Cargando…

Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment

INTRODUCTION: Choosing Wisely, an international effort to reduce low value care worldwide, considers communication between clinicians and patients during routine clinical encounters a key mechanism for change. In Australia, Choosing Wisely has developed a 5 Questions resource to facilitate better co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muscat, Danielle Marie, Chang, Edward Hoi-fan, Thompson, Rachel, Cvejic, Erin, Tracy, Marguerite, Zadro, Joshua, Smith, Jessica Kathleen, Lindner, Robyn, McCaffery, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033126
_version_ 1783474954538319872
author Muscat, Danielle Marie
Chang, Edward Hoi-fan
Thompson, Rachel
Cvejic, Erin
Tracy, Marguerite
Zadro, Joshua
Smith, Jessica Kathleen
Lindner, Robyn
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_facet Muscat, Danielle Marie
Chang, Edward Hoi-fan
Thompson, Rachel
Cvejic, Erin
Tracy, Marguerite
Zadro, Joshua
Smith, Jessica Kathleen
Lindner, Robyn
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_sort Muscat, Danielle Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Choosing Wisely, an international effort to reduce low value care worldwide, considers communication between clinicians and patients during routine clinical encounters a key mechanism for change. In Australia, Choosing Wisely has developed a 5 Questions resource to facilitate better conversations. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a video designed to prepare patients for question-asking and participation in shared decision-making on (a) self-efficacy to ask questions and participate in shared decision-making, (b) intention to participate in shared decision-making and (c) a range of secondary outcomes. The secondary aim of this study is to determine whether participants’ health literacy modifies the effects of the interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design (preparation video: yes, no × Choosing Wisely 5 Questions resource: yes, no × health literacy: adequate, inadequate). Participants will be recruited by an online market research company, presented with a hypothetical non-specific low back pain scenario, and randomised to study groups stratified by health literacy. Quantitative primary and secondary outcome data will be analysed as intention-to-treat using appropriate regression models (ie, linear regression for continuous outcomes, logistic regression for dichotomous categorical outcomes). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol number: 2018/965). The results from this work will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, conferences and updates with collaborating public health bodies. Resources developed for this study will be made available to patients and clinicians following trial completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (trial number: 376477) and the stage is Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68869432019-12-04 Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment Muscat, Danielle Marie Chang, Edward Hoi-fan Thompson, Rachel Cvejic, Erin Tracy, Marguerite Zadro, Joshua Smith, Jessica Kathleen Lindner, Robyn McCaffery, Kirsten BMJ Open Communication INTRODUCTION: Choosing Wisely, an international effort to reduce low value care worldwide, considers communication between clinicians and patients during routine clinical encounters a key mechanism for change. In Australia, Choosing Wisely has developed a 5 Questions resource to facilitate better conversations. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a video designed to prepare patients for question-asking and participation in shared decision-making on (a) self-efficacy to ask questions and participate in shared decision-making, (b) intention to participate in shared decision-making and (c) a range of secondary outcomes. The secondary aim of this study is to determine whether participants’ health literacy modifies the effects of the interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design (preparation video: yes, no × Choosing Wisely 5 Questions resource: yes, no × health literacy: adequate, inadequate). Participants will be recruited by an online market research company, presented with a hypothetical non-specific low back pain scenario, and randomised to study groups stratified by health literacy. Quantitative primary and secondary outcome data will be analysed as intention-to-treat using appropriate regression models (ie, linear regression for continuous outcomes, logistic regression for dichotomous categorical outcomes). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol number: 2018/965). The results from this work will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, conferences and updates with collaborating public health bodies. Resources developed for this study will be made available to patients and clinicians following trial completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (trial number: 376477) and the stage is Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6886943/ /pubmed/31727667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033126 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Communication
Muscat, Danielle Marie
Chang, Edward Hoi-fan
Thompson, Rachel
Cvejic, Erin
Tracy, Marguerite
Zadro, Joshua
Smith, Jessica Kathleen
Lindner, Robyn
McCaffery, Kirsten
Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title_full Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title_short Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
title_sort evaluation of the choosing wisely australia 5 questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033126
work_keys_str_mv AT muscatdaniellemarie evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT changedwardhoifan evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT thompsonrachel evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT cvejicerin evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT tracymarguerite evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT zadrojoshua evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT smithjessicakathleen evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT lindnerrobyn evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment
AT mccafferykirsten evaluationofthechoosingwiselyaustralia5questionsresourceandashareddecisionmakingpreparationvideoprotocolforanonlineexperiment