Cargando…
Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer
Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962 |
_version_ | 1783475574907338752 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Wan-Yu Chen, Tseng-Cheng Lai, Shih-Fan Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang Huang, Bing-Shen Wang, Chun-Wei |
author_facet | Chen, Wan-Yu Chen, Tseng-Cheng Lai, Shih-Fan Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang Huang, Bing-Shen Wang, Chun-Wei |
author_sort | Chen, Wan-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-three N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT may achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Caution should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6890260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68902602019-12-13 Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer Chen, Wan-Yu Chen, Tseng-Cheng Lai, Shih-Fan Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang Huang, Bing-Shen Wang, Chun-Wei PLoS One Research Article Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-three N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT may achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Caution should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients. Public Library of Science 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6890260/ /pubmed/31794576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Wan-Yu Chen, Tseng-Cheng Lai, Shih-Fan Liang, Tony Hsiang-Kuang Huang, Bing-Shen Wang, Chun-Wei Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title | Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title_full | Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title_fullStr | Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title_short | Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer |
title_sort | outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (n3) head and neck cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225962 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenwanyu outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer AT chentsengcheng outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer AT laishihfan outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer AT liangtonyhsiangkuang outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer AT huangbingshen outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer AT wangchunwei outcomeofbimodalitydefinitivechemoradiationdoesnotdifferfromthatoftrimodalityupfrontneckdissectionfollowedbyadjuvanttreatmentfor6cmlymphnoden3headandneckcancer |