Cargando…

Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Hashimoto, Masaki, Katsuura, Takayuki, Kondo, Nobuyuki, Minami, Toshiyuki, Kuribayashi, Kozo, Hasegawa, Seiki, Kijima, Takashi, Yamakado, Koichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827724
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324
_version_ 1783475048441446400
author Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Hashimoto, Masaki
Katsuura, Takayuki
Kondo, Nobuyuki
Minami, Toshiyuki
Kuribayashi, Kozo
Hasegawa, Seiki
Kijima, Takashi
Yamakado, Koichiro
author_facet Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Hashimoto, Masaki
Katsuura, Takayuki
Kondo, Nobuyuki
Minami, Toshiyuki
Kuribayashi, Kozo
Hasegawa, Seiki
Kijima, Takashi
Yamakado, Koichiro
author_sort Kitajima, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Treatment failure was confirmed in 40 patients. The patient-based area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC)/sensitivity/specificity/accuracy were 0.915/90.0%/80.0%/88.0% for FDG-PET/CT, and 0.805/75.0%/90.0%/78.0% for contrast-enhanced CT, respectively. AUC and sensitivity values were significantly different between the modalities (both p=0.041). Patient-based AUC values for diagnosing locoregional recurrence (ipsilateral hemithoracic recurrence) and distant metastasis, including peritoneal dissemination and lung, bone, muscle, and liver metastasis, were also significantly different (p=0.023 and p=0.035, respectively). The findings of FDG-PET/CT resulted in a change of management for 14 of the 50 patients (28%) by initiating new treatment. Of six patients judged as not having recurrence by contrast-enhanced CT but truly having recurrence based on FDG-PET/CT findings, 4 patients received new treatment due toFDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent radical surgery for MPM received FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck/chest/abdomen/pelvis CT examinations for surveillance or suspected recurrence within a 2-week period. Diagnostic ability was determined on a patient and lesion-site basis by 2 experienced examiners, and the modalities were compared using ROC analysis and McNemar test results. Lesion status was determined on the basis of histopathology, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT findings were shown to be more accurate for assessing MPM recurrence and more often led to therapy change than contrast-enhanced CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68875792019-12-11 Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT Kitajima, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, Masaki Katsuura, Takayuki Kondo, Nobuyuki Minami, Toshiyuki Kuribayashi, Kozo Hasegawa, Seiki Kijima, Takashi Yamakado, Koichiro Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after a radical surgery procedure and their impact on clinical management in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: Treatment failure was confirmed in 40 patients. The patient-based area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC)/sensitivity/specificity/accuracy were 0.915/90.0%/80.0%/88.0% for FDG-PET/CT, and 0.805/75.0%/90.0%/78.0% for contrast-enhanced CT, respectively. AUC and sensitivity values were significantly different between the modalities (both p=0.041). Patient-based AUC values for diagnosing locoregional recurrence (ipsilateral hemithoracic recurrence) and distant metastasis, including peritoneal dissemination and lung, bone, muscle, and liver metastasis, were also significantly different (p=0.023 and p=0.035, respectively). The findings of FDG-PET/CT resulted in a change of management for 14 of the 50 patients (28%) by initiating new treatment. Of six patients judged as not having recurrence by contrast-enhanced CT but truly having recurrence based on FDG-PET/CT findings, 4 patients received new treatment due toFDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent radical surgery for MPM received FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck/chest/abdomen/pelvis CT examinations for surveillance or suspected recurrence within a 2-week period. Diagnostic ability was determined on a patient and lesion-site basis by 2 experienced examiners, and the modalities were compared using ROC analysis and McNemar test results. Lesion status was determined on the basis of histopathology, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT findings were shown to be more accurate for assessing MPM recurrence and more often led to therapy change than contrast-enhanced CT. Impact Journals LLC 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6887579/ /pubmed/31827724 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Kitajima et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Hashimoto, Masaki
Katsuura, Takayuki
Kondo, Nobuyuki
Minami, Toshiyuki
Kuribayashi, Kozo
Hasegawa, Seiki
Kijima, Takashi
Yamakado, Koichiro
Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title_full Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title_fullStr Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title_short Clinical utility of FDG-PET/CT for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – Comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
title_sort clinical utility of fdg-pet/ct for post-surgery surveillance of malignant pleural mesothelioma – comparison with contrast-enhanced ct
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827724
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27324
work_keys_str_mv AT kitajimakazuhiro clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT hashimotomasaki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT katsuuratakayuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT kondonobuyuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT minamitoshiyuki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT kuribayashikozo clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT hasegawaseiki clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT kijimatakashi clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT yamakadokoichiro clinicalutilityoffdgpetctforpostsurgerysurveillanceofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomacomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct