Cargando…

Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Patient experience is being widely considered in the evaluation of healthcare service quality, which is a key target for public hospitals under China’s New Healthcare Reform. This study aimed to illustrate patients’ experiences in county-level public hospitals, and identify aspects that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Rui, Li, Lu, Zi, Chunyan, Fang, Pengqian, Wang, Biyan, Tang, Changmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225
_version_ 1783474959068168192
author Min, Rui
Li, Lu
Zi, Chunyan
Fang, Pengqian
Wang, Biyan
Tang, Changmin
author_facet Min, Rui
Li, Lu
Zi, Chunyan
Fang, Pengqian
Wang, Biyan
Tang, Changmin
author_sort Min, Rui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient experience is being widely considered in the evaluation of healthcare service quality, which is a key target for public hospitals under China’s New Healthcare Reform. This study aimed to illustrate patients’ experiences in county-level public hospitals, and identify aspects that need to be improved. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2016 and 2018, a cross-sectional study with 500 outpatients and 800 inpatients was conducted in 10 county-level public hospitals from Shandong Province, Hubei Province and Chongqing Municipality. METHOD: A three-part questionnaire was used to evaluate patients’ experiences during their visits to hospitals. It comprised a questionnaire for basic information, the Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) Questionnaire and the overall evaluation (a 3-point Likert scale to express patients’ satisfaction and patient loyalty). Patients’ experiences were classified according to six dimensions (information transmission and patient education, respect for patient preference, emotional support, physical comfort, involvement of family or friends and continuity of medical service). Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate patient experience. RESULTS: A total of 1241 valid questionnaires were analysed. The mean PPE-15 score was 41.33 (range, 23–56). The better the patient experience and satisfaction, the higher the patient loyalty (p<0.001). Except for hospital disparities, patients’ age and occupation status had a significant impact on patient experience (p<0.05). Of the six dimensions, the physical comfort score was the highest, while the respect for patient preference score was the lowest. Additionally, a strong correlation was found between the respect for patient preference dimension and patients’ overall satisfaction with their treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital managers and staff members should pay close attention to the preferences of patients and their families to improve patient experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6886962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68869622019-12-04 Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study Min, Rui Li, Lu Zi, Chunyan Fang, Pengqian Wang, Biyan Tang, Changmin BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Patient experience is being widely considered in the evaluation of healthcare service quality, which is a key target for public hospitals under China’s New Healthcare Reform. This study aimed to illustrate patients’ experiences in county-level public hospitals, and identify aspects that need to be improved. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2016 and 2018, a cross-sectional study with 500 outpatients and 800 inpatients was conducted in 10 county-level public hospitals from Shandong Province, Hubei Province and Chongqing Municipality. METHOD: A three-part questionnaire was used to evaluate patients’ experiences during their visits to hospitals. It comprised a questionnaire for basic information, the Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) Questionnaire and the overall evaluation (a 3-point Likert scale to express patients’ satisfaction and patient loyalty). Patients’ experiences were classified according to six dimensions (information transmission and patient education, respect for patient preference, emotional support, physical comfort, involvement of family or friends and continuity of medical service). Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate patient experience. RESULTS: A total of 1241 valid questionnaires were analysed. The mean PPE-15 score was 41.33 (range, 23–56). The better the patient experience and satisfaction, the higher the patient loyalty (p<0.001). Except for hospital disparities, patients’ age and occupation status had a significant impact on patient experience (p<0.05). Of the six dimensions, the physical comfort score was the highest, while the respect for patient preference score was the lowest. Additionally, a strong correlation was found between the respect for patient preference dimension and patients’ overall satisfaction with their treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital managers and staff members should pay close attention to the preferences of patients and their families to improve patient experience. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6886962/ /pubmed/31727670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Min, Rui
Li, Lu
Zi, Chunyan
Fang, Pengqian
Wang, Biyan
Tang, Changmin
Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title_full Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title_short Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
title_sort evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in china: a multicentred, cross-sectional study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225
work_keys_str_mv AT minrui evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy
AT lilu evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy
AT zichunyan evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy
AT fangpengqian evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy
AT wangbiyan evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy
AT tangchangmin evaluationofpatientexperienceincountylevelpublichospitalsinchinaamulticentredcrosssectionalstudy