Cargando…
Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility and safety of performing diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) routinely in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemothera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50193 |
_version_ | 1783475113961717760 |
---|---|
author | Hentzen, J. E. K. R. van der Plas, W. Y. Constansia, R. D. N. Been, L. B. Hoogwater, F. J. H. van Ginkel, R. J. van Dam, G. M. Hemmer, P. H. J. Kruijff, S. |
author_facet | Hentzen, J. E. K. R. van der Plas, W. Y. Constansia, R. D. N. Been, L. B. Hoogwater, F. J. H. van Ginkel, R. J. van Dam, G. M. Hemmer, P. H. J. Kruijff, S. |
author_sort | Hentzen, J. E. K. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility and safety of performing diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) routinely in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHODS: Data for consecutive patients who underwent DLS between 2012 and 2018 were extracted retrospectively from an institutional database. The primary outcome was the degree of visibility of the abdominal cavity during DLS. Good laparoscopic evaluation of the abdominal cavity was defined as visibility of at least the regions of the diaphragm, pelvis and small bowel. Secondary outcomes were reasons for perioperative exclusion for CRS + HIPEC, major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade III or above) and difference in overall survival (OS) between patients deemed suitable or unsuitable for CRS + HIPEC. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS: Some 184 patients were analysed. Good laparoscopic evaluation was possible in 138 patients (75·0 per cent), and 24 (13·0 per cent) had conversion to an open procedure. Ninety‐three patients (50·5 per cent) were excluded for CRS + HIPEC, most commonly because of absence of colorectal PM (34 patients, 37 per cent) or extensive disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index 20 or above) (33 patients, 35 per cent). Major complications occurred in five patients (2·7 per cent), with no postoperative deaths. Median OS was significantly decreased in patients who were excluded due to extensive disease (14 (95 per cent c.i. 10 to 18) months) compared with patients suitable for CRS + HIPEC (36 (27 to 45) months) (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Routinely performing DLS in patients with suspicion of colorectal PM to evaluate suitability for CRS + HIPEC is feasible and safe, avoiding the morbidity of an unnecessary laparotomy in patients with extensive disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6887897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68878972019-12-12 Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy Hentzen, J. E. K. R. van der Plas, W. Y. Constansia, R. D. N. Been, L. B. Hoogwater, F. J. H. van Ginkel, R. J. van Dam, G. M. Hemmer, P. H. J. Kruijff, S. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility and safety of performing diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) routinely in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHODS: Data for consecutive patients who underwent DLS between 2012 and 2018 were extracted retrospectively from an institutional database. The primary outcome was the degree of visibility of the abdominal cavity during DLS. Good laparoscopic evaluation of the abdominal cavity was defined as visibility of at least the regions of the diaphragm, pelvis and small bowel. Secondary outcomes were reasons for perioperative exclusion for CRS + HIPEC, major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade III or above) and difference in overall survival (OS) between patients deemed suitable or unsuitable for CRS + HIPEC. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS: Some 184 patients were analysed. Good laparoscopic evaluation was possible in 138 patients (75·0 per cent), and 24 (13·0 per cent) had conversion to an open procedure. Ninety‐three patients (50·5 per cent) were excluded for CRS + HIPEC, most commonly because of absence of colorectal PM (34 patients, 37 per cent) or extensive disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index 20 or above) (33 patients, 35 per cent). Major complications occurred in five patients (2·7 per cent), with no postoperative deaths. Median OS was significantly decreased in patients who were excluded due to extensive disease (14 (95 per cent c.i. 10 to 18) months) compared with patients suitable for CRS + HIPEC (36 (27 to 45) months) (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Routinely performing DLS in patients with suspicion of colorectal PM to evaluate suitability for CRS + HIPEC is feasible and safe, avoiding the morbidity of an unnecessary laparotomy in patients with extensive disease. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6887897/ /pubmed/31832588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50193 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hentzen, J. E. K. R. van der Plas, W. Y. Constansia, R. D. N. Been, L. B. Hoogwater, F. J. H. van Ginkel, R. J. van Dam, G. M. Hemmer, P. H. J. Kruijff, S. Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title | Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title_full | Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title_short | Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
title_sort | role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspicion of colorectal peritoneal metastases to evaluate suitability for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hentzenjekr roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT vanderplaswy roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT constansiardn roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT beenlb roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT hoogwaterfjh roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT vanginkelrj roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT vandamgm roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT hemmerphj roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy AT kruijffs roleofdiagnosticlaparoscopyinpatientswithsuspicionofcolorectalperitonealmetastasestoevaluatesuitabilityforcytoreductivesurgerywithhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy |