Cargando…
Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5 |
_version_ | 1783475438794833920 |
---|---|
author | Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. Houtman, Irene L. D. Blonk, Roland W. B. |
author_facet | Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. Houtman, Irene L. D. Blonk, Roland W. B. |
author_sort | Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-factor structure: developmental proactivity, work engagement and perceived appreciation. METHODS: We use data from employees (N = 867) of five different organizations in the Netherlands. Mental retirement was assessed with 11 items in an online survey. In addition, socio-demographic characteristics like age, level of education and occupation, were measured. Next to tests of internal consistency, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is performed to test the three-factor structure of mental retirement in this population and in different subgroups (age, education, occupation). RESULTS: The internal consistency varies from .80 to .94 for the developmental proactivity scale and the work engagement scale, respectively (appreciation was measured with one item). For the CFA, the three-factor model fits the data adequately. Multiple group analyses also shows equal factor loadings in all subgroups, but the mean levels of mental retirement differ across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the three-factor model of mental retirement in a general group of employees as well as across different subgroups. However, this study only tested the construct validity. Future research should study validity more extensively and be longitudinal in nature. In addition, the causal chain of antecedent variables to mental retirement and its outcomes should be considered. These studies could also focus on the effects of interventions aiming at preventing or decreasing the level of mental retirement in organizations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6889537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68895372019-12-11 Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. Houtman, Irene L. D. Blonk, Roland W. B. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to develop a new measure for the concept of mental retirement and test the construct validity of the measure. Employees who are ‘mentally retired’ are present at their work physically, but have already said their goodbyes mentally. Mental retirement has a three-factor structure: developmental proactivity, work engagement and perceived appreciation. METHODS: We use data from employees (N = 867) of five different organizations in the Netherlands. Mental retirement was assessed with 11 items in an online survey. In addition, socio-demographic characteristics like age, level of education and occupation, were measured. Next to tests of internal consistency, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is performed to test the three-factor structure of mental retirement in this population and in different subgroups (age, education, occupation). RESULTS: The internal consistency varies from .80 to .94 for the developmental proactivity scale and the work engagement scale, respectively (appreciation was measured with one item). For the CFA, the three-factor model fits the data adequately. Multiple group analyses also shows equal factor loadings in all subgroups, but the mean levels of mental retirement differ across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the three-factor model of mental retirement in a general group of employees as well as across different subgroups. However, this study only tested the construct validity. Future research should study validity more extensively and be longitudinal in nature. In addition, the causal chain of antecedent variables to mental retirement and its outcomes should be considered. These studies could also focus on the effects of interventions aiming at preventing or decreasing the level of mental retirement in organizations. BioMed Central 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6889537/ /pubmed/31791287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huijs, Jenny J. J. M. Houtman, Irene L. D. Blonk, Roland W. B. Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title | Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title_full | Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title_fullStr | Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title_short | Development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
title_sort | development of a new measure for mental retirement; testing of a three-factor structure of mentale retirement in different subgroups |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7649-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huijsjennyjjm developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups AT houtmanireneld developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups AT blonkrolandwb developmentofanewmeasureformentalretirementtestingofathreefactorstructureofmentaleretirementindifferentsubgroups |