Cargando…

Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCowan, Colin, McSkimming, Paula, Papworth, Richard, Kotzur, Marie, McConnachie, Alex, Macdonald, Sara, Wyke, Sally, Crighton, Emilia, Campbell, Christine, Weller, David, Steele, Robert J. C., Robb, Kathryn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9
_version_ 1783475426651275264
author McCowan, Colin
McSkimming, Paula
Papworth, Richard
Kotzur, Marie
McConnachie, Alex
Macdonald, Sara
Wyke, Sally
Crighton, Emilia
Campbell, Christine
Weller, David
Steele, Robert J. C.
Robb, Kathryn A.
author_facet McCowan, Colin
McSkimming, Paula
Papworth, Richard
Kotzur, Marie
McConnachie, Alex
Macdonald, Sara
Wyke, Sally
Crighton, Emilia
Campbell, Christine
Weller, David
Steele, Robert J. C.
Robb, Kathryn A.
author_sort McCowan, Colin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board. Participation in the screening programmes was measured by attendance at breast or cervical screening or the return of a bowel screening kit. RESULTS: 72.6% of 159,993 women invited attended breast screening, 80.7% of 309,899 women invited attended cervical screening and 61.7% of 180,408 women invited completed bowel screening. Of the 68,324 women invited to participate in all three screening programmes during the study period, 52.1% participated in all three while 7.2% participated in none. Women who participated in breast (OR = 3.34 (3.21, 3.47), p < 0.001) or cervical (OR = 3.48 (3.32, 3.65), p < 0.001) were more likely to participate in bowel screening. CONCLUSION: Participation in bowel screening was lower than breast or cervical for this population although the same demographic factors were associated with uptake, namely lower social deprivation, increasing age, low levels of comorbidity and prior non-malignant neoplasms. As women who complete breast and cervical are more likely to also complete bowel screening, interventions at these procedures to encourage bowel screening participation should be explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6889480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68894802019-12-04 Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study McCowan, Colin McSkimming, Paula Papworth, Richard Kotzur, Marie McConnachie, Alex Macdonald, Sara Wyke, Sally Crighton, Emilia Campbell, Christine Weller, David Steele, Robert J. C. Robb, Kathryn A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening. METHODS: Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board. Participation in the screening programmes was measured by attendance at breast or cervical screening or the return of a bowel screening kit. RESULTS: 72.6% of 159,993 women invited attended breast screening, 80.7% of 309,899 women invited attended cervical screening and 61.7% of 180,408 women invited completed bowel screening. Of the 68,324 women invited to participate in all three screening programmes during the study period, 52.1% participated in all three while 7.2% participated in none. Women who participated in breast (OR = 3.34 (3.21, 3.47), p < 0.001) or cervical (OR = 3.48 (3.32, 3.65), p < 0.001) were more likely to participate in bowel screening. CONCLUSION: Participation in bowel screening was lower than breast or cervical for this population although the same demographic factors were associated with uptake, namely lower social deprivation, increasing age, low levels of comorbidity and prior non-malignant neoplasms. As women who complete breast and cervical are more likely to also complete bowel screening, interventions at these procedures to encourage bowel screening participation should be explored. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-04 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6889480/ /pubmed/31481732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McCowan, Colin
McSkimming, Paula
Papworth, Richard
Kotzur, Marie
McConnachie, Alex
Macdonald, Sara
Wyke, Sally
Crighton, Emilia
Campbell, Christine
Weller, David
Steele, Robert J. C.
Robb, Kathryn A.
Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mccowancolin comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mcskimmingpaula comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT papworthrichard comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kotzurmarie comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mcconnachiealex comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT macdonaldsara comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wykesally comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT crightonemilia comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT campbellchristine comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wellerdavid comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT steelerobertjc comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT robbkathryna comparinguptakeacrossbreastcervicalandbowelscreeningatanindividuallevelaretrospectivecohortstudy