Cargando…

Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

This study is to compare the survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 to IIB L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wenhui, Li, Lei, Wu, Ming, Ma, Shuiqing, Tan, Xianjie, Zhong, Sen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01331
_version_ 1783475706470072320
author Wang, Wenhui
Li, Lei
Wu, Ming
Ma, Shuiqing
Tan, Xianjie
Zhong, Sen
author_facet Wang, Wenhui
Li, Lei
Wu, Ming
Ma, Shuiqing
Tan, Xianjie
Zhong, Sen
author_sort Wang, Wenhui
collection PubMed
description This study is to compare the survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 to IIB LACC who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2001 and 2015 were identified. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the surgical approach and were adjusted based on clinicopathologic characteristics. A total of 396 patients were included in the study, with 179 (45.2%) and 217 (54.8%) patients in the ARH and LRH groups, respectively. The LRH group showed a significantly lower amount of estimated blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate and shorter length of hospital stay. Overall, there were no significant differences in the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS between the LRH and ARH groups with the Kaplan-Meier method. However, multivariate analyses identified LRH as an independent prognostic factor for a poor DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.19 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The analysis of stage IB2 disease and the squamous subtype (61.9% and 87.9% of all participants, respectively) reached the same conclusion. When stratifying by FIGO stage, the patients with IB2 (n = 348) in the ARH group had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05–0.42, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = 0.11) than those in the LRH group in the Cox regression model. However, no differences were found in patient with stage IIA1, IIA2, or IIB in Cox regression model. When stratifying by histological types, for the patients with squamous carcinomas (n = 375), in Cox model, ARH had a significantly superior DFS compared with those who underwent LRH (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.82, p = 0.01), but the OS was not statistically significant (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.27–1.20, p = 0.14). However, no differences were found in patient with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas in the Cox model. Therefore, ARH was associated with a higher DFS than LRH in patients with LACC, especially in patients with stage IB2 disease or the squamous subtype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68908712019-12-11 Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Wang, Wenhui Li, Lei Wu, Ming Ma, Shuiqing Tan, Xianjie Zhong, Sen Front Oncol Oncology This study is to compare the survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2 to IIB LACC who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2001 and 2015 were identified. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the surgical approach and were adjusted based on clinicopathologic characteristics. A total of 396 patients were included in the study, with 179 (45.2%) and 217 (54.8%) patients in the ARH and LRH groups, respectively. The LRH group showed a significantly lower amount of estimated blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate and shorter length of hospital stay. Overall, there were no significant differences in the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS between the LRH and ARH groups with the Kaplan-Meier method. However, multivariate analyses identified LRH as an independent prognostic factor for a poor DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.19 to 0.87; p = 0.02). The analysis of stage IB2 disease and the squamous subtype (61.9% and 87.9% of all participants, respectively) reached the same conclusion. When stratifying by FIGO stage, the patients with IB2 (n = 348) in the ARH group had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05–0.42, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = 0.11) than those in the LRH group in the Cox regression model. However, no differences were found in patient with stage IIA1, IIA2, or IIB in Cox regression model. When stratifying by histological types, for the patients with squamous carcinomas (n = 375), in Cox model, ARH had a significantly superior DFS compared with those who underwent LRH (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.82, p = 0.01), but the OS was not statistically significant (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.27–1.20, p = 0.14). However, no differences were found in patient with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas in the Cox model. Therefore, ARH was associated with a higher DFS than LRH in patients with LACC, especially in patients with stage IB2 disease or the squamous subtype. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6890871/ /pubmed/31828044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01331 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wang, Li, Wu, Ma, Tan and Zhong. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Wenhui
Li, Lei
Wu, Ming
Ma, Shuiqing
Tan, Xianjie
Zhong, Sen
Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title_full Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title_short Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
title_sort laparoscopic vs. abdominal radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01331
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwenhui laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT lilei laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT wuming laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT mashuiqing laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT tanxianjie laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT zhongsen laparoscopicvsabdominalradicalhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer