Cargando…

Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study

INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavalova, Lucia, Halter, Mary, Snooks, Helen, Gale, Chris P, Weston, Clive, Watkins, Alan, Munro, Scott, Davies, Glenn, Hampton, Chelsey, Driscoll, Timothy, Rosser, Andy, Rees, Nigel, Black, Sarah, Quinn, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156
_version_ 1783475040718684160
author Gavalova, Lucia
Halter, Mary
Snooks, Helen
Gale, Chris P
Weston, Clive
Watkins, Alan
Munro, Scott
Davies, Glenn
Hampton, Chelsey
Driscoll, Timothy
Rosser, Andy
Rees, Nigel
Black, Sarah
Quinn, Tom
author_facet Gavalova, Lucia
Halter, Mary
Snooks, Helen
Gale, Chris P
Weston, Clive
Watkins, Alan
Munro, Scott
Davies, Glenn
Hampton, Chelsey
Driscoll, Timothy
Rosser, Andy
Rees, Nigel
Black, Sarah
Quinn, Tom
author_sort Gavalova, Lucia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically women, the elderly and those with comorbidities) under EMS care did not receive a PHECG. The overall aim of the PHECG2 study is to update evidence on care and outcomes for patients eligible for PHECG, specifically addressing the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality, and in reperfusion rate, between those who do and those who do not receive PHECG? (2) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks? (3) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in terms of social and demographic factors, or prehospital clinical presentation? (4) What factors influence EMS clinicians’ decisions to perform PHECG? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory, mixed-method study comprising four work packages (WPs). WP1 is a population-based, linked-data analysis of a national ACS registry (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project). WP2 is a retrospective chart review of patient records from three large regional EMS. WP3 comprises focus groups of EMS personnel. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1–3 to inform the development of an intervention to increase PHECG uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18LO1679). Findings will be disseminated through feedback to participating EMS, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03699137
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68875062019-12-04 Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study Gavalova, Lucia Halter, Mary Snooks, Helen Gale, Chris P Weston, Clive Watkins, Alan Munro, Scott Davies, Glenn Hampton, Chelsey Driscoll, Timothy Rosser, Andy Rees, Nigel Black, Sarah Quinn, Tom Open Heart Coronary Artery Disease INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically women, the elderly and those with comorbidities) under EMS care did not receive a PHECG. The overall aim of the PHECG2 study is to update evidence on care and outcomes for patients eligible for PHECG, specifically addressing the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality, and in reperfusion rate, between those who do and those who do not receive PHECG? (2) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks? (3) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in terms of social and demographic factors, or prehospital clinical presentation? (4) What factors influence EMS clinicians’ decisions to perform PHECG? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory, mixed-method study comprising four work packages (WPs). WP1 is a population-based, linked-data analysis of a national ACS registry (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project). WP2 is a retrospective chart review of patient records from three large regional EMS. WP3 comprises focus groups of EMS personnel. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1–3 to inform the development of an intervention to increase PHECG uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18LO1679). Findings will be disseminated through feedback to participating EMS, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03699137 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6887506/ /pubmed/31803487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Coronary Artery Disease
Gavalova, Lucia
Halter, Mary
Snooks, Helen
Gale, Chris P
Weston, Clive
Watkins, Alan
Munro, Scott
Davies, Glenn
Hampton, Chelsey
Driscoll, Timothy
Rosser, Andy
Rees, Nigel
Black, Sarah
Quinn, Tom
Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title_full Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title_fullStr Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title_short Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
title_sort use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ecg in the primary pci era (phecg2): protocol for a mixed-method study
topic Coronary Artery Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156
work_keys_str_mv AT gavalovalucia useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT haltermary useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT snookshelen useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT galechrisp useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT westonclive useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT watkinsalan useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT munroscott useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT daviesglenn useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT hamptonchelsey useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT driscolltimothy useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT rosserandy useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT reesnigel useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT blacksarah useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy
AT quinntom useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy