Cargando…

Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients

OBJECTIVES: To highlight and compare spectrum of hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings in primary and secondary infertility patients. METHODS: This retrospective record-based cross-sectional study was performed in the Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical City, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waheed, Khawaja B., Albassam, Muneera A., AlShamrani, Alaa Ali G., Aloumi, Shayma A., Amin, Muhammad S., Rashid, Lubna, AlGodayan, Sarah M., Ahmad, Siti Fatimah B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588489
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.10.24538
_version_ 1783475107225665536
author Waheed, Khawaja B.
Albassam, Muneera A.
AlShamrani, Alaa Ali G.
Aloumi, Shayma A.
Amin, Muhammad S.
Rashid, Lubna
AlGodayan, Sarah M.
Ahmad, Siti Fatimah B.
author_facet Waheed, Khawaja B.
Albassam, Muneera A.
AlShamrani, Alaa Ali G.
Aloumi, Shayma A.
Amin, Muhammad S.
Rashid, Lubna
AlGodayan, Sarah M.
Ahmad, Siti Fatimah B.
author_sort Waheed, Khawaja B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To highlight and compare spectrum of hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings in primary and secondary infertility patients. METHODS: This retrospective record-based cross-sectional study was performed in the Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical City, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between August 2016 and 2018. All patients (N=303) who underwent successful HSGs were included, and grouped under primary and secondary infertility cases. Patients with failed, limited or incomplete studies were excluded. Imaging findings were documented as N (Normal) or Ab (Abnormal). Abnormal HSG findings were further categorized as: C=congenital malformation, I=infection or inflammation, S=surgery, T=tumor or tear. Abnormal findings were confirmed on further imaging or intervention. Chi-square test was used to determine any association of HSG findings with type of infertility, and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients, 166 patients (54.8%) had primary infertility while the rest had secondary infertility. Abnormal studies were found in less than one-third of patients (n=93, 30.7%). Primary infertility patients exhibited more congenital (C) malformations, while surgery (S) was seen more in secondary infertility patients (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Congenital malformations are commonly found abnormalities on HSGs in primary infertility patients, while surgery related findings are seen in secondary infertility cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68878742021-02-26 Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients Waheed, Khawaja B. Albassam, Muneera A. AlShamrani, Alaa Ali G. Aloumi, Shayma A. Amin, Muhammad S. Rashid, Lubna AlGodayan, Sarah M. Ahmad, Siti Fatimah B. Saudi Med J Brief Communication OBJECTIVES: To highlight and compare spectrum of hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings in primary and secondary infertility patients. METHODS: This retrospective record-based cross-sectional study was performed in the Radiology Department, King Fahad Military Medical City, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between August 2016 and 2018. All patients (N=303) who underwent successful HSGs were included, and grouped under primary and secondary infertility cases. Patients with failed, limited or incomplete studies were excluded. Imaging findings were documented as N (Normal) or Ab (Abnormal). Abnormal HSG findings were further categorized as: C=congenital malformation, I=infection or inflammation, S=surgery, T=tumor or tear. Abnormal findings were confirmed on further imaging or intervention. Chi-square test was used to determine any association of HSG findings with type of infertility, and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients, 166 patients (54.8%) had primary infertility while the rest had secondary infertility. Abnormal studies were found in less than one-third of patients (n=93, 30.7%). Primary infertility patients exhibited more congenital (C) malformations, while surgery (S) was seen more in secondary infertility patients (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Congenital malformations are commonly found abnormalities on HSGs in primary infertility patients, while surgery related findings are seen in secondary infertility cases. Saudi Medical Journal 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6887874/ /pubmed/31588489 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.10.24538 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Waheed, Khawaja B.
Albassam, Muneera A.
AlShamrani, Alaa Ali G.
Aloumi, Shayma A.
Amin, Muhammad S.
Rashid, Lubna
AlGodayan, Sarah M.
Ahmad, Siti Fatimah B.
Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title_full Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title_fullStr Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title_full_unstemmed Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title_short Hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
title_sort hysterosalpingographic findings in primary and secondary infertility patients
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588489
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.10.24538
work_keys_str_mv AT waheedkhawajab hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT albassammuneeraa hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT alshamranialaaalig hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT aloumishaymaa hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT aminmuhammads hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT rashidlubna hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT algodayansarahm hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients
AT ahmadsitifatimahb hysterosalpingographicfindingsinprimaryandsecondaryinfertilitypatients