Cargando…
A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893 |
_version_ | 1783475843576627200 |
---|---|
author | Shahabi, Hejar Jarihani, Ben Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh Chittleborough, David Avand, Mohammadtaghi Ghorbanzadeh, Omid |
author_facet | Shahabi, Hejar Jarihani, Ben Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh Chittleborough, David Avand, Mohammadtaghi Ghorbanzadeh, Omid |
author_sort | Shahabi, Hejar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automated object-based gully networks detection process using a combination of multi-source and multi-scale remote sensing and ground-based data. An advanced approach was employed by integrating geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) with current machine learning (ML) models. These included artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF), and an ensemble ML model of stacking to deal with the spatial scaling problem in gully networks detection. Spectral indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and topographic conditioning factors, such as elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (SL), and curvature, were generated from Sentinel 2A images and the ALOS 12-m digital elevation model (DEM), respectively. For image segmentation, the ESP2 tool was used to obtain three optimal scale factors. On using object pureness index (OPI), object matching index (OMI), and object fitness index (OFI), the accuracy of each scale in image segmentation was evaluated. The scale parameter of 45 with OFI of 0.94, which is a combination of OPI and OMI indices, proved to be the optimal scale parameter for image segmentation. Furthermore, segmented objects based on scale 45 were overlaid with 70% and 30% of a prepared gully inventory map to select the ML models’ training and testing objects, respectively. The quantitative accuracy assessment methods of Precision, Recall, and an F1 measure were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Integration of GEOBIA with the stacking model using a scale of 45 resulted in the highest accuracy in detection of gully networks with an F1 measure value of 0.89. Here, we conclude that the adoption of optimal scale object definition in the GEOBIA and application of the ensemble stacking of ML models resulted in higher accuracy in the detection of gully networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6891561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68915612019-12-18 A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia Shahabi, Hejar Jarihani, Ben Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh Chittleborough, David Avand, Mohammadtaghi Ghorbanzadeh, Omid Sensors (Basel) Article Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automated object-based gully networks detection process using a combination of multi-source and multi-scale remote sensing and ground-based data. An advanced approach was employed by integrating geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) with current machine learning (ML) models. These included artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF), and an ensemble ML model of stacking to deal with the spatial scaling problem in gully networks detection. Spectral indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and topographic conditioning factors, such as elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (SL), and curvature, were generated from Sentinel 2A images and the ALOS 12-m digital elevation model (DEM), respectively. For image segmentation, the ESP2 tool was used to obtain three optimal scale factors. On using object pureness index (OPI), object matching index (OMI), and object fitness index (OFI), the accuracy of each scale in image segmentation was evaluated. The scale parameter of 45 with OFI of 0.94, which is a combination of OPI and OMI indices, proved to be the optimal scale parameter for image segmentation. Furthermore, segmented objects based on scale 45 were overlaid with 70% and 30% of a prepared gully inventory map to select the ML models’ training and testing objects, respectively. The quantitative accuracy assessment methods of Precision, Recall, and an F1 measure were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Integration of GEOBIA with the stacking model using a scale of 45 resulted in the highest accuracy in detection of gully networks with an F1 measure value of 0.89. Here, we conclude that the adoption of optimal scale object definition in the GEOBIA and application of the ensemble stacking of ML models resulted in higher accuracy in the detection of gully networks. MDPI 2019-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6891561/ /pubmed/31717546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shahabi, Hejar Jarihani, Ben Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh Chittleborough, David Avand, Mohammadtaghi Ghorbanzadeh, Omid A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title | A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title_full | A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title_fullStr | A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title_short | A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia |
title_sort | semi-automated object-based gully networks detection using different machine learning models: a case study of bowen catchment, queensland, australia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahabihejar asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT jarihaniben asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT tavakkolipiralilousepideh asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT chittleboroughdavid asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT avandmohammadtaghi asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT ghorbanzadehomid asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT shahabihejar semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT jarihaniben semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT tavakkolipiralilousepideh semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT chittleboroughdavid semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT avandmohammadtaghi semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia AT ghorbanzadehomid semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia |