Cargando…
Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x |
_version_ | 1783475647099699200 |
---|---|
author | Kox, Laura S. Jens, Sjoerd Lauf, Kenny Smithuis, Frank F. van Rijn, Rick R. Maas, Mario |
author_facet | Kox, Laura S. Jens, Sjoerd Lauf, Kenny Smithuis, Frank F. van Rijn, Rick R. Maas, Mario |
author_sort | Kox, Laura S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two raters measured ulnar variance on hand radiographs of 350 healthy children. Participants’ mean calendar and skeletal ages were 12.3 ± 3.6 and 12.0 ± 3.7 years, 52% were female. Raters used the perpendicular method, an adapted version of the perpendicular method (in which the distal radial articular surface is defined as a sclerotic rim) and the Hafner method, being the distance between the most proximal points of the ulnar and radial metaphyses (PRPR) and the distance between the most distal points of both (DIDI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intermethod consistency and inter- and intrarater agreement were calculated using a two-way ANOVA model. Variability and limits of agreement were determined using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The interrater ICC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.84) for the adapted perpendicular method, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for PRPR, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.97) for DIDI. The intermethod consistency ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48–0.70) for perpendicular versus PRPR and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49–0.70) for perpendicular versus DIDI. The intrarater ICC was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70–0.95) for perpendicular, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for PRPR, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69–0.89) for DIDI. The perpendicular method was not useable in 38 cases (skeletal age ≤ 9 years) and the Hafner method in 79 cases (skeletal age ≥ 12 years). CONCLUSIONS: The perpendicular and Hafner methods show moderate intermethod consistency. The Hafner method is preferred for children with skeletal ages < 14 years, with good to excellent inter- and intrarater agreement. The adapted perpendicular method is recommended for patients with skeletal ages ≥ 14 years. KEY POINTS: • The perpendicular method for measuring ulnar variance requires extended instructions to ensure good interrater agreement in pediatric and adolescent patients. • The Hafner method is recommended for ulnar variance measurement in children with unfused growth plates and up to a skeletal age of 13 years, and the perpendicular method is recommended for children with fused growth plates and from skeletal age 14 and older. • The mean ulnar variance measured in this study for each skeletal age group (range, 5–18 years) is provided, to serve as a reference for future ulnar variance measurements using both methods in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6890628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68906282019-12-19 Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents Kox, Laura S. Jens, Sjoerd Lauf, Kenny Smithuis, Frank F. van Rijn, Rick R. Maas, Mario Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two raters measured ulnar variance on hand radiographs of 350 healthy children. Participants’ mean calendar and skeletal ages were 12.3 ± 3.6 and 12.0 ± 3.7 years, 52% were female. Raters used the perpendicular method, an adapted version of the perpendicular method (in which the distal radial articular surface is defined as a sclerotic rim) and the Hafner method, being the distance between the most proximal points of the ulnar and radial metaphyses (PRPR) and the distance between the most distal points of both (DIDI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intermethod consistency and inter- and intrarater agreement were calculated using a two-way ANOVA model. Variability and limits of agreement were determined using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The interrater ICC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.84) for the adapted perpendicular method, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for PRPR, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.97) for DIDI. The intermethod consistency ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48–0.70) for perpendicular versus PRPR and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49–0.70) for perpendicular versus DIDI. The intrarater ICC was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70–0.95) for perpendicular, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for PRPR, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69–0.89) for DIDI. The perpendicular method was not useable in 38 cases (skeletal age ≤ 9 years) and the Hafner method in 79 cases (skeletal age ≥ 12 years). CONCLUSIONS: The perpendicular and Hafner methods show moderate intermethod consistency. The Hafner method is preferred for children with skeletal ages < 14 years, with good to excellent inter- and intrarater agreement. The adapted perpendicular method is recommended for patients with skeletal ages ≥ 14 years. KEY POINTS: • The perpendicular method for measuring ulnar variance requires extended instructions to ensure good interrater agreement in pediatric and adolescent patients. • The Hafner method is recommended for ulnar variance measurement in children with unfused growth plates and up to a skeletal age of 13 years, and the perpendicular method is recommended for children with fused growth plates and from skeletal age 14 and older. • The mean ulnar variance measured in this study for each skeletal age group (range, 5–18 years) is provided, to serve as a reference for future ulnar variance measurements using both methods in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6890628/ /pubmed/31392482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Kox, Laura S. Jens, Sjoerd Lauf, Kenny Smithuis, Frank F. van Rijn, Rick R. Maas, Mario Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title | Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title_full | Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title_fullStr | Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed | Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title_short | Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
title_sort | well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents |
topic | Musculoskeletal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koxlauras wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents AT jenssjoerd wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents AT laufkenny wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents AT smithuisfrankf wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents AT vanrijnrickr wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents AT maasmario wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents |