Cargando…

Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material

The effects or high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator on cementless grouting material were investigated through Labiles Waterglass (LW) grouting applied at an actual construction field. Circulating fluidized bed combustion ash was used as CaO fly ash, and petro cokes desulfurization gypsum was used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jaehyun, Lee, Taegyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223664
_version_ 1783475226463436800
author Lee, Jaehyun
Lee, Taegyu
author_facet Lee, Jaehyun
Lee, Taegyu
author_sort Lee, Jaehyun
collection PubMed
description The effects or high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator on cementless grouting material were investigated through Labiles Waterglass (LW) grouting applied at an actual construction field. Circulating fluidized bed combustion ash was used as CaO fly ash, and petro cokes desulfurization gypsum was used as sulfate activator. Cementless grouting material (CGM) could decrease the gel time by about 16.7% compared with ordinary Portland cement (OPC). This characteristic improved the average daily workload and construction period per meter by about 13.5% with CGM. Furthermore, when constructing 1000 holes of LW grouting, the construction time could be reduced by 19 days (20% of the total construction period of LW grouting). Meanwhile, CGM could increase the homogel strength by about 48.4% after 28 days compared with OPC. After X-ray diffraction analysis and scanning electron microscope analysis, CGM was found to produce cement hydrate by chemical reaction mechanism of high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator, even though cement was not used. The matrix structure properties of CGM and OPC specimens were similar, but CGM, with 134.3% fineness, exhibited higher compressive strength and lower air permeability than OPC. As a result, CGM could reduce the leakage length per square meter by 74.4% compared with OPC. Using CGM as a substitute for OPC in LW grouting in actual sites could be beneficial in terms of securing construction speed and durability, as well as reducing CO(2) emissions due to reduction of OPC usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6888419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68884192019-12-09 Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material Lee, Jaehyun Lee, Taegyu Materials (Basel) Article The effects or high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator on cementless grouting material were investigated through Labiles Waterglass (LW) grouting applied at an actual construction field. Circulating fluidized bed combustion ash was used as CaO fly ash, and petro cokes desulfurization gypsum was used as sulfate activator. Cementless grouting material (CGM) could decrease the gel time by about 16.7% compared with ordinary Portland cement (OPC). This characteristic improved the average daily workload and construction period per meter by about 13.5% with CGM. Furthermore, when constructing 1000 holes of LW grouting, the construction time could be reduced by 19 days (20% of the total construction period of LW grouting). Meanwhile, CGM could increase the homogel strength by about 48.4% after 28 days compared with OPC. After X-ray diffraction analysis and scanning electron microscope analysis, CGM was found to produce cement hydrate by chemical reaction mechanism of high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator, even though cement was not used. The matrix structure properties of CGM and OPC specimens were similar, but CGM, with 134.3% fineness, exhibited higher compressive strength and lower air permeability than OPC. As a result, CGM could reduce the leakage length per square meter by 74.4% compared with OPC. Using CGM as a substitute for OPC in LW grouting in actual sites could be beneficial in terms of securing construction speed and durability, as well as reducing CO(2) emissions due to reduction of OPC usage. MDPI 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6888419/ /pubmed/31703333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223664 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jaehyun
Lee, Taegyu
Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title_full Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title_fullStr Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title_full_unstemmed Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title_short Effects of High CaO Fly Ash and Sulfate Activator as a Finer Binder for Cementless Grouting Material
title_sort effects of high cao fly ash and sulfate activator as a finer binder for cementless grouting material
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12223664
work_keys_str_mv AT leejaehyun effectsofhighcaoflyashandsulfateactivatorasafinerbinderforcementlessgroutingmaterial
AT leetaegyu effectsofhighcaoflyashandsulfateactivatorasafinerbinderforcementlessgroutingmaterial