Cargando…
Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827724 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324 |
_version_ | 1783475048441446400 |
---|---|
author | Kitajima, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, Masaki Katsuura, Takayuki Kondo, Nobuyuki Minami, Toshiyuki Kuribayashi, Kozo Hasegawa, Seiki Kijima, Takashi Yamakado, Koichiro |
author_facet | Kitajima, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, Masaki Katsuura, Takayuki Kondo, Nobuyuki Minami, Toshiyuki Kuribayashi, Kozo Hasegawa, Seiki Kijima, Takashi Yamakado, Koichiro |
author_sort | Kitajima, Kazuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Treatment failure was confirmed in 40 patients. The patient-based area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC)/sensitivity/specificity/accuracy were 0.915/90.0%/80.0%/88.0% for FDG-PET/CT, and 0.805/75.0%/90.0%/78.0% for contrast-enhanced CT, respectively. AUC and sensitivity values were significantly different between the modalities (both p=0.041). Patient-based AUC values for diagnosing locoregional recurrence (ipsilateral hemithoracic recurrence) and distant metastasis, including peritoneal dissemination and lung, bone, muscle, and liver metastasis, were also significantly different (p=0.023 and p=0.035, respectively). The findings of FDG-PET/CT resulted in a change of management for 14 of the 50 patients (28%) by initiating new treatment. Of six patients judged as not having recurrence by contrast-enhanced CT but truly having recurrence based on FDG-PET/CT findings, 4 patients received new treatment due toFDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent radical surgery for MPM received FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck/chest/abdomen/pelvis CT examinations for surveillance or suspected recurrence within a 2-week period. Diagnostic ability was determined on a patient and lesion-site basis by 2 experienced examiners, and the modalities were compared using ROC analysis and McNemar test results. Lesion status was determined on the basis of histopathology, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT findings were shown to be more accurate for assessing MPM recurrence and more often led to therapy change than contrast-enhanced CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6887579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68875792019-12-11 Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT Kitajima, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, Masaki Katsuura, Takayuki Kondo, Nobuyuki Minami, Toshiyuki Kuribayashi, Kozo Hasegawa, Seiki Kijima, Takashi Yamakado, Koichiro Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Treatment failure was confirmed in 40 patients. The patient-based area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC)/sensitivity/specificity/accuracy were 0.915/90.0%/80.0%/88.0% for FDG-PET/CT, and 0.805/75.0%/90.0%/78.0% for contrast-enhanced CT, respectively. AUC and sensitivity values were significantly different between the modalities (both p=0.041). Patient-based AUC values for diagnosing locoregional recurrence (ipsilateral hemithoracic recurrence) and distant metastasis, including peritoneal dissemination and lung, bone, muscle, and liver metastasis, were also significantly different (p=0.023 and p=0.035, respectively). The findings of FDG-PET/CT resulted in a change of management for 14 of the 50 patients (28%) by initiating new treatment. Of six patients judged as not having recurrence by contrast-enhanced CT but truly having recurrence based on FDG-PET/CT findings, 4 patients received new treatment due toFDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent radical surgery for MPM received FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck/chest/abdomen/pelvis CT examinations for surveillance or suspected recurrence within a 2-week period. Diagnostic ability was determined on a patient and lesion-site basis by 2 experienced examiners, and the modalities were compared using ROC analysis and McNemar test results. Lesion status was determined on the basis of histopathology, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT findings were shown to be more accurate for assessing MPM recurrence and more often led to therapy change than contrast-enhanced CT. Impact Journals LLC 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6887579/ /pubmed/31827724 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Kitajima et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kitajima, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, Masaki Katsuura, Takayuki Kondo, Nobuyuki Minami, Toshiyuki Kuribayashi, Kozo Hasegawa, Seiki Kijima, Takashi Yamakado, Koichiro Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title | Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title_full | Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title_short | Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT |
title_sort | clinical utility of fdg-pet/ct for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – comparison with contrast-enhanced ct |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827724 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitajimakazuhiro clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT hashimotomasaki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT katsuuratakayuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT kondonobuyuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT minamitoshiyuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT kuribayashikozo clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT hasegawaseiki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT kijimatakashi clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct AT yamakadokoichiro clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct |