Cargando…

Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise

Hearing in noisy environments is a complicated task that engages attention, memory, linguistic knowledge, and precise auditory-neurophysiological processing of sound. Accumulating evidence in school-aged children and adults suggests these mechanisms vary with the task’s demands. For instance, co-loc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Elaine C., Krizman, Jennifer, White-Schwoch, Travis, Nicol, Trent, Estabrook, Ryne, Kraus, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100672
_version_ 1783474909272342528
author Thompson, Elaine C.
Krizman, Jennifer
White-Schwoch, Travis
Nicol, Trent
Estabrook, Ryne
Kraus, Nina
author_facet Thompson, Elaine C.
Krizman, Jennifer
White-Schwoch, Travis
Nicol, Trent
Estabrook, Ryne
Kraus, Nina
author_sort Thompson, Elaine C.
collection PubMed
description Hearing in noisy environments is a complicated task that engages attention, memory, linguistic knowledge, and precise auditory-neurophysiological processing of sound. Accumulating evidence in school-aged children and adults suggests these mechanisms vary with the task’s demands. For instance, co-located speech and noise demands a large cognitive load and recruits working memory, while spatially separating speech and noise diminishes this load and draws on alternative skills. Past research has focused on one or two mechanisms underlying speech-in-noise perception in isolation; few studies have considered multiple factors in tandem, or how they interact during critical developmental years. This project sought to test complementary hypotheses involving neurophysiological, cognitive, and linguistic processes supporting speech-in-noise perception in young children under different masking conditions (co-located, spatially separated). Structural equation modeling was used to identify latent constructs and examine their contributions as predictors. Results reveal cognitive and language skills operate as a single factor supporting speech-in-noise perception under different masking conditions. While neural coding of the F0 supports perception in both co-located and spatially separated conditions, neural timing predicts perception of spatially separated listening exclusively. Together, these results suggest co-located and spatially separated speech-in-noise perception draw on similar cognitive/linguistic skills, but distinct neural factors, in early childhood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68866642019-12-03 Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise Thompson, Elaine C. Krizman, Jennifer White-Schwoch, Travis Nicol, Trent Estabrook, Ryne Kraus, Nina Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Hearing in noisy environments is a complicated task that engages attention, memory, linguistic knowledge, and precise auditory-neurophysiological processing of sound. Accumulating evidence in school-aged children and adults suggests these mechanisms vary with the task’s demands. For instance, co-located speech and noise demands a large cognitive load and recruits working memory, while spatially separating speech and noise diminishes this load and draws on alternative skills. Past research has focused on one or two mechanisms underlying speech-in-noise perception in isolation; few studies have considered multiple factors in tandem, or how they interact during critical developmental years. This project sought to test complementary hypotheses involving neurophysiological, cognitive, and linguistic processes supporting speech-in-noise perception in young children under different masking conditions (co-located, spatially separated). Structural equation modeling was used to identify latent constructs and examine their contributions as predictors. Results reveal cognitive and language skills operate as a single factor supporting speech-in-noise perception under different masking conditions. While neural coding of the F0 supports perception in both co-located and spatially separated conditions, neural timing predicts perception of spatially separated listening exclusively. Together, these results suggest co-located and spatially separated speech-in-noise perception draw on similar cognitive/linguistic skills, but distinct neural factors, in early childhood. Elsevier 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6886664/ /pubmed/31430627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100672 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Thompson, Elaine C.
Krizman, Jennifer
White-Schwoch, Travis
Nicol, Trent
Estabrook, Ryne
Kraus, Nina
Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title_full Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title_fullStr Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title_short Neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
title_sort neurophysiological, linguistic, and cognitive predictors of children’s ability to perceive speech in noise
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100672
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonelainec neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise
AT krizmanjennifer neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise
AT whiteschwochtravis neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise
AT nicoltrent neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise
AT estabrookryne neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise
AT krausnina neurophysiologicallinguisticandcognitivepredictorsofchildrensabilitytoperceivespeechinnoise