Cargando…

Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can be a challenge to healthcare providers to diagnose and treat. Accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is fundamental to ensure appropriate intervention is given. However, to date there is no gold standard to diagnose neuropathic LBLP. Pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mistry, Jai, Heneghan, Nicola R, Noblet, Timothy, Falla, Deborah, Rushton, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033187
_version_ 1783474985581412352
author Mistry, Jai
Heneghan, Nicola R
Noblet, Timothy
Falla, Deborah
Rushton, Alison
author_facet Mistry, Jai
Heneghan, Nicola R
Noblet, Timothy
Falla, Deborah
Rushton, Alison
author_sort Mistry, Jai
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can be a challenge to healthcare providers to diagnose and treat. Accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is fundamental to ensure appropriate intervention is given. However, to date there is no gold standard to diagnose neuropathic LBLP. Patient examination guidelines and screening tools have been developed and validated for the purpose of diagnosing neuropathic pain in LBLP; however, there has been no systematic review conducted to compare the diagnostic validity of these methods. Therefore, this systematic review will investigate the diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in LBLP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocols. CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, AMED, Pedro, PubMed, key journals and grey literature will be searched rigorously to find diagnostic accuracy studies investigating patient examination data to identify neuropathic pain in LBLP patients. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, extract the data and assess risk of bias for included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The overall quality of included studies will be evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. A meta-analysis will be conducted if deemed appropriate. Otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No research ethics is required for this systematic review since patient data will not be collected. This review will help to inform healthcare professionals and researchers on the most effective means in which to diagnose neuropathic pain in LBLP. Results of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-review journal and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140861
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68870742019-12-04 Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review Mistry, Jai Heneghan, Nicola R Noblet, Timothy Falla, Deborah Rushton, Alison BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can be a challenge to healthcare providers to diagnose and treat. Accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is fundamental to ensure appropriate intervention is given. However, to date there is no gold standard to diagnose neuropathic LBLP. Patient examination guidelines and screening tools have been developed and validated for the purpose of diagnosing neuropathic pain in LBLP; however, there has been no systematic review conducted to compare the diagnostic validity of these methods. Therefore, this systematic review will investigate the diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in LBLP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocols. CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, AMED, Pedro, PubMed, key journals and grey literature will be searched rigorously to find diagnostic accuracy studies investigating patient examination data to identify neuropathic pain in LBLP patients. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, extract the data and assess risk of bias for included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The overall quality of included studies will be evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. A meta-analysis will be conducted if deemed appropriate. Otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No research ethics is required for this systematic review since patient data will not be collected. This review will help to inform healthcare professionals and researchers on the most effective means in which to diagnose neuropathic pain in LBLP. Results of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-review journal and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140861 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6887074/ /pubmed/31767596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Mistry, Jai
Heneghan, Nicola R
Noblet, Timothy
Falla, Deborah
Rushton, Alison
Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort diagnostic utility of patient history, clinical examination and screening tool data to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033187
work_keys_str_mv AT mistryjai diagnosticutilityofpatienthistoryclinicalexaminationandscreeningtooldatatoidentifyneuropathicpaininlowbackrelatedlegpainprotocolforasystematicreview
AT heneghannicolar diagnosticutilityofpatienthistoryclinicalexaminationandscreeningtooldatatoidentifyneuropathicpaininlowbackrelatedlegpainprotocolforasystematicreview
AT noblettimothy diagnosticutilityofpatienthistoryclinicalexaminationandscreeningtooldatatoidentifyneuropathicpaininlowbackrelatedlegpainprotocolforasystematicreview
AT falladeborah diagnosticutilityofpatienthistoryclinicalexaminationandscreeningtooldatatoidentifyneuropathicpaininlowbackrelatedlegpainprotocolforasystematicreview
AT rushtonalison diagnosticutilityofpatienthistoryclinicalexaminationandscreeningtooldatatoidentifyneuropathicpaininlowbackrelatedlegpainprotocolforasystematicreview