Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis
PURPOSE: Controversies exist for which treatment is optimal for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (SR), or transplantation (LT). We compared outcomes between treatments as first-line therapy for HCC patients measuring up to 5 cm or different canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S224809 |
_version_ | 1783475563130781696 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Wei-Jia Zhu, Gui-Qi Wu, Yi-Ming Wang, Wen-Wen Bai, Bing-Long |
author_facet | Zhao, Wei-Jia Zhu, Gui-Qi Wu, Yi-Ming Wang, Wen-Wen Bai, Bing-Long |
author_sort | Zhao, Wei-Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Controversies exist for which treatment is optimal for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (SR), or transplantation (LT). We compared outcomes between treatments as first-line therapy for HCC patients measuring up to 5 cm or different cancer risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was retrieved for HCC patients treated with RFA, SR, or LT between 2004 and 2015. The effects of three treatments were compared using propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weights adjustment, and instrumental variable analysis for overall survival (OS) and competing risks regression models for disease-specific survival (DSS). We also evaluated whether the effect of treatments varied according to baseline clinical characteristics by locally weighted regression method. RESULTS: Of 7664 patients, RFA and SR yielded worse OS (HR 1.67, CI 1.43–1.70, P<0.001; HR 1.43, CI 1.40–1.67, P<0.001) and DSS (HR 2.00, CI 1.10–3.30, P<0.011; HR 2.50, CI 2.00–3.30, P<0.001) than LT. In patients with small tumors, SR may confer more survival benefits than RFA (HR>1) for different tumor sizes measuring up to 5 cm and may be an appropriate first-line treatment. Additionally, RFA has more survival benefits compared with SR (HR 0.83, CI 0.53–1.25) for those patients with low tumor risk and good general health condition (without any prognostic risk factors). However, those patients with a predicted 5-year overall mortality risk >30% seem to benefit more for SR than RFA. CONCLUSION: Due to a shortage of donors, RFA and SR can be applied as either primary management of HCC or as a bridging therapy for LT. Furthermore, SR is an effective option for patients with different HCC tumor size. However, RFA could achieve comparable survival benefits with SR for patients without any risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6890195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68901952019-12-09 Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis Zhao, Wei-Jia Zhu, Gui-Qi Wu, Yi-Ming Wang, Wen-Wen Bai, Bing-Long Onco Targets Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Controversies exist for which treatment is optimal for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (SR), or transplantation (LT). We compared outcomes between treatments as first-line therapy for HCC patients measuring up to 5 cm or different cancer risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was retrieved for HCC patients treated with RFA, SR, or LT between 2004 and 2015. The effects of three treatments were compared using propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weights adjustment, and instrumental variable analysis for overall survival (OS) and competing risks regression models for disease-specific survival (DSS). We also evaluated whether the effect of treatments varied according to baseline clinical characteristics by locally weighted regression method. RESULTS: Of 7664 patients, RFA and SR yielded worse OS (HR 1.67, CI 1.43–1.70, P<0.001; HR 1.43, CI 1.40–1.67, P<0.001) and DSS (HR 2.00, CI 1.10–3.30, P<0.011; HR 2.50, CI 2.00–3.30, P<0.001) than LT. In patients with small tumors, SR may confer more survival benefits than RFA (HR>1) for different tumor sizes measuring up to 5 cm and may be an appropriate first-line treatment. Additionally, RFA has more survival benefits compared with SR (HR 0.83, CI 0.53–1.25) for those patients with low tumor risk and good general health condition (without any prognostic risk factors). However, those patients with a predicted 5-year overall mortality risk >30% seem to benefit more for SR than RFA. CONCLUSION: Due to a shortage of donors, RFA and SR can be applied as either primary management of HCC or as a bridging therapy for LT. Furthermore, SR is an effective option for patients with different HCC tumor size. However, RFA could achieve comparable survival benefits with SR for patients without any risk factors. Dove 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6890195/ /pubmed/31819521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S224809 Text en © 2019 Zhao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhao, Wei-Jia Zhu, Gui-Qi Wu, Yi-Ming Wang, Wen-Wen Bai, Bing-Long Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation, surgical resection and transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma by cancer risk groups: results of propensity score-weighted analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819521 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S224809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoweijia comparativeeffectivenessofradiofrequencyablationsurgicalresectionandtransplantationforearlyhepatocellularcarcinomabycancerriskgroupsresultsofpropensityscoreweightedanalysis AT zhuguiqi comparativeeffectivenessofradiofrequencyablationsurgicalresectionandtransplantationforearlyhepatocellularcarcinomabycancerriskgroupsresultsofpropensityscoreweightedanalysis AT wuyiming comparativeeffectivenessofradiofrequencyablationsurgicalresectionandtransplantationforearlyhepatocellularcarcinomabycancerriskgroupsresultsofpropensityscoreweightedanalysis AT wangwenwen comparativeeffectivenessofradiofrequencyablationsurgicalresectionandtransplantationforearlyhepatocellularcarcinomabycancerriskgroupsresultsofpropensityscoreweightedanalysis AT baibinglong comparativeeffectivenessofradiofrequencyablationsurgicalresectionandtransplantationforearlyhepatocellularcarcinomabycancerriskgroupsresultsofpropensityscoreweightedanalysis |