Cargando…
Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study
OBJECTIVE: ‘Core information sets’ (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. DESIGN: Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic lite...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028623 |
_version_ | 1783474966644129792 |
---|---|
author | McNair, Angus G K Whistance, Robert N Main, Barry Forsythe, Rachael Macefield, Rhiannon Rees, Jonathan Pullyblank, Anne Avery, Kerry Brookes, Sara Thomas, Michael G Sylvester, Paul A Russell, Ann Oliver, Alfred Morton, Dion Kennedy, Robin Jayne, David Huxtable, Richard Hackett, Roland Dutton, Susan Coleman, Mark G Card, Mia Brown, Julia Blazeby, Jane |
author_facet | McNair, Angus G K Whistance, Robert N Main, Barry Forsythe, Rachael Macefield, Rhiannon Rees, Jonathan Pullyblank, Anne Avery, Kerry Brookes, Sara Thomas, Michael G Sylvester, Paul A Russell, Ann Oliver, Alfred Morton, Dion Kennedy, Robin Jayne, David Huxtable, Richard Hackett, Roland Dutton, Susan Coleman, Mark G Card, Mia Brown, Julia Blazeby, Jane |
author_sort | McNair, Angus G K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: ‘Core information sets’ (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. DESIGN: Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic literature reviews and patient interviews to identify potential information of importance to patients, (2) UK national Delphi survey of patients and professionals to rate the importance of the information, (3) international consensus meeting to agree on the final CIS. SETTING: UK CRC centres. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling was conducted to ensure CRC centre representation based upon geographical region and caseload volume. Responses were received from 63/81 (78%) centres (90 professionals). Adult patients who had undergone CRC surgery were eligible, and purposive sampling was conducted to ensure representation based on age, sex and cancer location (rectum, left and right colon). Responses were received from 97/267 (35%) patients with a wide age range (29–87), equal sex ratio and cancer location. Attendees of the international Tripartite Colorectal Conference were eligible for the consensus meeting. OUTCOMES: Phase 1: Information of potential importance to patients was extracted verbatim and operationalised into a Delphi questionnaire. Phase 2: Patients and professionals rated the importance information on a 9-point Likert scale, and resurveyed following group feedback. Information rated of low importance were discarded using predefined criteria. Phase 3: A modified nominal group technique was used to gain final consensus in separate consensus meetings with patients and professionals. RESULTS: Data sources identified 1216 pieces of information that informed a 98-item questionnaire. Analysis led to 50 and 23 information domains being retained after the first and second surveys, respectively. The final CIS included 11 concepts including specific surgical complications, short and long-term survival, disease recurrence, stoma and quality of life issues. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established a CIS for professionals to discuss with patients before CRC surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6886994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68869942019-12-04 Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study McNair, Angus G K Whistance, Robert N Main, Barry Forsythe, Rachael Macefield, Rhiannon Rees, Jonathan Pullyblank, Anne Avery, Kerry Brookes, Sara Thomas, Michael G Sylvester, Paul A Russell, Ann Oliver, Alfred Morton, Dion Kennedy, Robin Jayne, David Huxtable, Richard Hackett, Roland Dutton, Susan Coleman, Mark G Card, Mia Brown, Julia Blazeby, Jane BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: ‘Core information sets’ (CISs) represent baseline information, agreed by patients and professionals, to stimulate individualised patient-centred discussions. This study developed a CIS for use before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. DESIGN: Three phase consensus study: (1) Systematic literature reviews and patient interviews to identify potential information of importance to patients, (2) UK national Delphi survey of patients and professionals to rate the importance of the information, (3) international consensus meeting to agree on the final CIS. SETTING: UK CRC centres. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling was conducted to ensure CRC centre representation based upon geographical region and caseload volume. Responses were received from 63/81 (78%) centres (90 professionals). Adult patients who had undergone CRC surgery were eligible, and purposive sampling was conducted to ensure representation based on age, sex and cancer location (rectum, left and right colon). Responses were received from 97/267 (35%) patients with a wide age range (29–87), equal sex ratio and cancer location. Attendees of the international Tripartite Colorectal Conference were eligible for the consensus meeting. OUTCOMES: Phase 1: Information of potential importance to patients was extracted verbatim and operationalised into a Delphi questionnaire. Phase 2: Patients and professionals rated the importance information on a 9-point Likert scale, and resurveyed following group feedback. Information rated of low importance were discarded using predefined criteria. Phase 3: A modified nominal group technique was used to gain final consensus in separate consensus meetings with patients and professionals. RESULTS: Data sources identified 1216 pieces of information that informed a 98-item questionnaire. Analysis led to 50 and 23 information domains being retained after the first and second surveys, respectively. The final CIS included 11 concepts including specific surgical complications, short and long-term survival, disease recurrence, stoma and quality of life issues. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established a CIS for professionals to discuss with patients before CRC surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6886994/ /pubmed/31727644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028623 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery McNair, Angus G K Whistance, Robert N Main, Barry Forsythe, Rachael Macefield, Rhiannon Rees, Jonathan Pullyblank, Anne Avery, Kerry Brookes, Sara Thomas, Michael G Sylvester, Paul A Russell, Ann Oliver, Alfred Morton, Dion Kennedy, Robin Jayne, David Huxtable, Richard Hackett, Roland Dutton, Susan Coleman, Mark G Card, Mia Brown, Julia Blazeby, Jane Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title | Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title_full | Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title_fullStr | Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title_short | Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
title_sort | development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnairangusgk developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT whistancerobertn developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT mainbarry developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT forsytherachael developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT macefieldrhiannon developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT reesjonathan developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT pullyblankanne developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT averykerry developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT brookessara developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT thomasmichaelg developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT sylvesterpaula developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT russellann developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT oliveralfred developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT mortondion developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT kennedyrobin developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT jaynedavid developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT huxtablerichard developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT hackettroland developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT duttonsusan developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT colemanmarkg developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT cardmia developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT brownjulia developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy AT blazebyjane developmentofacoreinformationsetforcolorectalcancersurgeryaconsensusstudy |