Cargando…

A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Jane, Jones, Sophie, Gatton, Michelle L., Barnwell, John W., Cheng, Qin, Chiodini, Peter L., Glenn, Jeffrey, Incardona, Sandra, Kosack, Cara, Luchavez, Jennifer, Menard, Didier, Nhem, Sina, Oyibo, Wellington, Rees-Channer, Roxanne R., Gonzalez, Iveth, Bell, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z
_version_ 1783475453577658368
author Cunningham, Jane
Jones, Sophie
Gatton, Michelle L.
Barnwell, John W.
Cheng, Qin
Chiodini, Peter L.
Glenn, Jeffrey
Incardona, Sandra
Kosack, Cara
Luchavez, Jennifer
Menard, Didier
Nhem, Sina
Oyibo, Wellington
Rees-Channer, Roxanne R.
Gonzalez, Iveth
Bell, David
author_facet Cunningham, Jane
Jones, Sophie
Gatton, Michelle L.
Barnwell, John W.
Cheng, Qin
Chiodini, Peter L.
Glenn, Jeffrey
Incardona, Sandra
Kosack, Cara
Luchavez, Jennifer
Menard, Didier
Nhem, Sina
Oyibo, Wellington
Rees-Channer, Roxanne R.
Gonzalez, Iveth
Bell, David
author_sort Cunningham, Jane
collection PubMed
description Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6889598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68895982019-12-11 A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy Cunningham, Jane Jones, Sophie Gatton, Michelle L. Barnwell, John W. Cheng, Qin Chiodini, Peter L. Glenn, Jeffrey Incardona, Sandra Kosack, Cara Luchavez, Jennifer Menard, Didier Nhem, Sina Oyibo, Wellington Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. Gonzalez, Iveth Bell, David Malar J Review Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics. BioMed Central 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6889598/ /pubmed/31791354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Cunningham, Jane
Jones, Sophie
Gatton, Michelle L.
Barnwell, John W.
Cheng, Qin
Chiodini, Peter L.
Glenn, Jeffrey
Incardona, Sandra
Kosack, Cara
Luchavez, Jennifer
Menard, Didier
Nhem, Sina
Oyibo, Wellington
Rees-Channer, Roxanne R.
Gonzalez, Iveth
Bell, David
A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title_full A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title_fullStr A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title_full_unstemmed A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title_short A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
title_sort review of the who malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamjane areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT jonessophie areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT gattonmichellel areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT barnwelljohnw areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT chengqin areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT chiodinipeterl areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT glennjeffrey areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT incardonasandra areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT kosackcara areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT luchavezjennifer areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT menarddidier areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT nhemsina areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT oyibowellington areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT reeschannerroxanner areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT gonzaleziveth areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT belldavid areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT cunninghamjane reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT jonessophie reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT gattonmichellel reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT barnwelljohnw reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT chengqin reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT chiodinipeterl reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT glennjeffrey reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT incardonasandra reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT kosackcara reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT luchavezjennifer reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT menarddidier reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT nhemsina reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT oyibowellington reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT reeschannerroxanner reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT gonzaleziveth reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy
AT belldavid reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy