Cargando…

Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons

Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birot, Sophie, Crépet, Amélie, Remington, Benjamin C., Madsen, Charlotte B., Kruizinga, Astrid G., Baumert, Joseph L., Brockhoff, Per B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1
_version_ 1783475659797954560
author Birot, Sophie
Crépet, Amélie
Remington, Benjamin C.
Madsen, Charlotte B.
Kruizinga, Astrid G.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Brockhoff, Per B.
author_facet Birot, Sophie
Crépet, Amélie
Remington, Benjamin C.
Madsen, Charlotte B.
Kruizinga, Astrid G.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Brockhoff, Per B.
author_sort Birot, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68906792019-12-10 Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons Birot, Sophie Crépet, Amélie Remington, Benjamin C. Madsen, Charlotte B. Kruizinga, Astrid G. Baumert, Joseph L. Brockhoff, Per B. Sci Rep Article Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6890679/ /pubmed/31796875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Birot, Sophie
Crépet, Amélie
Remington, Benjamin C.
Madsen, Charlotte B.
Kruizinga, Astrid G.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Brockhoff, Per B.
Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title_full Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title_fullStr Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title_short Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
title_sort frequentist and bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1
work_keys_str_mv AT birotsophie frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT crepetamelie frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT remingtonbenjaminc frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT madsencharlotteb frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT kruizingaastridg frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT baumertjosephl frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons
AT brockhoffperb frequentistandbayesianapproachesforfoodallergenriskassessmentriskoutcomeanduncertaintycomparisons