Cargando…

Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people

OBJECTIVES: Many suicides take place in public locations, usually involving jumping from high places or use of transport networks. Previous research has largely focused on the effectiveness of physical barriers at frequently used locations. There have been no studies of human intervention to prevent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owens, Christabel, Derges, Jane, Abraham, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032319
_version_ 1783474973352919040
author Owens, Christabel
Derges, Jane
Abraham, Charles
author_facet Owens, Christabel
Derges, Jane
Abraham, Charles
author_sort Owens, Christabel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many suicides take place in public locations, usually involving jumping from high places or use of transport networks. Previous research has largely focused on the effectiveness of physical barriers at frequently used locations. There have been no studies of human intervention to prevent suicides in public places. The aim of this study was to identify the core components of an effective intervention by a member of the public. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with people who have either been prevented by a stranger from taking their own life in a public location (n=12) or intervened to prevent a stranger from taking their own life in a public location (n=21). Collectively, the two groups narrated 50 incidents of suicide rescue. We analysed interview transcripts using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Suicidal people typically displayed no visible distress, describing themselves as being dissociated or ‘in a bubble’. Intervention was seen to involve three main tasks: ‘bursting the bubble’ (reconnecting with self, others and everyday world); moving to a safer location, and summoning help. We show how interveners accomplished these tasks in a range of ways, using both verbal and non-verbal communication and different degrees of restraint. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first empirical study to examine the role of passing strangers in preventing suicides in public places. It shows that no specialist skills are needed. Interveners were ordinary people, distinguished only by a high level of social awareness, combined with a readiness for social action. The findings also suggest that people do not need a script and should not be afraid of saying ‘the wrong thing.’ What interveners said was much less important than how they made the suicidal person feel, namely safe, connected and validated (‘I matter’). Interveners did this simply by being themselves, responding with authenticity, calmness and compassion. Members of the public need to be encouraged to recognise and reach out to those who may be at risk of suicide in public locations, but should be prepared for a prolonged and intense encounter that may leave them with troubling emotions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68870222019-12-04 Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people Owens, Christabel Derges, Jane Abraham, Charles BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Many suicides take place in public locations, usually involving jumping from high places or use of transport networks. Previous research has largely focused on the effectiveness of physical barriers at frequently used locations. There have been no studies of human intervention to prevent suicides in public places. The aim of this study was to identify the core components of an effective intervention by a member of the public. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with people who have either been prevented by a stranger from taking their own life in a public location (n=12) or intervened to prevent a stranger from taking their own life in a public location (n=21). Collectively, the two groups narrated 50 incidents of suicide rescue. We analysed interview transcripts using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Suicidal people typically displayed no visible distress, describing themselves as being dissociated or ‘in a bubble’. Intervention was seen to involve three main tasks: ‘bursting the bubble’ (reconnecting with self, others and everyday world); moving to a safer location, and summoning help. We show how interveners accomplished these tasks in a range of ways, using both verbal and non-verbal communication and different degrees of restraint. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first empirical study to examine the role of passing strangers in preventing suicides in public places. It shows that no specialist skills are needed. Interveners were ordinary people, distinguished only by a high level of social awareness, combined with a readiness for social action. The findings also suggest that people do not need a script and should not be afraid of saying ‘the wrong thing.’ What interveners said was much less important than how they made the suicidal person feel, namely safe, connected and validated (‘I matter’). Interveners did this simply by being themselves, responding with authenticity, calmness and compassion. Members of the public need to be encouraged to recognise and reach out to those who may be at risk of suicide in public locations, but should be prepared for a prolonged and intense encounter that may leave them with troubling emotions. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6887022/ /pubmed/31740473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032319 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Owens, Christabel
Derges, Jane
Abraham, Charles
Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title_full Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title_fullStr Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title_full_unstemmed Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title_short Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
title_sort intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032319
work_keys_str_mv AT owenschristabel interveningtopreventasuicideinapublicplaceaqualitativestudyofeffectiveinterventionsbylaypeople
AT dergesjane interveningtopreventasuicideinapublicplaceaqualitativestudyofeffectiveinterventionsbylaypeople
AT abrahamcharles interveningtopreventasuicideinapublicplaceaqualitativestudyofeffectiveinterventionsbylaypeople