Cargando…

The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York

Receiving smoking cessation services from telephone quitlines significantly increases quit success compared with no intervention or other quitting methods. To affect population-level smoking, quitlines must provide a sufficient proportion of smokers with effective interventions. Nationally, quitline...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Nathan, Nonnemaker, James, Davis, Kevin, Chapman, LeTonya, Thompson, Jesse, Juster, Harlan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224477
_version_ 1783475122925993984
author Mann, Nathan
Nonnemaker, James
Davis, Kevin
Chapman, LeTonya
Thompson, Jesse
Juster, Harlan R.
author_facet Mann, Nathan
Nonnemaker, James
Davis, Kevin
Chapman, LeTonya
Thompson, Jesse
Juster, Harlan R.
author_sort Mann, Nathan
collection PubMed
description Receiving smoking cessation services from telephone quitlines significantly increases quit success compared with no intervention or other quitting methods. To affect population-level smoking, quitlines must provide a sufficient proportion of smokers with effective interventions. Nationally, quitlines reach around 1% of adult smokers annually. From 2011 through 2016, the average annual reach of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline (NYSSQL) was 2.9%. We used data on the reach and cessation outcomes of NYSSQL to estimate its current impact on population-level smoking prevalence and to estimate how much reach would have to increase to achieve population-level smoking prevalence reductions. We estimate NYSSQL is associated with a 0.02 to 0.04 percentage point reduction in smoking prevalence in New York annually. If NYSSQL achieved the recommended annual reach of 8% (CDC Best Practices) and 16% (NAQC), state-level prevalence would decrease by an estimated 0.07–0.12 and 0.13–0.24 percentage points per year, respectively. To achieve those recommended levels of reach, NYSSQL would need to provide services to approximately 3.5 to 6.9 times more smokers annually. Given their reach, quitlines are limited in their ability to affect population-level smoking. Increasing quitline reach may not be feasible and would likely be cost-prohibitive. It may be necessary to re-think the role of quitlines in tobacco control efforts. In New York, the quitline is being integrated into larger efforts to promote cessation through health systems change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6887956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68879562019-12-09 The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York Mann, Nathan Nonnemaker, James Davis, Kevin Chapman, LeTonya Thompson, Jesse Juster, Harlan R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Receiving smoking cessation services from telephone quitlines significantly increases quit success compared with no intervention or other quitting methods. To affect population-level smoking, quitlines must provide a sufficient proportion of smokers with effective interventions. Nationally, quitlines reach around 1% of adult smokers annually. From 2011 through 2016, the average annual reach of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline (NYSSQL) was 2.9%. We used data on the reach and cessation outcomes of NYSSQL to estimate its current impact on population-level smoking prevalence and to estimate how much reach would have to increase to achieve population-level smoking prevalence reductions. We estimate NYSSQL is associated with a 0.02 to 0.04 percentage point reduction in smoking prevalence in New York annually. If NYSSQL achieved the recommended annual reach of 8% (CDC Best Practices) and 16% (NAQC), state-level prevalence would decrease by an estimated 0.07–0.12 and 0.13–0.24 percentage points per year, respectively. To achieve those recommended levels of reach, NYSSQL would need to provide services to approximately 3.5 to 6.9 times more smokers annually. Given their reach, quitlines are limited in their ability to affect population-level smoking. Increasing quitline reach may not be feasible and would likely be cost-prohibitive. It may be necessary to re-think the role of quitlines in tobacco control efforts. In New York, the quitline is being integrated into larger efforts to promote cessation through health systems change. MDPI 2019-11-14 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6887956/ /pubmed/31739413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224477 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mann, Nathan
Nonnemaker, James
Davis, Kevin
Chapman, LeTonya
Thompson, Jesse
Juster, Harlan R.
The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title_full The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title_fullStr The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title_full_unstemmed The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title_short The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers’ Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York
title_sort potential impact of the new york state smokers’ quitline on population-level smoking rates in new york
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739413
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224477
work_keys_str_mv AT mannnathan thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT nonnemakerjames thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT daviskevin thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT chapmanletonya thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT thompsonjesse thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT justerharlanr thepotentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT mannnathan potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT nonnemakerjames potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT daviskevin potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT chapmanletonya potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT thompsonjesse potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork
AT justerharlanr potentialimpactofthenewyorkstatesmokersquitlineonpopulationlevelsmokingratesinnewyork