Cargando…

A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia

Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahabi, Hejar, Jarihani, Ben, Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh, Chittleborough, David, Avand, Mohammadtaghi, Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893
_version_ 1783475843576627200
author Shahabi, Hejar
Jarihani, Ben
Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh
Chittleborough, David
Avand, Mohammadtaghi
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
author_facet Shahabi, Hejar
Jarihani, Ben
Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh
Chittleborough, David
Avand, Mohammadtaghi
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
author_sort Shahabi, Hejar
collection PubMed
description Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automated object-based gully networks detection process using a combination of multi-source and multi-scale remote sensing and ground-based data. An advanced approach was employed by integrating geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) with current machine learning (ML) models. These included artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF), and an ensemble ML model of stacking to deal with the spatial scaling problem in gully networks detection. Spectral indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and topographic conditioning factors, such as elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (SL), and curvature, were generated from Sentinel 2A images and the ALOS 12-m digital elevation model (DEM), respectively. For image segmentation, the ESP2 tool was used to obtain three optimal scale factors. On using object pureness index (OPI), object matching index (OMI), and object fitness index (OFI), the accuracy of each scale in image segmentation was evaluated. The scale parameter of 45 with OFI of 0.94, which is a combination of OPI and OMI indices, proved to be the optimal scale parameter for image segmentation. Furthermore, segmented objects based on scale 45 were overlaid with 70% and 30% of a prepared gully inventory map to select the ML models’ training and testing objects, respectively. The quantitative accuracy assessment methods of Precision, Recall, and an F1 measure were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Integration of GEOBIA with the stacking model using a scale of 45 resulted in the highest accuracy in detection of gully networks with an F1 measure value of 0.89. Here, we conclude that the adoption of optimal scale object definition in the GEOBIA and application of the ensemble stacking of ML models resulted in higher accuracy in the detection of gully networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6891561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68915612019-12-18 A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia Shahabi, Hejar Jarihani, Ben Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh Chittleborough, David Avand, Mohammadtaghi Ghorbanzadeh, Omid Sensors (Basel) Article Gully erosion is a dominant source of sediment and particulates to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) World Heritage area. We selected the Bowen catchment, a tributary of the Burdekin Basin, as our area of study; the region is associated with a high density of gully networks. We aimed to use a semi-automated object-based gully networks detection process using a combination of multi-source and multi-scale remote sensing and ground-based data. An advanced approach was employed by integrating geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) with current machine learning (ML) models. These included artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF), and an ensemble ML model of stacking to deal with the spatial scaling problem in gully networks detection. Spectral indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and topographic conditioning factors, such as elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (SL), and curvature, were generated from Sentinel 2A images and the ALOS 12-m digital elevation model (DEM), respectively. For image segmentation, the ESP2 tool was used to obtain three optimal scale factors. On using object pureness index (OPI), object matching index (OMI), and object fitness index (OFI), the accuracy of each scale in image segmentation was evaluated. The scale parameter of 45 with OFI of 0.94, which is a combination of OPI and OMI indices, proved to be the optimal scale parameter for image segmentation. Furthermore, segmented objects based on scale 45 were overlaid with 70% and 30% of a prepared gully inventory map to select the ML models’ training and testing objects, respectively. The quantitative accuracy assessment methods of Precision, Recall, and an F1 measure were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Integration of GEOBIA with the stacking model using a scale of 45 resulted in the highest accuracy in detection of gully networks with an F1 measure value of 0.89. Here, we conclude that the adoption of optimal scale object definition in the GEOBIA and application of the ensemble stacking of ML models resulted in higher accuracy in the detection of gully networks. MDPI 2019-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6891561/ /pubmed/31717546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shahabi, Hejar
Jarihani, Ben
Tavakkoli Piralilou, Sepideh
Chittleborough, David
Avand, Mohammadtaghi
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title_full A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title_fullStr A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title_full_unstemmed A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title_short A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia
title_sort semi-automated object-based gully networks detection using different machine learning models: a case study of bowen catchment, queensland, australia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6891561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19224893
work_keys_str_mv AT shahabihejar asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT jarihaniben asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT tavakkolipiralilousepideh asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT chittleboroughdavid asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT avandmohammadtaghi asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT ghorbanzadehomid asemiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT shahabihejar semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT jarihaniben semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT tavakkolipiralilousepideh semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT chittleboroughdavid semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT avandmohammadtaghi semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia
AT ghorbanzadehomid semiautomatedobjectbasedgullynetworksdetectionusingdifferentmachinelearningmodelsacasestudyofbowencatchmentqueenslandaustralia