Cargando…

Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common antenatal complication in Australia. All pregnant women are recommended for screening by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As part of a study to improve screening, 694 women from 27 regional, rural and remote clinics were recruited from 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamieson, Emma L., Spry, Erica P., Kirke, Andrew B., Atkinson, David N., Marley, Julia V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224488
_version_ 1783475140782194688
author Jamieson, Emma L.
Spry, Erica P.
Kirke, Andrew B.
Atkinson, David N.
Marley, Julia V.
author_facet Jamieson, Emma L.
Spry, Erica P.
Kirke, Andrew B.
Atkinson, David N.
Marley, Julia V.
author_sort Jamieson, Emma L.
collection PubMed
description Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common antenatal complication in Australia. All pregnant women are recommended for screening by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As part of a study to improve screening, 694 women from 27 regional, rural and remote clinics were recruited from 2015–2018 into the Optimisation of Rural Clinical and Haematological Indicators for Diabetes in pregnancy (ORCHID) study. Most routine OGTT samples were analysed more than four hours post fasting collection (median 5.0 h, range 2.3 to 124 h), potentially reducing glucose levels due to glycolysis. In 2019, to assess pre-analytical plasma glucose (PG) instability over time, we evaluated alternative sample handling protocols in a sample of participants. Four extra samples were collected alongside routine room temperature (RT) fluoride-oxalate samples (FLOX(RT)): study FLOX(RT); ice slurry (FLOX(ICE)); RT fluoride-citrate-EDTA (FC Mix), and RT lithium-heparin plasma separation tubes (PST). Time course glucose measurements were then used to estimate glycolysis from ORCHID participants who completed routine OGTT after 24 weeks gestation (n = 501). Adjusting for glycolysis using FLOX(ICE) measurements estimated 62% under-diagnosis of GDM (FLOX(RT) 10.8% v FLOX(ICE) 28.5% (95% CI, 20.8–29.5%), p < 0.001). FC Mix tubes provided excellent glucose stability but gave slightly higher results (Fasting PG: +0.20 ± 0.05 mmol/L). While providing a realistic alternative to the impractical FLOX(ICE) protocol, direct substitution of FC Mix tubes in clinical practice may require revision of GDM diagnostic thresholds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6888052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68880522019-12-09 Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia Jamieson, Emma L. Spry, Erica P. Kirke, Andrew B. Atkinson, David N. Marley, Julia V. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common antenatal complication in Australia. All pregnant women are recommended for screening by 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As part of a study to improve screening, 694 women from 27 regional, rural and remote clinics were recruited from 2015–2018 into the Optimisation of Rural Clinical and Haematological Indicators for Diabetes in pregnancy (ORCHID) study. Most routine OGTT samples were analysed more than four hours post fasting collection (median 5.0 h, range 2.3 to 124 h), potentially reducing glucose levels due to glycolysis. In 2019, to assess pre-analytical plasma glucose (PG) instability over time, we evaluated alternative sample handling protocols in a sample of participants. Four extra samples were collected alongside routine room temperature (RT) fluoride-oxalate samples (FLOX(RT)): study FLOX(RT); ice slurry (FLOX(ICE)); RT fluoride-citrate-EDTA (FC Mix), and RT lithium-heparin plasma separation tubes (PST). Time course glucose measurements were then used to estimate glycolysis from ORCHID participants who completed routine OGTT after 24 weeks gestation (n = 501). Adjusting for glycolysis using FLOX(ICE) measurements estimated 62% under-diagnosis of GDM (FLOX(RT) 10.8% v FLOX(ICE) 28.5% (95% CI, 20.8–29.5%), p < 0.001). FC Mix tubes provided excellent glucose stability but gave slightly higher results (Fasting PG: +0.20 ± 0.05 mmol/L). While providing a realistic alternative to the impractical FLOX(ICE) protocol, direct substitution of FC Mix tubes in clinical practice may require revision of GDM diagnostic thresholds. MDPI 2019-11-14 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6888052/ /pubmed/31739513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224488 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jamieson, Emma L.
Spry, Erica P.
Kirke, Andrew B.
Atkinson, David N.
Marley, Julia V.
Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title_full Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title_fullStr Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title_short Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia
title_sort real-world gestational diabetes screening: problems with the oral glucose tolerance test in rural and remote australia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224488
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiesonemmal realworldgestationaldiabetesscreeningproblemswiththeoralglucosetolerancetestinruralandremoteaustralia
AT spryericap realworldgestationaldiabetesscreeningproblemswiththeoralglucosetolerancetestinruralandremoteaustralia
AT kirkeandrewb realworldgestationaldiabetesscreeningproblemswiththeoralglucosetolerancetestinruralandremoteaustralia
AT atkinsondavidn realworldgestationaldiabetesscreeningproblemswiththeoralglucosetolerancetestinruralandremoteaustralia
AT marleyjuliav realworldgestationaldiabetesscreeningproblemswiththeoralglucosetolerancetestinruralandremoteaustralia