Cargando…
A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member St...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z |
_version_ | 1783475453577658368 |
---|---|
author | Cunningham, Jane Jones, Sophie Gatton, Michelle L. Barnwell, John W. Cheng, Qin Chiodini, Peter L. Glenn, Jeffrey Incardona, Sandra Kosack, Cara Luchavez, Jennifer Menard, Didier Nhem, Sina Oyibo, Wellington Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. Gonzalez, Iveth Bell, David |
author_facet | Cunningham, Jane Jones, Sophie Gatton, Michelle L. Barnwell, John W. Cheng, Qin Chiodini, Peter L. Glenn, Jeffrey Incardona, Sandra Kosack, Cara Luchavez, Jennifer Menard, Didier Nhem, Sina Oyibo, Wellington Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. Gonzalez, Iveth Bell, David |
author_sort | Cunningham, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6889598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68895982019-12-11 A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy Cunningham, Jane Jones, Sophie Gatton, Michelle L. Barnwell, John W. Cheng, Qin Chiodini, Peter L. Glenn, Jeffrey Incardona, Sandra Kosack, Cara Luchavez, Jennifer Menard, Didier Nhem, Sina Oyibo, Wellington Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. Gonzalez, Iveth Bell, David Malar J Review Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) emerged in the early 1990s into largely unregulated markets, and uncertain field performance was a major concern for the acceptance of tests for malaria case management. This, combined with the need to guide procurement decisions of UN agencies and WHO Member States, led to the creation of an independent, internationally coordinated RDT evaluation programme aiming to provide comparative performance data of commercially available RDTs. Products were assessed against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax samples diluted to two densities, along with malaria-negative samples from healthy individuals, and from people with immunological abnormalities or non-malarial infections. Three measures were established as indicators of performance, (i) panel detection score (PDS) determined against low density panels prepared from P. falciparum and P. vivax wild-type samples, (ii) false positive rate, and (iii) invalid rate, and minimum criteria defined. Over eight rounds of the programme, 332 products were tested. Between Rounds 1 and 8, substantial improvements were seen in all performance measures. The number of products meeting all criteria increased from 26.8% (11/41) in Round 1, to 79.4% (27/34) in Round 8. While products submitted to further evaluation rounds under compulsory re-testing did not show improvement, those voluntarily resubmitted showed significant increases in P. falciparum (p = 0.002) and P. vivax PDS (p < 0.001), with more products meeting the criteria upon re-testing. Through this programme, the differentiation of products based on comparative performance, combined with policy changes has been influential in the acceptance of malaria RDTs as a case-management tool, enabling a policy of parasite-based diagnosis prior to treatment. Publication of product testing results has produced a transparent market allowing users and procurers to clearly identify appropriate products for their situation, and could form a model for introduction of other, broad-scale diagnostics. BioMed Central 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6889598/ /pubmed/31791354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Cunningham, Jane Jones, Sophie Gatton, Michelle L. Barnwell, John W. Cheng, Qin Chiodini, Peter L. Glenn, Jeffrey Incardona, Sandra Kosack, Cara Luchavez, Jennifer Menard, Didier Nhem, Sina Oyibo, Wellington Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. Gonzalez, Iveth Bell, David A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title | A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title_full | A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title_fullStr | A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title_short | A review of the WHO malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
title_sort | review of the who malaria rapid diagnostic test product testing programme (2008–2018): performance, procurement and policy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6889598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3028-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cunninghamjane areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT jonessophie areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT gattonmichellel areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT barnwelljohnw areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT chengqin areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT chiodinipeterl areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT glennjeffrey areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT incardonasandra areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT kosackcara areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT luchavezjennifer areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT menarddidier areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT nhemsina areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT oyibowellington areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT reeschannerroxanner areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT gonzaleziveth areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT belldavid areviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT cunninghamjane reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT jonessophie reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT gattonmichellel reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT barnwelljohnw reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT chengqin reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT chiodinipeterl reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT glennjeffrey reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT incardonasandra reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT kosackcara reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT luchavezjennifer reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT menarddidier reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT nhemsina reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT oyibowellington reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT reeschannerroxanner reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT gonzaleziveth reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy AT belldavid reviewofthewhomalariarapiddiagnostictestproducttestingprogramme20082018performanceprocurementandpolicy |