Cargando…

Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents

OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kox, Laura S., Jens, Sjoerd, Lauf, Kenny, Smithuis, Frank F., van Rijn, Rick R., Maas, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x
_version_ 1783475647099699200
author Kox, Laura S.
Jens, Sjoerd
Lauf, Kenny
Smithuis, Frank F.
van Rijn, Rick R.
Maas, Mario
author_facet Kox, Laura S.
Jens, Sjoerd
Lauf, Kenny
Smithuis, Frank F.
van Rijn, Rick R.
Maas, Mario
author_sort Kox, Laura S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two raters measured ulnar variance on hand radiographs of 350 healthy children. Participants’ mean calendar and skeletal ages were 12.3 ± 3.6 and 12.0 ± 3.7 years, 52% were female. Raters used the perpendicular method, an adapted version of the perpendicular method (in which the distal radial articular surface is defined as a sclerotic rim) and the Hafner method, being the distance between the most proximal points of the ulnar and radial metaphyses (PRPR) and the distance between the most distal points of both (DIDI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intermethod consistency and inter- and intrarater agreement were calculated using a two-way ANOVA model. Variability and limits of agreement were determined using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The interrater ICC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.84) for the adapted perpendicular method, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for PRPR, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.97) for DIDI. The intermethod consistency ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48–0.70) for perpendicular versus PRPR and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49–0.70) for perpendicular versus DIDI. The intrarater ICC was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70–0.95) for perpendicular, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for PRPR, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69–0.89) for DIDI. The perpendicular method was not useable in 38 cases (skeletal age ≤ 9 years) and the Hafner method in 79 cases (skeletal age ≥ 12 years). CONCLUSIONS: The perpendicular and Hafner methods show moderate intermethod consistency. The Hafner method is preferred for children with skeletal ages < 14 years, with good to excellent inter- and intrarater agreement. The adapted perpendicular method is recommended for patients with skeletal ages ≥ 14 years. KEY POINTS: • The perpendicular method for measuring ulnar variance requires extended instructions to ensure good interrater agreement in pediatric and adolescent patients. • The Hafner method is recommended for ulnar variance measurement in children with unfused growth plates and up to a skeletal age of 13 years, and the perpendicular method is recommended for children with fused growth plates and from skeletal age 14 and older. • The mean ulnar variance measured in this study for each skeletal age group (range, 5–18 years) is provided, to serve as a reference for future ulnar variance measurements using both methods in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68906282019-12-19 Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents Kox, Laura S. Jens, Sjoerd Lauf, Kenny Smithuis, Frank F. van Rijn, Rick R. Maas, Mario Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: Ulnar variance is a clinical measure used to determine the relative difference in length between the radius and ulna. We aimed to examine consistency in ulnar variance measurements and normative data in children and adolescents using the perpendicular and the Hafner methods. METHODS: Two raters measured ulnar variance on hand radiographs of 350 healthy children. Participants’ mean calendar and skeletal ages were 12.3 ± 3.6 and 12.0 ± 3.7 years, 52% were female. Raters used the perpendicular method, an adapted version of the perpendicular method (in which the distal radial articular surface is defined as a sclerotic rim) and the Hafner method, being the distance between the most proximal points of the ulnar and radial metaphyses (PRPR) and the distance between the most distal points of both (DIDI). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intermethod consistency and inter- and intrarater agreement were calculated using a two-way ANOVA model. Variability and limits of agreement were determined using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The interrater ICC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61–0.84) for the adapted perpendicular method, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for PRPR, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90–0.97) for DIDI. The intermethod consistency ICC was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48–0.70) for perpendicular versus PRPR and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49–0.70) for perpendicular versus DIDI. The intrarater ICC was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70–0.95) for perpendicular, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for PRPR, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69–0.89) for DIDI. The perpendicular method was not useable in 38 cases (skeletal age ≤ 9 years) and the Hafner method in 79 cases (skeletal age ≥ 12 years). CONCLUSIONS: The perpendicular and Hafner methods show moderate intermethod consistency. The Hafner method is preferred for children with skeletal ages < 14 years, with good to excellent inter- and intrarater agreement. The adapted perpendicular method is recommended for patients with skeletal ages ≥ 14 years. KEY POINTS: • The perpendicular method for measuring ulnar variance requires extended instructions to ensure good interrater agreement in pediatric and adolescent patients. • The Hafner method is recommended for ulnar variance measurement in children with unfused growth plates and up to a skeletal age of 13 years, and the perpendicular method is recommended for children with fused growth plates and from skeletal age 14 and older. • The mean ulnar variance measured in this study for each skeletal age group (range, 5–18 years) is provided, to serve as a reference for future ulnar variance measurements using both methods in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6890628/ /pubmed/31392482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Kox, Laura S.
Jens, Sjoerd
Lauf, Kenny
Smithuis, Frank F.
van Rijn, Rick R.
Maas, Mario
Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title_full Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title_fullStr Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title_short Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
title_sort well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06354-x
work_keys_str_mv AT koxlauras wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents
AT jenssjoerd wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents
AT laufkenny wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents
AT smithuisfrankf wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents
AT vanrijnrickr wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents
AT maasmario wellfoundedpracticeorpersonalpreferenceacomparisonofestablishedtechniquesformeasuringulnarvarianceinhealthychildrenandadolescents