Cargando…

Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huijs, Jenny J. J. M., Houtman, Irene L. D., Blonk, Roland W. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5
_version_ 1783475438794833920
author Huijs, Jenny J. J. M.
Houtman, Irene L. D.
Blonk, Roland W. B.
author_facet Huijs, Jenny J. J. M.
Houtman, Irene L. D.
Blonk, Roland W. B.
author_sort Huijs, Jenny J. J. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-factor structure: developmental proactivity, work engagement and perceived appreciation. METHODS: We use data from employees (N = 867) of five different organizations in the Netherlands. Mental retirement was assessed with 11 items in an online survey. In addition, socio-demographic characteristics like age, level of education and occupation, were measured. Next to tests of internal consistency, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is performed to test the three-factor structure of mental retirement in this population and in different subgroups (age, education, occupation). RESULTS: The internal consistency varies from .80 to .94 for the developmental proactivity scale and the work engagement scale, respectively (appreciation was measured with one item). For the CFA, the three-factor model fits the data adequately. Multiple group analyses also shows equal factor loadings in all subgroups, but the mean levels of mental retirement differ across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the three-factor model of mental retirement in a general group of employees as well as across different subgroups. However, this study only tested the construct validity. Future research should study validity more extensively and be longitudinal in nature. In addition, the causal chain of antecedent variables to mental retirement and its outcomes should be considered. These studies could also focus on the effects of interventions aiming at preventing or decreasing the level of mental retirement in organizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6889537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68895372019-12-11 Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. Houtman, Irene L. D. Blonk, Roland W. B. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-factor structure: developmental proactivity, work engagement and perceived appreciation. METHODS: We use data from employees (N = 867) of five different organizations in the Netherlands. Mental retirement was assessed with 11 items in an online survey. In addition, socio-demographic characteristics like age, level of education and occupation, were measured. Next to tests of internal consistency, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is performed to test the three-factor structure of mental retirement in this population and in different subgroups (age, education, occupation). RESULTS: The internal consistency varies from .80 to .94 for the developmental proactivity scale and the work engagement scale, respectively (appreciation was measured with one item). For the CFA, the three-factor model fits the data adequately. Multiple group analyses also shows equal factor loadings in all subgroups, but the mean levels of mental retirement differ across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the three-factor model of mental retirement in a general group of employees as well as across different subgroups. However, this study only tested the construct validity. Future research should study validity more extensively and be longitudinal in nature. In addition, the causal chain of antecedent variables to mental retirement and its outcomes should be considered. These studies could also focus on the effects of interventions aiming at preventing or decreasing the level of mental retirement in organizations. BioMed Central 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6889537/ /pubmed/31791287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huijs, Jenny J. J. M.
Houtman, Irene L. D.
Blonk, Roland W. B.
Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title_full Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title_fullStr Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title_full_unstemmed Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title_short Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
title_sort development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5
work_keys_str_mv AT huijsjennyjjm developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups
AT houtmanireneld developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups
AT blonkrolandwb developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups