Cargando…

Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study

The study aimed to evaluate a temperature increase in, and damage to, titanium implants during flapless laser debridement. The study analyzed 15 implants with various implant–abutment connections: a two-piece implant (n = 4) with a screw abutment (IA—Implant–Abutment) and a one-piece implant with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matys, Jacek, Romeo, Umberto, Mroczka, Krzysztof, Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga, Dominiak, Marzena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223748
_version_ 1783475144206843904
author Matys, Jacek
Romeo, Umberto
Mroczka, Krzysztof
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Dominiak, Marzena
author_facet Matys, Jacek
Romeo, Umberto
Mroczka, Krzysztof
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Dominiak, Marzena
author_sort Matys, Jacek
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to evaluate a temperature increase in, and damage to, titanium implants during flapless laser debridement. The study analyzed 15 implants with various implant–abutment connections: a two-piece implant (n = 4) with a screw abutment (IA—Implant–Abutment) and a one-piece implant with a ball type fixture (BTF, n = 4) or fix type fixture (FTF, n = 4). The implants were placed in porcine mandibles 2 mm over a bone crest to imitate a peri-implantitis. The implants were debrided in contact mode for 60 s with a Er:YAG laser at fluence of 9.95 J/cm(2) (G1 group: 50 mJ/30 Hz); 19.89 J/cm(2) (G2 group: 100 mJ/30 Hz); 39.79 J/cm(2) (G3 group: 200 mJ/30 Hz), or a scaler with a ceramic tip (G4 control group: 4 W/20 Hz). The temperature was measured with thermocouples at implant and abutment levels. The damage in the titanium surface (n = 3, non-irradiated implants from each type) was assessed using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy). The temperature increase at the implant level for the laser was higher at IA in contrast with FTF and BTF. (p < 0.05) The temperature change at the abutment level was lower for the scaler in contrast to Er:YAG laser at FTF. (p < 0.0002) Er:YAG laser didn’t increase the temperature by 10 °C at 100 mJ/30 Hz and 50 mJ/30 Hz. Based on SEM analysis, cracks occurred on the surface of two-piece implants and were more pronounced. Cracks and the melting of the titanium surface of two-piece implants cleaned with Er:YAG laser at 100 or 200 mJ were observed. The specimens treated with the ultrasonic scaler with a plastic curette showed the remaining dark debris on the titanium surface. We recommend using Er:YAG laser at 50 mJ/30 Hz during flapless implants debridement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6888067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68880672019-12-09 Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study Matys, Jacek Romeo, Umberto Mroczka, Krzysztof Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Dominiak, Marzena Materials (Basel) Article The study aimed to evaluate a temperature increase in, and damage to, titanium implants during flapless laser debridement. The study analyzed 15 implants with various implant–abutment connections: a two-piece implant (n = 4) with a screw abutment (IA—Implant–Abutment) and a one-piece implant with a ball type fixture (BTF, n = 4) or fix type fixture (FTF, n = 4). The implants were placed in porcine mandibles 2 mm over a bone crest to imitate a peri-implantitis. The implants were debrided in contact mode for 60 s with a Er:YAG laser at fluence of 9.95 J/cm(2) (G1 group: 50 mJ/30 Hz); 19.89 J/cm(2) (G2 group: 100 mJ/30 Hz); 39.79 J/cm(2) (G3 group: 200 mJ/30 Hz), or a scaler with a ceramic tip (G4 control group: 4 W/20 Hz). The temperature was measured with thermocouples at implant and abutment levels. The damage in the titanium surface (n = 3, non-irradiated implants from each type) was assessed using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy). The temperature increase at the implant level for the laser was higher at IA in contrast with FTF and BTF. (p < 0.05) The temperature change at the abutment level was lower for the scaler in contrast to Er:YAG laser at FTF. (p < 0.0002) Er:YAG laser didn’t increase the temperature by 10 °C at 100 mJ/30 Hz and 50 mJ/30 Hz. Based on SEM analysis, cracks occurred on the surface of two-piece implants and were more pronounced. Cracks and the melting of the titanium surface of two-piece implants cleaned with Er:YAG laser at 100 or 200 mJ were observed. The specimens treated with the ultrasonic scaler with a plastic curette showed the remaining dark debris on the titanium surface. We recommend using Er:YAG laser at 50 mJ/30 Hz during flapless implants debridement. MDPI 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6888067/ /pubmed/31739427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223748 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matys, Jacek
Romeo, Umberto
Mroczka, Krzysztof
Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga
Dominiak, Marzena
Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title_fullStr Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title_short Temperature Changes and SEM Effects of Three Different Implants-Abutment Connection during Debridement with Er:YAG Laser: An Ex Vivo Study
title_sort temperature changes and sem effects of three different implants-abutment connection during debridement with er:yag laser: an ex vivo study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223748
work_keys_str_mv AT matysjacek temperaturechangesandsemeffectsofthreedifferentimplantsabutmentconnectionduringdebridementwitheryaglaseranexvivostudy
AT romeoumberto temperaturechangesandsemeffectsofthreedifferentimplantsabutmentconnectionduringdebridementwitheryaglaseranexvivostudy
AT mroczkakrzysztof temperaturechangesandsemeffectsofthreedifferentimplantsabutmentconnectionduringdebridementwitheryaglaseranexvivostudy
AT grzechlesniakkinga temperaturechangesandsemeffectsofthreedifferentimplantsabutmentconnectionduringdebridementwitheryaglaseranexvivostudy
AT dominiakmarzena temperaturechangesandsemeffectsofthreedifferentimplantsabutmentconnectionduringdebridementwitheryaglaseranexvivostudy