Cargando…

Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions

Due to low counts in an (111)In single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan, a large part of the head was missing in the reconstructed images on Philips Extended Brilliance Workspace (EBW) and IntelliSpace Portal (ISP) workstations. This problem occurred for the ordered subsets expectati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Nijs, Robin, Jensen, Björn Neumann, Mortensen, Jann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-10
_version_ 1783475714941517824
author de Nijs, Robin
Jensen, Björn Neumann
Mortensen, Jann
author_facet de Nijs, Robin
Jensen, Björn Neumann
Mortensen, Jann
author_sort de Nijs, Robin
collection PubMed
description Due to low counts in an (111)In single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan, a large part of the head was missing in the reconstructed images on Philips Extended Brilliance Workspace (EBW) and IntelliSpace Portal (ISP) workstations. This problem occurred for the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with and without resolution recovery (Astonish), but not for filtered backprojection (FBP) or maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM). There were also underflow problems because the images are stored as integers resulting in a loss of intensity resolution and color banding. Philips EBW2.0 and ISP5.02 workstations upscale low-count images, but the result is not always optimal, for example, in the case of low counts in one part and more counts in another part of an image. On these workstations, the missing head artefact problem could be resolved by applying a Hann pre-filter (with a cutoff at the Nyquist frequency, which only influences the filtering) in the reconstruction process. Upscaling of the projection data prior to reconstruction did not recover the head in the images, neither did limiting the reconstructed volume to the low-count part of interest. Underflow problems were partially solved by the new version 2.0 of the Philips EBW and ISP stations, although situations could arise where underflow still poses a problem. A solution for the underflow problems is to upscale the raw projection data before reconstruction. While this results in a pure upscaling of the FBP reconstruction, the effect in iterative statistical reconstruction is not only upscaling of the intensities because the assumption of Poisson statistics of the data is violated. However, the influence of this last matter seems limited. Reconstruction of studies with low counts in relevant areas should be performed with care. Reconstruction artefacts and scaling issues can easily arise. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2197-7364-1-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6890917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68909172019-12-17 Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions de Nijs, Robin Jensen, Björn Neumann Mortensen, Jann EJNMMI Phys Artefact Report Due to low counts in an (111)In single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan, a large part of the head was missing in the reconstructed images on Philips Extended Brilliance Workspace (EBW) and IntelliSpace Portal (ISP) workstations. This problem occurred for the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with and without resolution recovery (Astonish), but not for filtered backprojection (FBP) or maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM). There were also underflow problems because the images are stored as integers resulting in a loss of intensity resolution and color banding. Philips EBW2.0 and ISP5.02 workstations upscale low-count images, but the result is not always optimal, for example, in the case of low counts in one part and more counts in another part of an image. On these workstations, the missing head artefact problem could be resolved by applying a Hann pre-filter (with a cutoff at the Nyquist frequency, which only influences the filtering) in the reconstruction process. Upscaling of the projection data prior to reconstruction did not recover the head in the images, neither did limiting the reconstructed volume to the low-count part of interest. Underflow problems were partially solved by the new version 2.0 of the Philips EBW and ISP stations, although situations could arise where underflow still poses a problem. A solution for the underflow problems is to upscale the raw projection data before reconstruction. While this results in a pure upscaling of the FBP reconstruction, the effect in iterative statistical reconstruction is not only upscaling of the intensities because the assumption of Poisson statistics of the data is violated. However, the influence of this last matter seems limited. Reconstruction of studies with low counts in relevant areas should be performed with care. Reconstruction artefacts and scaling issues can easily arise. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2197-7364-1-10) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6890917/ /pubmed/26501452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-10 Text en © de Nijs et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Artefact Report
de Nijs, Robin
Jensen, Björn Neumann
Mortensen, Jann
Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title_full Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title_fullStr Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title_short Missing head and color banding in low-count SPECT reconstructions
title_sort missing head and color banding in low-count spect reconstructions
topic Artefact Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-10
work_keys_str_mv AT denijsrobin missingheadandcolorbandinginlowcountspectreconstructions
AT jensenbjornneumann missingheadandcolorbandinginlowcountspectreconstructions
AT mortensenjann missingheadandcolorbandinginlowcountspectreconstructions