Cargando…

Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer

Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wan-Yu, Chen, Tseng-Cheng, Lai, Shih-Fan, Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang, Huang, Bing-Shen, Wang, Chun-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962
_version_ 1783475574907338752
author Chen, Wan-Yu
Chen, Tseng-Cheng
Lai, Shih-Fan
Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang
Huang, Bing-Shen
Wang, Chun-Wei
author_facet Chen, Wan-Yu
Chen, Tseng-Cheng
Lai, Shih-Fan
Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang
Huang, Bing-Shen
Wang, Chun-Wei
author_sort Chen, Wan-Yu
collection PubMed
description Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-three N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT may achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Caution should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68902602019-12-13 Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer Chen, Wan-Yu Chen, Tseng-Cheng Lai, Shih-Fan Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang Huang, Bing-Shen Wang, Chun-Wei PLoS One Research Article Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-three N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT may achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Caution should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients. Public Library of Science 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6890260/ /pubmed/31794576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Wan-Yu
Chen, Tseng-Cheng
Lai, Shih-Fan
Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang
Huang, Bing-Shen
Wang, Chun-Wei
Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title_full Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title_short Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
title_sort outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (n3) head and neck cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962
work_keys_str_mv AT chenwanyu outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer
AT chentsengcheng outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer
AT laishihfan outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer
AT liangtonyhsiangkuang outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer
AT huangbingshen outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer
AT wangchunwei outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer