Cargando…

Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care

INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heddaeus, Daniela, Dirmaier, Jörg, Brettschneider, Christian, Daubmann, Anne, Grochtdreis, Thomas, von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, König, Hans-Helmut, Löwe, Bernd, Maehder, Kerstin, Porzelt, Sarah, Rosenkranz, Moritz, Schäfer, Ingo, Scherer, Martin, Schulte, Bernd, Wegscheider, Karl, Weigel, Angelika, Werner, Silke, Zimmermann, Thomas, Härter, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408
_version_ 1783474975042174976
author Heddaeus, Daniela
Dirmaier, Jörg
Brettschneider, Christian
Daubmann, Anne
Grochtdreis, Thomas
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
König, Hans-Helmut
Löwe, Bernd
Maehder, Kerstin
Porzelt, Sarah
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Schäfer, Ingo
Scherer, Martin
Schulte, Bernd
Wegscheider, Karl
Weigel, Angelika
Werner, Silke
Zimmermann, Thomas
Härter, Martin
author_facet Heddaeus, Daniela
Dirmaier, Jörg
Brettschneider, Christian
Daubmann, Anne
Grochtdreis, Thomas
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
König, Hans-Helmut
Löwe, Bernd
Maehder, Kerstin
Porzelt, Sarah
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Schäfer, Ingo
Scherer, Martin
Schulte, Bernd
Wegscheider, Karl
Weigel, Angelika
Werner, Silke
Zimmermann, Thomas
Härter, Martin
author_sort Heddaeus, Daniela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorders, comorbid mental disorders have rarely been addressed in such care models. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model for depressive, anxiety, somatoform and alcohol use disorders within a multiprofessional network compared with treatment as usual. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group superiority trial, n=570 patients will be recruited from primary care practices (n=19 practices per group). The intervention is a newly developed collaborative and stepped care model in which patients will be treated using treatment options of various intensities within an integrated network of outpatient general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychotherapists and inpatient institutions. It will be compared with treatment as usual with regard to effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility, with the primary outcome being a change in mental health-related quality of life from baseline to 6 months. Patients in both groups will undergo an assessment at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after study inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (No. PV5595) and will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For dissemination, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Within the superordinate research project Hamburg Network for Health Services Research, the results will be communicated to relevant stakeholders in mental healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03226743.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68870292019-12-04 Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care Heddaeus, Daniela Dirmaier, Jörg Brettschneider, Christian Daubmann, Anne Grochtdreis, Thomas von dem Knesebeck, Olaf König, Hans-Helmut Löwe, Bernd Maehder, Kerstin Porzelt, Sarah Rosenkranz, Moritz Schäfer, Ingo Scherer, Martin Schulte, Bernd Wegscheider, Karl Weigel, Angelika Werner, Silke Zimmermann, Thomas Härter, Martin BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Mental healthcare is one of the biggest challenges for healthcare systems. Comorbidities between different mental disorders are common, and patients suffer from a high burden of disease. While the effectiveness of collaborative and stepped care models has been shown for single disorders, comorbid mental disorders have rarely been addressed in such care models. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model for depressive, anxiety, somatoform and alcohol use disorders within a multiprofessional network compared with treatment as usual. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group superiority trial, n=570 patients will be recruited from primary care practices (n=19 practices per group). The intervention is a newly developed collaborative and stepped care model in which patients will be treated using treatment options of various intensities within an integrated network of outpatient general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychotherapists and inpatient institutions. It will be compared with treatment as usual with regard to effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility, with the primary outcome being a change in mental health-related quality of life from baseline to 6 months. Patients in both groups will undergo an assessment at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after study inclusion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (No. PV5595) and will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. For dissemination, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Within the superordinate research project Hamburg Network for Health Services Research, the results will be communicated to relevant stakeholders in mental healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03226743. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6887029/ /pubmed/31767595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Heddaeus, Daniela
Dirmaier, Jörg
Brettschneider, Christian
Daubmann, Anne
Grochtdreis, Thomas
von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
König, Hans-Helmut
Löwe, Bernd
Maehder, Kerstin
Porzelt, Sarah
Rosenkranz, Moritz
Schäfer, Ingo
Scherer, Martin
Schulte, Bernd
Wegscheider, Karl
Weigel, Angelika
Werner, Silke
Zimmermann, Thomas
Härter, Martin
Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title_full Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title_fullStr Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title_short Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
title_sort study protocol for the comet study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408
work_keys_str_mv AT heddaeusdaniela studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT dirmaierjorg studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT brettschneiderchristian studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT daubmannanne studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT grochtdreisthomas studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT vondemknesebeckolaf studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT konighanshelmut studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT lowebernd studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT maehderkerstin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT porzeltsarah studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT rosenkranzmoritz studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT schaferingo studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT scherermartin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT schultebernd studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT wegscheiderkarl studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT weigelangelika studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT wernersilke studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT zimmermannthomas studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare
AT hartermartin studyprotocolforthecometstudyaclusterrandomisedprospectiveparallelgroupsuperioritytrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofacollaborativeandsteppedcaremodelversustreatmentasusualinpatientswithmentaldisordersinprimarycare