Cargando…
The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity
Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443 |
_version_ | 1783475241640525824 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Carly Barron, David Smyth, Nina |
author_facet | Wood, Carly Barron, David Smyth, Nina |
author_sort | Wood, Carly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and retrospective (RNES-II) version of the Nature Exposure Scale to incorporate GE and to examine their factor structure and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored the factor structure of the scales; followed by confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the model fit. Fit indices for the one factor five item NES-II and RNES-II models identified by EFA were poor. Use of modification indices resulted in a good model fit; NES-II: χ(5, n = 385) = 2.638; χ(normed) = 0.879; CFI= 1.000; RMSEA < 0.001 with 90%CI = 0.000–0.082; SRMR = 0.009; AIC = 36.638. RNES-II: χ(2, n = 385) = 7.149; χ(normed) = 3.574; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.082 with 90%CI = 0.023–0.151; SRMR = 0.015; AIC = 43.149. Both models demonstrated very good reliability (α = 0.84; 89 respectively). These findings indicate that the scales can be used to assess current and retrospective nature exposure. However, due to the removal of item one, the authors recommend that the scales be named the ‘intentional nature exposure scale’ and ‘retrospective intentional nature exposure scale’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6888483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68884832019-12-09 The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity Wood, Carly Barron, David Smyth, Nina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Both nature exposure and green exercise (GE) can improve health. However, there are no scales examining frequency of engagement; or that consider interaction with nature. There are also no scales assessing these variables during childhood. The aim of this study was to develop a modified (NES-II) and retrospective (RNES-II) version of the Nature Exposure Scale to incorporate GE and to examine their factor structure and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored the factor structure of the scales; followed by confirmatory factor analysis to confirm the model fit. Fit indices for the one factor five item NES-II and RNES-II models identified by EFA were poor. Use of modification indices resulted in a good model fit; NES-II: χ(5, n = 385) = 2.638; χ(normed) = 0.879; CFI= 1.000; RMSEA < 0.001 with 90%CI = 0.000–0.082; SRMR = 0.009; AIC = 36.638. RNES-II: χ(2, n = 385) = 7.149; χ(normed) = 3.574; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.082 with 90%CI = 0.023–0.151; SRMR = 0.015; AIC = 43.149. Both models demonstrated very good reliability (α = 0.84; 89 respectively). These findings indicate that the scales can be used to assess current and retrospective nature exposure. However, due to the removal of item one, the authors recommend that the scales be named the ‘intentional nature exposure scale’ and ‘retrospective intentional nature exposure scale’. MDPI 2019-11-12 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6888483/ /pubmed/31726784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wood, Carly Barron, David Smyth, Nina The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title | The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title_full | The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title_fullStr | The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title_short | The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and Factorial Validity |
title_sort | current and retrospective intentional nature exposure scales: development and factorial validity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6888483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31726784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodcarly thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity AT barrondavid thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity AT smythnina thecurrentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity AT woodcarly currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity AT barrondavid currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity AT smythnina currentandretrospectiveintentionalnatureexposurescalesdevelopmentandfactorialvalidity |