Cargando…
Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorder...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408 |
_version_ | 1783474975042174976 |
---|---|
author | Heddaeus, Daniela Dirmaier, Jörg Brettschneider, Christian Daubmann, Anne Grochtdreis, Thomas von dem Knesebeck, Olaf König, Hans-Helmut Löwe, Bernd Maehder, Kerstin Porzelt, Sarah Rosenkranz, Moritz Schäfer, Ingo Scherer, Martin Schulte, Bernd Wegscheider, Karl Weigel, Angelika Werner, Silke Zimmermann, Thomas Härter, Martin |
author_facet | Heddaeus, Daniela Dirmaier, Jörg Brettschneider, Christian Daubmann, Anne Grochtdreis, Thomas von dem Knesebeck, Olaf König, Hans-Helmut Löwe, Bernd Maehder, Kerstin Porzelt, Sarah Rosenkranz, Moritz Schäfer, Ingo Scherer, Martin Schulte, Bernd Wegscheider, Karl Weigel, Angelika Werner, Silke Zimmermann, Thomas Härter, Martin |
author_sort | Heddaeus, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorders, comorbid mental disorders have rarely been addressed in such care models. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model for depressive, anxiety, somatoform and alcohol use disorders within a multiprofessional network compared with treatment as usual. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group superiority trial, n=570 patients will be recruited from primary care practices (n=19 practices per group). The intervention is a newly developed collaborative and stepped care model in which patients will be treated using treatment options of various intensities within an integrated network of outpatient general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychotherapists and inpatient institutions. It will be compared with treatment as usual with regard to effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility, with the primary outcome being a change in mental health-related quality of life from baseline to 6 months. Patients in both groups will undergo an assessment at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after study inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (No. PV5595) and will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For dissemination, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Within the superordinate research project Hamburg Network for Health Services Research, the results will be communicated to relevant stakeholders in mental healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03226743. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6887029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68870292019-12-04 Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care Heddaeus, Daniela Dirmaier, Jörg Brettschneider, Christian Daubmann, Anne Grochtdreis, Thomas von dem Knesebeck, Olaf König, Hans-Helmut Löwe, Bernd Maehder, Kerstin Porzelt, Sarah Rosenkranz, Moritz Schäfer, Ingo Scherer, Martin Schulte, Bernd Wegscheider, Karl Weigel, Angelika Werner, Silke Zimmermann, Thomas Härter, Martin BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorders, comorbid mental disorders have rarely been addressed in such care models. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model for depressive, anxiety, somatoform and alcohol use disorders within a multiprofessional network compared with treatment as usual. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group superiority trial, n=570 patients will be recruited from primary care practices (n=19 practices per group). The intervention is a newly developed collaborative and stepped care model in which patients will be treated using treatment options of various intensities within an integrated network of outpatient general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychotherapists and inpatient institutions. It will be compared with treatment as usual with regard to effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility, with the primary outcome being a change in mental health-related quality of life from baseline to 6 months. Patients in both groups will undergo an assessment at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after study inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (No. PV5595) and will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For dissemination, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Within the superordinate research project Hamburg Network for Health Services Research, the results will be communicated to relevant stakeholders in mental healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03226743. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6887029/ /pubmed/31767595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Heddaeus, Daniela Dirmaier, Jörg Brettschneider, Christian Daubmann, Anne Grochtdreis, Thomas von dem Knesebeck, Olaf König, Hans-Helmut Löwe, Bernd Maehder, Kerstin Porzelt, Sarah Rosenkranz, Moritz Schäfer, Ingo Scherer, Martin Schulte, Bernd Wegscheider, Karl Weigel, Angelika Werner, Silke Zimmermann, Thomas Härter, Martin Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title | Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title_full | Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title_short | Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
title_sort | study protocol for the comet study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heddaeusdaniela studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT dirmaierjorg studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT brettschneiderchristian studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT daubmannanne studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT grochtdreisthomas studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT vondemknesebeckolaf studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT konighanshelmut studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT lowebernd studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT maehderkerstin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT porzeltsarah studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT rosenkranzmoritz studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT schaferingo studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT scherermartin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT schultebernd studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT wegscheiderkarl studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT weigelangelika studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT wernersilke studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT zimmermannthomas studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare AT hartermartin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare |