Cargando…

How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city

OBJECTIVE: To investigate timely access to palliative medicines/drugs (PMs) from community pharmacies to inform palliative care service delivery. DESIGN: Mixed methods in two sequential phases: (1) prospective audit of prescriptions and concurrent survey of patients/representatives collecting PMs fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Elizabeth Jane, Morgan, Julie D, Blenkinsopp, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029016
_version_ 1783474989841776640
author Miller, Elizabeth Jane
Morgan, Julie D
Blenkinsopp, Alison
author_facet Miller, Elizabeth Jane
Morgan, Julie D
Blenkinsopp, Alison
author_sort Miller, Elizabeth Jane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate timely access to palliative medicines/drugs (PMs) from community pharmacies to inform palliative care service delivery. DESIGN: Mixed methods in two sequential phases: (1) prospective audit of prescriptions and concurrent survey of patients/representatives collecting PMs from pharmacy and (2) interviews with community pharmacists (CPs) and other healthcare professionals (HCPs). SETTING: Five community pharmacies in Sheffield, UK and HCPs that deliver palliative care in that community. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1: five CPs: two providing access to PMs within a locally commissioned service (LCS) and three not in the LCS; 55 patients/representatives who completed the survey when accessing PMs and phase 2: 16 HCPs, including five phase 1 CPs, were interviewed. RESULTS: The prescription audit collected information on 75 prescriptions (75 patients) with 271 individual PMs; 55 patients/representatives (73%) completed the survey. Patients/representatives reported 73% of PMs were needed urgently. In 80% of cases, patients/representatives received all PMs on the first pharmacy visit. One in five had to travel to more than one pharmacy to access PMs. The range of PMs stocked by pharmacies was the key facilitating factor. CPs reported practical issues causing difficulty keeping PMs in stock and playing a reactive role with palliative prescriptions. Confidentiality concerns were cited by other HCPs who were reluctant to share key patient information proactively with pharmacy teams. Inadequate information transfer, lack of CP integration into the care of palliative patients and poor HCP knowledge of which pharmacies stock PMs meant patients and their families were not always able to access PMs promptly. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent routine information transfer and integration of pharmacy teams in the care of palliative patients are needed to achieve timely access to PMs. Commissioners of PM access schemes should review and monitor access. HCPs need to be routinely made aware and reminded about the service and its locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68870922019-12-04 How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city Miller, Elizabeth Jane Morgan, Julie D Blenkinsopp, Alison BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVE: To investigate timely access to palliative medicines/drugs (PMs) from community pharmacies to inform palliative care service delivery. DESIGN: Mixed methods in two sequential phases: (1) prospective audit of prescriptions and concurrent survey of patients/representatives collecting PMs from pharmacy and (2) interviews with community pharmacists (CPs) and other healthcare professionals (HCPs). SETTING: Five community pharmacies in Sheffield, UK and HCPs that deliver palliative care in that community. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1: five CPs: two providing access to PMs within a locally commissioned service (LCS) and three not in the LCS; 55 patients/representatives who completed the survey when accessing PMs and phase 2: 16 HCPs, including five phase 1 CPs, were interviewed. RESULTS: The prescription audit collected information on 75 prescriptions (75 patients) with 271 individual PMs; 55 patients/representatives (73%) completed the survey. Patients/representatives reported 73% of PMs were needed urgently. In 80% of cases, patients/representatives received all PMs on the first pharmacy visit. One in five had to travel to more than one pharmacy to access PMs. The range of PMs stocked by pharmacies was the key facilitating factor. CPs reported practical issues causing difficulty keeping PMs in stock and playing a reactive role with palliative prescriptions. Confidentiality concerns were cited by other HCPs who were reluctant to share key patient information proactively with pharmacy teams. Inadequate information transfer, lack of CP integration into the care of palliative patients and poor HCP knowledge of which pharmacies stock PMs meant patients and their families were not always able to access PMs promptly. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent routine information transfer and integration of pharmacy teams in the care of palliative patients are needed to achieve timely access to PMs. Commissioners of PM access schemes should review and monitor access. HCPs need to be routinely made aware and reminded about the service and its locations. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6887092/ /pubmed/31767580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029016 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Miller, Elizabeth Jane
Morgan, Julie D
Blenkinsopp, Alison
How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title_full How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title_fullStr How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title_full_unstemmed How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title_short How timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? A mixed methods study in a UK city
title_sort how timely is access to palliative care medicines in the community? a mixed methods study in a uk city
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31767580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029016
work_keys_str_mv AT millerelizabethjane howtimelyisaccesstopalliativecaremedicinesinthecommunityamixedmethodsstudyinaukcity
AT morganjulied howtimelyisaccesstopalliativecaremedicinesinthecommunityamixedmethodsstudyinaukcity
AT blenkinsoppalison howtimelyisaccesstopalliativecaremedicinesinthecommunityamixedmethodsstudyinaukcity