Cargando…

Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact

OBJECTIVES: The comparability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 2D echocardiography (2DE) early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, LVEF measured by CMR and 2DE (Simpson’s method) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwaiger, Johannes P., Reinstadler, Sebastian J., Tiller, Christina, Holzknecht, Magdalena, Reindl, Martin, Mayr, Agnes, Graziadei, Ivo, Müller, Silvana, Metzler, Bernhard, Klug, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06316-3
_version_ 1783475645709287424
author Schwaiger, Johannes P.
Reinstadler, Sebastian J.
Tiller, Christina
Holzknecht, Magdalena
Reindl, Martin
Mayr, Agnes
Graziadei, Ivo
Müller, Silvana
Metzler, Bernhard
Klug, Gert
author_facet Schwaiger, Johannes P.
Reinstadler, Sebastian J.
Tiller, Christina
Holzknecht, Magdalena
Reindl, Martin
Mayr, Agnes
Graziadei, Ivo
Müller, Silvana
Metzler, Bernhard
Klug, Gert
author_sort Schwaiger, Johannes P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The comparability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 2D echocardiography (2DE) early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, LVEF measured by CMR and 2DE (Simpson’s method) were compared in 221 patients after STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. 2DE image quality was systematically assessed and studies reported by an accredited examiner. Intermodality agreement was assessed by the Bland–Altman method. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for heart failure. Patients were followed up for a median of 40.9 months (IQR 28.1–56). RESULTS: After non-anterior STEMI, LVEF measurements by 2DE (single and biplane) were consistently underestimated in comparison to CMR (CMR 55.7 ± 9.5% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.06), 2DE-2CV 52 ± 8% (p < 0.001), 2DE-biplane 53.5 ± 7.1% (p = 0.01)). After anterior STEMI, there was no significant difference in LVEF measurements by 2DE and CMR with acceptable limits of agreement (CMR 49 ± 11% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.8), 2DE-2CV 49 ± 9.2% (p = 0.9), 2DE-biplane 49.6 ± 8% (p = 0.5)). In total, 15% of patients experienced a MACE during follow-up. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, reduced LVEF (< 52%) as assessed by either 2DE or CMR was predictive of MACE (2DE HR = 2.57 (95% CI 1.1–6.2), p = 0.036; CMR HR = 2.51 (95% CI 1.1–5.7), p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: At baseline after non-anterior STEMI, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF in comparison to CMR, whereas after anterior infarction, measurements were within acceptable limits of agreement. Both imaging modalities offered similar prognostic values when a reduced LVEF < 52% was applied. KEY POINTS: • After non-anterior STEMI, 2D-echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF compared with cardiac MRI • An ejection fraction of < 52% in the acute post-infarct period by both 2D echocardiography and CMR offered similar prognostic values
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68906222019-12-26 Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact Schwaiger, Johannes P. Reinstadler, Sebastian J. Tiller, Christina Holzknecht, Magdalena Reindl, Martin Mayr, Agnes Graziadei, Ivo Müller, Silvana Metzler, Bernhard Klug, Gert Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: The comparability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 2D echocardiography (2DE) early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. METHODS: In this study, LVEF measured by CMR and 2DE (Simpson’s method) were compared in 221 patients after STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. 2DE image quality was systematically assessed and studies reported by an accredited examiner. Intermodality agreement was assessed by the Bland–Altman method. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for heart failure. Patients were followed up for a median of 40.9 months (IQR 28.1–56). RESULTS: After non-anterior STEMI, LVEF measurements by 2DE (single and biplane) were consistently underestimated in comparison to CMR (CMR 55.7 ± 9.5% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.06), 2DE-2CV 52 ± 8% (p < 0.001), 2DE-biplane 53.5 ± 7.1% (p = 0.01)). After anterior STEMI, there was no significant difference in LVEF measurements by 2DE and CMR with acceptable limits of agreement (CMR 49 ± 11% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.8), 2DE-2CV 49 ± 9.2% (p = 0.9), 2DE-biplane 49.6 ± 8% (p = 0.5)). In total, 15% of patients experienced a MACE during follow-up. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, reduced LVEF (< 52%) as assessed by either 2DE or CMR was predictive of MACE (2DE HR = 2.57 (95% CI 1.1–6.2), p = 0.036; CMR HR = 2.51 (95% CI 1.1–5.7), p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: At baseline after non-anterior STEMI, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF in comparison to CMR, whereas after anterior infarction, measurements were within acceptable limits of agreement. Both imaging modalities offered similar prognostic values when a reduced LVEF < 52% was applied. KEY POINTS: • After non-anterior STEMI, 2D-echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF compared with cardiac MRI • An ejection fraction of < 52% in the acute post-infarct period by both 2D echocardiography and CMR offered similar prognostic values Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6890622/ /pubmed/31428825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06316-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Cardiac
Schwaiger, Johannes P.
Reinstadler, Sebastian J.
Tiller, Christina
Holzknecht, Magdalena
Reindl, Martin
Mayr, Agnes
Graziadei, Ivo
Müller, Silvana
Metzler, Bernhard
Klug, Gert
Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title_full Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title_fullStr Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title_full_unstemmed Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title_short Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
title_sort baseline lv ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2d echocardiography after st-elevation myocardial infarction – influence of infarct location and prognostic impact
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06316-3
work_keys_str_mv AT schwaigerjohannesp baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT reinstadlersebastianj baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT tillerchristina baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT holzknechtmagdalena baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT reindlmartin baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT mayragnes baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT graziadeiivo baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT mullersilvana baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT metzlerbernhard baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact
AT kluggert baselinelvejectionfractionbycardiacmagneticresonanceand2dechocardiographyafterstelevationmyocardialinfarctioninfluenceofinfarctlocationandprognosticimpact