Cargando…

Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales

OBJECTIVES: Primary: describe uptake of new implant components (femoral stem or acetabular cup/shell) for total hip replacements (THRs) in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR). Secondary: compare the characteristics of: (a) surgeons and (b) patients who used/received new rather th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penfold, Chris M, Blom, Ashley W, Sayers, Adrian, Wilkinson, J Mark, Hunt, Linda, Judge, Andrew, Whitehouse, Michael R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029572
_version_ 1783474953366011904
author Penfold, Chris M
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
Wilkinson, J Mark
Hunt, Linda
Judge, Andrew
Whitehouse, Michael R
author_facet Penfold, Chris M
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
Wilkinson, J Mark
Hunt, Linda
Judge, Andrew
Whitehouse, Michael R
author_sort Penfold, Chris M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Primary: describe uptake of new implant components (femoral stem or acetabular cup/shell) for total hip replacements (THRs) in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR). Secondary: compare the characteristics of: (a) surgeons and (b) patients who used/received new rather than established components. DESIGN: Cohort of 618 393 primary THRs performed for osteoarthritis (±other indications) by 4979 surgeons between 2008 and 2017 in England and Wales from the NJR. We described the uptake of new (first recorded use >2008, used within 5 years) stems/cups, and variation in uptake by surgeons (primary objectives). We explored surgeon-level and patient-level factors associated with use/receipt of new components with logistic regression models (secondary objectives). OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes: total number of new cups/stems, proportion of operations using new versus established components. Secondary outcomes: odds of: (a) a surgeon using a new cup/stem in a calendar-year, (b) a patient receiving a new rather than established cup/stem. RESULTS: Sixty-eight new cups and 72 new stems were used in 47 606 primary THRs (7.7%) by 2005 surgeons (40.3%) 2008–2017. Surgeons used a median of one new stem and cup (25%–75%=1–2 both, max=10 cups, max=8 stems). Surgeons performed a median total of 22 THRs (25%–75%=5–124, range=1–3938) in the period 2008–2017. Surgeons used new stems in a median of 5.0% (25%–75%=1.3%–16.1%) and new cups in a median of 9.4% (25%–75%=2.8%–26.7%) of their THRs. Patients aged <55 years old versus those 55–80 had higher odds of receiving a new rather than established stem (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.73–1.93) and cup (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.25–1.37). Women had lower odds of receiving a new stem (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.84–0.90), higher odds of receiving a new cup (OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.03–1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of new THR components have been introduced in the NJR since 2008. 40% of surgeons have tried new components, with wide variation in how many types and frequency they have been used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68869382019-12-04 Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales Penfold, Chris M Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian Wilkinson, J Mark Hunt, Linda Judge, Andrew Whitehouse, Michael R BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: Primary: describe uptake of new implant components (femoral stem or acetabular cup/shell) for total hip replacements (THRs) in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR). Secondary: compare the characteristics of: (a) surgeons and (b) patients who used/received new rather than established components. DESIGN: Cohort of 618 393 primary THRs performed for osteoarthritis (±other indications) by 4979 surgeons between 2008 and 2017 in England and Wales from the NJR. We described the uptake of new (first recorded use >2008, used within 5 years) stems/cups, and variation in uptake by surgeons (primary objectives). We explored surgeon-level and patient-level factors associated with use/receipt of new components with logistic regression models (secondary objectives). OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes: total number of new cups/stems, proportion of operations using new versus established components. Secondary outcomes: odds of: (a) a surgeon using a new cup/stem in a calendar-year, (b) a patient receiving a new rather than established cup/stem. RESULTS: Sixty-eight new cups and 72 new stems were used in 47 606 primary THRs (7.7%) by 2005 surgeons (40.3%) 2008–2017. Surgeons used a median of one new stem and cup (25%–75%=1–2 both, max=10 cups, max=8 stems). Surgeons performed a median total of 22 THRs (25%–75%=5–124, range=1–3938) in the period 2008–2017. Surgeons used new stems in a median of 5.0% (25%–75%=1.3%–16.1%) and new cups in a median of 9.4% (25%–75%=2.8%–26.7%) of their THRs. Patients aged <55 years old versus those 55–80 had higher odds of receiving a new rather than established stem (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.73–1.93) and cup (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.25–1.37). Women had lower odds of receiving a new stem (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.84–0.90), higher odds of receiving a new cup (OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.03–1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of new THR components have been introduced in the NJR since 2008. 40% of surgeons have tried new components, with wide variation in how many types and frequency they have been used. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6886938/ /pubmed/31772087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029572 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Penfold, Chris M
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
Wilkinson, J Mark
Hunt, Linda
Judge, Andrew
Whitehouse, Michael R
Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title_full Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title_fullStr Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title_short Understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the UK: a cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
title_sort understanding the uptake of new hip replacement implants in the uk: a cohort study using data from the national joint registry for england and wales
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029572
work_keys_str_mv AT penfoldchrism understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT blomashleyw understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT sayersadrian understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT wilkinsonjmark understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT huntlinda understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT judgeandrew understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales
AT whitehousemichaelr understandingtheuptakeofnewhipreplacementimplantsintheukacohortstudyusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryforenglandandwales