Cargando…

Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?

There is a growing shortage of kidney donors leading to extended transplant waiting times associated with increased mortality. To expand the donor pool, clinicians nowadays regularly accept organs from elderly donors, including those aged ≥70 years. There is only limited and conflicting data whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echterdiek, Fabian, Schwenger, Vedat, Döhler, Bernd, Latus, Joerg, Kitterer, Daniel, Heemann, Uwe, Süsal, Caner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02701
_version_ 1783475698210439168
author Echterdiek, Fabian
Schwenger, Vedat
Döhler, Bernd
Latus, Joerg
Kitterer, Daniel
Heemann, Uwe
Süsal, Caner
author_facet Echterdiek, Fabian
Schwenger, Vedat
Döhler, Bernd
Latus, Joerg
Kitterer, Daniel
Heemann, Uwe
Süsal, Caner
author_sort Echterdiek, Fabian
collection PubMed
description There is a growing shortage of kidney donors leading to extended transplant waiting times associated with increased mortality. To expand the donor pool, clinicians nowadays regularly accept organs from elderly donors, including those aged ≥70 years. There is only limited and conflicting data whether kidneys from these elderly donors allow for satisfactory allograft outcome rates. To asses this question, the 5-year death censored graft survival of 116,870 adult first deceased donor kidney allograft recipients that were transplanted at European centers between 1997 and 2016 and reported to the “Collaborative Transplant Study” were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and country stratified Cox regression. The combinations of the two transplant periods 1997–2006 and 2007–2016 with the donor age categories 18–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years were considered. From 1997–2006 to 2007–2016, the median donor age increased from 50 to 55 years and the proportion of kidneys from ≥60-year-old donors rose from 24.1 to 38.8%. At the same time, the proportion of kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors more than doubled (6.7 vs. 15.4%). Between 1997–2006 and 2007–2016, the 5-year graft survival improved in all donor age categories. During 2007–2016, the 5-year death censored graft survival of kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors was comparable to that of kidneys from 60 to 69-year-old donors during 1997–2006. This was true both for younger recipients (18–64 years) and older recipients (≥65 years). Among the younger recipients, 45–64-year-old recipients showed the best death censored graft survival rates for kidneys from old donors. In the country-stratified Cox regression analysis, compared to the reference of grafts from 18 to 49-year-old donors, the hazard ratio for grafts from ≥70-year-old donors during 2007–2016 was 1.92, exactly the same as the hazard ratio for grafts from 60 to 69-year-old donors during 1997–2006. Our analysis indicates that within only one further decade (1997–2006 vs. 2007–2016) the 5-year death censored graft survival of kidneys from ≥70-year old donors improved to the level of kidneys from 60 to 69-year-old donors in the previous decade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68908342019-12-11 Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60? Echterdiek, Fabian Schwenger, Vedat Döhler, Bernd Latus, Joerg Kitterer, Daniel Heemann, Uwe Süsal, Caner Front Immunol Immunology There is a growing shortage of kidney donors leading to extended transplant waiting times associated with increased mortality. To expand the donor pool, clinicians nowadays regularly accept organs from elderly donors, including those aged ≥70 years. There is only limited and conflicting data whether kidneys from these elderly donors allow for satisfactory allograft outcome rates. To asses this question, the 5-year death censored graft survival of 116,870 adult first deceased donor kidney allograft recipients that were transplanted at European centers between 1997 and 2016 and reported to the “Collaborative Transplant Study” were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and country stratified Cox regression. The combinations of the two transplant periods 1997–2006 and 2007–2016 with the donor age categories 18–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years were considered. From 1997–2006 to 2007–2016, the median donor age increased from 50 to 55 years and the proportion of kidneys from ≥60-year-old donors rose from 24.1 to 38.8%. At the same time, the proportion of kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors more than doubled (6.7 vs. 15.4%). Between 1997–2006 and 2007–2016, the 5-year graft survival improved in all donor age categories. During 2007–2016, the 5-year death censored graft survival of kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors was comparable to that of kidneys from 60 to 69-year-old donors during 1997–2006. This was true both for younger recipients (18–64 years) and older recipients (≥65 years). Among the younger recipients, 45–64-year-old recipients showed the best death censored graft survival rates for kidneys from old donors. In the country-stratified Cox regression analysis, compared to the reference of grafts from 18 to 49-year-old donors, the hazard ratio for grafts from ≥70-year-old donors during 2007–2016 was 1.92, exactly the same as the hazard ratio for grafts from 60 to 69-year-old donors during 1997–2006. Our analysis indicates that within only one further decade (1997–2006 vs. 2007–2016) the 5-year death censored graft survival of kidneys from ≥70-year old donors improved to the level of kidneys from 60 to 69-year-old donors in the previous decade. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6890834/ /pubmed/31827468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02701 Text en Copyright © 2019 Echterdiek, Schwenger, Döhler, Latus, Kitterer, Heemann and Süsal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Echterdiek, Fabian
Schwenger, Vedat
Döhler, Bernd
Latus, Joerg
Kitterer, Daniel
Heemann, Uwe
Süsal, Caner
Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title_full Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title_fullStr Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title_full_unstemmed Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title_short Kidneys From Elderly Deceased Donors—Is 70 the New 60?
title_sort kidneys from elderly deceased donors—is 70 the new 60?
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02701
work_keys_str_mv AT echterdiekfabian kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT schwengervedat kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT dohlerbernd kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT latusjoerg kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT kittererdaniel kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT heemannuwe kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60
AT susalcaner kidneysfromelderlydeceaseddonorsis70thenew60