Cargando…

Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials

The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear properties of resin teeth with different opposing dental restorative materials. One type of resin tooth (Trubyte Biotone) was tested against six types of restorative materials including type III gold alloy (GO), monolithic zirconia (MZ), lithium disilic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Seunglee, Choi, Jae-Won, Jeong, Chang-Mo, Huh, Jung-Bo, Lee, So-Hyoun, Lee, Hyeonjong, Yun, Mi-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223684
_version_ 1783475174168854528
author Jin, Seunglee
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Lee, Hyeonjong
Yun, Mi-Jung
author_facet Jin, Seunglee
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Lee, Hyeonjong
Yun, Mi-Jung
author_sort Jin, Seunglee
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear properties of resin teeth with different opposing dental restorative materials. One type of resin tooth (Trubyte Biotone) was tested against six types of restorative materials including type III gold alloy (GO), monolithic zirconia (MZ), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), nickel–chromium alloy (NC), feldspathic ceramic (FC), and steatite (ST). Two-body wear tests were performed under a vertical load of 5 kgf and thermo-cycling at 5/55 °C with a total of 120,000 cycles. The wear amount was quantified by measuring the volume loss of the resin teeth and the vertical substance loss of the opposing materials using three-dimensional images. The FC group showed a significantly greater amount of wear of the resin teeth, followed by the ST, NC, LD, MZ, and GO groups. The GO group showed significantly less wear of resin teeth than the other groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the wear of opposing restorative materials between groups. Within the limits of this study, it is recommended that zirconia, rather than feldspathic ceramic, should be used for restorations in the esthetic zone, and gold alloy should be used for areas with little or no esthetic demand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6888201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68882012019-12-09 Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials Jin, Seunglee Choi, Jae-Won Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo Lee, So-Hyoun Lee, Hyeonjong Yun, Mi-Jung Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear properties of resin teeth with different opposing dental restorative materials. One type of resin tooth (Trubyte Biotone) was tested against six types of restorative materials including type III gold alloy (GO), monolithic zirconia (MZ), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), nickel–chromium alloy (NC), feldspathic ceramic (FC), and steatite (ST). Two-body wear tests were performed under a vertical load of 5 kgf and thermo-cycling at 5/55 °C with a total of 120,000 cycles. The wear amount was quantified by measuring the volume loss of the resin teeth and the vertical substance loss of the opposing materials using three-dimensional images. The FC group showed a significantly greater amount of wear of the resin teeth, followed by the ST, NC, LD, MZ, and GO groups. The GO group showed significantly less wear of resin teeth than the other groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the wear of opposing restorative materials between groups. Within the limits of this study, it is recommended that zirconia, rather than feldspathic ceramic, should be used for restorations in the esthetic zone, and gold alloy should be used for areas with little or no esthetic demand. MDPI 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6888201/ /pubmed/31717309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223684 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jin, Seunglee
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Huh, Jung-Bo
Lee, So-Hyoun
Lee, Hyeonjong
Yun, Mi-Jung
Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title_full Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title_fullStr Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title_short Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
title_sort evaluating the wear of resin teeth by different opposing restorative materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223684
work_keys_str_mv AT jinseunglee evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT choijaewon evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT jeongchangmo evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT huhjungbo evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT leesohyoun evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT leehyeonjong evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials
AT yunmijung evaluatingthewearofresinteethbydifferentopposingrestorativematerials