Cargando…

The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity

Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Carly, Barron, David, Smyth, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443
_version_ 1783475241640525824
author Wood, Carly
Barron, David
Smyth, Nina
author_facet Wood, Carly
Barron, David
Smyth, Nina
author_sort Wood, Carly
collection PubMed
description Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and retrospective (RNES-II) version of the Nature Exposure Scale to incorporate GE and to examine their factor structure and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored the factor structure of the scales; followed by confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the model fit. Fit indices for the one factor five item NES-II and RNES-II models identified by EFA were poor. Use of modification indices resulted in a good model fit; NES-II: χ(5, n = 385) = 2.638; χ(normed) = 0.879; CFI= 1.000; RMSEA < 0.001 with 90%CI = 0.000–0.082; SRMR = 0.009; AIC = 36.638. RNES-II: χ(2, n = 385) = 7.149; χ(normed) = 3.574; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.082 with 90%CI = 0.023–0.151; SRMR = 0.015; AIC = 43.149. Both models demonstrated very good reliability (α = 0.84; 89 respectively). These findings indicate that the scales can be used to assess current and retrospective nature exposure. However, due to the removal of item one, the authors recommend that the scales be named the ‘intentional nature exposure scale’ and ‘retrospective intentional nature exposure scale’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6888483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68884832019-12-09 The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity Wood, Carly Barron, David Smyth, Nina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and retrospective (RNES-II) version of the Nature Exposure Scale to incorporate GE and to examine their factor structure and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored the factor structure of the scales; followed by confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the model fit. Fit indices for the one factor five item NES-II and RNES-II models identified by EFA were poor. Use of modification indices resulted in a good model fit; NES-II: χ(5, n = 385) = 2.638; χ(normed) = 0.879; CFI= 1.000; RMSEA < 0.001 with 90%CI = 0.000–0.082; SRMR = 0.009; AIC = 36.638. RNES-II: χ(2, n = 385) = 7.149; χ(normed) = 3.574; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.082 with 90%CI = 0.023–0.151; SRMR = 0.015; AIC = 43.149. Both models demonstrated very good reliability (α = 0.84; 89 respectively). These findings indicate that the scales can be used to assess current and retrospective nature exposure. However, due to the removal of item one, the authors recommend that the scales be named the ‘intentional nature exposure scale’ and ‘retrospective intentional nature exposure scale’. MDPI 2019-11-12 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6888483/ /pubmed/31726784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wood, Carly
Barron, David
Smyth, Nina
The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title_full The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title_fullStr The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title_full_unstemmed The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title_short The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
title_sort current and retrospective intentional nature exposure scales: development and factorial validity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443
work_keys_str_mv AT woodcarly thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity
AT barrondavid thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity
AT smythnina thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity
AT woodcarly currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity
AT barrondavid currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity
AT smythnina currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity