Cargando…
Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyd...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9 |
_version_ | 1783475426651275264 |
---|---|
author | McCowan, Colin McSkimming, Paula Papworth, Richard Kotzur, Marie McConnachie, Alex Macdonald, Sara Wyke, Sally Crighton, Emilia Campbell, Christine Weller, David Steele, Robert J. C. Robb, Kathryn A. |
author_facet | McCowan, Colin McSkimming, Paula Papworth, Richard Kotzur, Marie McConnachie, Alex Macdonald, Sara Wyke, Sally Crighton, Emilia Campbell, Christine Weller, David Steele, Robert J. C. Robb, Kathryn A. |
author_sort | McCowan, Colin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board. Participation in the screening programmes was measured by attendance at breast or cervical screening or the return of a bowel screening kit. RESULTS: 72.6% of 159,993 women invited attended breast screening, 80.7% of 309,899 women invited attended cervical screening and 61.7% of 180,408 women invited completed bowel screening. Of the 68,324 women invited to participate in all three screening programmes during the study period, 52.1% participated in all three while 7.2% participated in none. Women who participated in breast (OR = 3.34 (3.21, 3.47), p < 0.001) or cervical (OR = 3.48 (3.32, 3.65), p < 0.001) were more likely to participate in bowel screening. CONCLUSION: Participation in bowel screening was lower than breast or cervical for this population although the same demographic factors were associated with uptake, namely lower social deprivation, increasing age, low levels of comorbidity and prior non-malignant neoplasms. As women who complete breast and cervical are more likely to also complete bowel screening, interventions at these procedures to encourage bowel screening participation should be explored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6889480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68894802019-12-04 Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study McCowan, Colin McSkimming, Paula Papworth, Richard Kotzur, Marie McConnachie, Alex Macdonald, Sara Wyke, Sally Crighton, Emilia Campbell, Christine Weller, David Steele, Robert J. C. Robb, Kathryn A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board. Participation in the screening programmes was measured by attendance at breast or cervical screening or the return of a bowel screening kit. RESULTS: 72.6% of 159,993 women invited attended breast screening, 80.7% of 309,899 women invited attended cervical screening and 61.7% of 180,408 women invited completed bowel screening. Of the 68,324 women invited to participate in all three screening programmes during the study period, 52.1% participated in all three while 7.2% participated in none. Women who participated in breast (OR = 3.34 (3.21, 3.47), p < 0.001) or cervical (OR = 3.48 (3.32, 3.65), p < 0.001) were more likely to participate in bowel screening. CONCLUSION: Participation in bowel screening was lower than breast or cervical for this population although the same demographic factors were associated with uptake, namely lower social deprivation, increasing age, low levels of comorbidity and prior non-malignant neoplasms. As women who complete breast and cervical are more likely to also complete bowel screening, interventions at these procedures to encourage bowel screening participation should be explored. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-04 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6889480/ /pubmed/31481732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article McCowan, Colin McSkimming, Paula Papworth, Richard Kotzur, Marie McConnachie, Alex Macdonald, Sara Wyke, Sally Crighton, Emilia Campbell, Christine Weller, David Steele, Robert J. C. Robb, Kathryn A. Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccowancolin comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT mcskimmingpaula comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT papworthrichard comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT kotzurmarie comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT mcconnachiealex comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT macdonaldsara comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wykesally comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT crightonemilia comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT campbellchristine comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wellerdavid comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT steelerobertjc comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy AT robbkathryna comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy |