Cargando…
Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: After achieving a clinical complete response through neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a nonoperative management approach for rectal cancer patients known as Wait and Watch (W&W) has gained increasing attention. However, the W&W strategy has been related to higher local recurrence a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819892477 |
_version_ | 1783475738094075904 |
---|---|
author | Pang, Kai Rao, Quan Qin, Shengqi Jin, Lan Yao, Hongwei Zhang, Zhongtao |
author_facet | Pang, Kai Rao, Quan Qin, Shengqi Jin, Lan Yao, Hongwei Zhang, Zhongtao |
author_sort | Pang, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: After achieving a clinical complete response through neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a nonoperative management approach for rectal cancer patients known as Wait and Watch (W&W) has gained increasing attention. However, the W&W strategy has been related to higher local recurrence and ambiguous long-term survival. This meta-analysis compared key prognosis indicators between W&W and surgical treatment in an effort to clarify some long-standing points of confusion. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, EMbase, Cochrane Library were searched for relevant researches comparing W&W with surgery treatment, with a time criteria set from 1 January 2002 to 4 July 2019. Endpoints were 2-year local regrowth/recurrence, 2-year distant metastasis (plus local regrowth/recurrence), 3- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, nine studies with 801 patients were enrolled, of which 348 were managed by W&W and 453 by surgery. Surgery patients were further divided into a pathological complete response (pCR) group (all included patients achieved pCR) and a surgery group (consisting of both pCR and non-pCR patients without deliberate screening). Compared with the surgery group, W&W patients have higher 3- and 5-year OS, and are not inferior on 2-year local regrowth (LR), 2-year distant metastasis (DM)/DM+LR, and 3- and 5-year DFS. On the other hand, compared with the pCR group, the W&W group is inferior on 2-year LR, 3- and 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS, and not inferior on 2-year DM/DM+LR and 3-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with patients undergoing surgical treatment, the W&W group has higher 3- and 5-year OS, and is not inferior on other major prognostic indicators, which, however, is based on the fact that the tumor stage in the W&W group is generally earlier. Versus surgically treated patients who acquired pCR, W&W group is inferior on all major prognostic indicators except 2-year DM/DM+LR and 3-year OS. Additionally, by comparison of cCR definitions across different studies, we conclude that implementation of the strictest cCR criteria is critical for W&W patients to acquire maximum prognostic benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6891008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68910082019-12-12 Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis Pang, Kai Rao, Quan Qin, Shengqi Jin, Lan Yao, Hongwei Zhang, Zhongtao Therap Adv Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: After achieving a clinical complete response through neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a nonoperative management approach for rectal cancer patients known as Wait and Watch (W&W) has gained increasing attention. However, the W&W strategy has been related to higher local recurrence and ambiguous long-term survival. This meta-analysis compared key prognosis indicators between W&W and surgical treatment in an effort to clarify some long-standing points of confusion. METHODS: Pubmed, Web of Science, EMbase, Cochrane Library were searched for relevant researches comparing W&W with surgery treatment, with a time criteria set from 1 January 2002 to 4 July 2019. Endpoints were 2-year local regrowth/recurrence, 2-year distant metastasis (plus local regrowth/recurrence), 3- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, nine studies with 801 patients were enrolled, of which 348 were managed by W&W and 453 by surgery. Surgery patients were further divided into a pathological complete response (pCR) group (all included patients achieved pCR) and a surgery group (consisting of both pCR and non-pCR patients without deliberate screening). Compared with the surgery group, W&W patients have higher 3- and 5-year OS, and are not inferior on 2-year local regrowth (LR), 2-year distant metastasis (DM)/DM+LR, and 3- and 5-year DFS. On the other hand, compared with the pCR group, the W&W group is inferior on 2-year LR, 3- and 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS, and not inferior on 2-year DM/DM+LR and 3-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with patients undergoing surgical treatment, the W&W group has higher 3- and 5-year OS, and is not inferior on other major prognostic indicators, which, however, is based on the fact that the tumor stage in the W&W group is generally earlier. Versus surgically treated patients who acquired pCR, W&W group is inferior on all major prognostic indicators except 2-year DM/DM+LR and 3-year OS. Additionally, by comparison of cCR definitions across different studies, we conclude that implementation of the strictest cCR criteria is critical for W&W patients to acquire maximum prognostic benefit. SAGE Publications 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6891008/ /pubmed/31832099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819892477 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Pang, Kai Rao, Quan Qin, Shengqi Jin, Lan Yao, Hongwei Zhang, Zhongtao Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis |
title | Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognosis comparison between wait and watch and surgical strategy on
rectal cancer patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a
meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284819892477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pangkai prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis AT raoquan prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis AT qinshengqi prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis AT jinlan prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis AT yaohongwei prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis AT zhangzhongtao prognosiscomparisonbetweenwaitandwatchandsurgicalstrategyonrectalcancerpatientsaftertreatmentwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyametaanalysis |