Cargando…
Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study
INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156 |
_version_ | 1783475040718684160 |
---|---|
author | Gavalova, Lucia Halter, Mary Snooks, Helen Gale, Chris P Weston, Clive Watkins, Alan Munro, Scott Davies, Glenn Hampton, Chelsey Driscoll, Timothy Rosser, Andy Rees, Nigel Black, Sarah Quinn, Tom |
author_facet | Gavalova, Lucia Halter, Mary Snooks, Helen Gale, Chris P Weston, Clive Watkins, Alan Munro, Scott Davies, Glenn Hampton, Chelsey Driscoll, Timothy Rosser, Andy Rees, Nigel Black, Sarah Quinn, Tom |
author_sort | Gavalova, Lucia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically women, the elderly and those with comorbidities) under EMS care did not receive a PHECG. The overall aim of the PHECG2 study is to update evidence on care and outcomes for patients eligible for PHECG, specifically addressing the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality, and in reperfusion rate, between those who do and those who do not receive PHECG? (2) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks? (3) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in terms of social and demographic factors, or prehospital clinical presentation? (4) What factors influence EMS clinicians’ decisions to perform PHECG? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory, mixed-method study comprising four work packages (WPs). WP1 is a population-based, linked-data analysis of a national ACS registry (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project). WP2 is a retrospective chart review of patient records from three large regional EMS. WP3 comprises focus groups of EMS personnel. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1–3 to inform the development of an intervention to increase PHECG uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18LO1679). Findings will be disseminated through feedback to participating EMS, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03699137 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6887506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68875062019-12-04 Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study Gavalova, Lucia Halter, Mary Snooks, Helen Gale, Chris P Weston, Clive Watkins, Alan Munro, Scott Davies, Glenn Hampton, Chelsey Driscoll, Timothy Rosser, Andy Rees, Nigel Black, Sarah Quinn, Tom Open Heart Coronary Artery Disease INTRODUCTION: Use of the prehospital 12-lead ECG (PHECG) is recommended in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior research found that although PHECG use was associated with improved 30-day survival, a third of patients (typically women, the elderly and those with comorbidities) under EMS care did not receive a PHECG. The overall aim of the PHECG2 study is to update evidence on care and outcomes for patients eligible for PHECG, specifically addressing the following research questions: (1) Is there a difference in 30-day mortality, and in reperfusion rate, between those who do and those who do not receive PHECG? (2) Has the proportion of eligible patients who receive PHECG changed since the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention networks? (3) Are patients that receive PHECG different from those that do not in terms of social and demographic factors, or prehospital clinical presentation? (4) What factors influence EMS clinicians’ decisions to perform PHECG? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory, mixed-method study comprising four work packages (WPs). WP1 is a population-based, linked-data analysis of a national ACS registry (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project). WP2 is a retrospective chart review of patient records from three large regional EMS. WP3 comprises focus groups of EMS personnel. WP4 will synthesise findings from WP1–3 to inform the development of an intervention to increase PHECG uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18LO1679). Findings will be disseminated through feedback to participating EMS, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03699137 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6887506/ /pubmed/31803487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Coronary Artery Disease Gavalova, Lucia Halter, Mary Snooks, Helen Gale, Chris P Weston, Clive Watkins, Alan Munro, Scott Davies, Glenn Hampton, Chelsey Driscoll, Timothy Rosser, Andy Rees, Nigel Black, Sarah Quinn, Tom Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title | Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title_full | Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title_fullStr | Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title_full_unstemmed | Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title_short | Use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ECG in the primary PCI era (PHECG2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
title_sort | use and impact of the prehospital 12-lead ecg in the primary pci era (phecg2): protocol for a mixed-method study |
topic | Coronary Artery Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavalovalucia useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT haltermary useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT snookshelen useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT galechrisp useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT westonclive useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT watkinsalan useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT munroscott useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT daviesglenn useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT hamptonchelsey useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT driscolltimothy useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT rosserandy useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT reesnigel useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT blacksarah useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy AT quinntom useandimpactoftheprehospital12leadecgintheprimarypcieraphecg2protocolforamixedmethodstudy |