Cargando…

Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”

A recent article in the journal reported analyses of KDQOL-36™ survey data collected from 240,343 adults (330,412 surveys) dialyzed at a large dialysis organization in the United States during 2014–2016. The authors concluded that the KDQOL-36™ Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease scale had the h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hays, Ron D., Peipert, John D., Kallich, Joel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1609-2
_version_ 1783475988491927552
author Hays, Ron D.
Peipert, John D.
Kallich, Joel D.
author_facet Hays, Ron D.
Peipert, John D.
Kallich, Joel D.
author_sort Hays, Ron D.
collection PubMed
description A recent article in the journal reported analyses of KDQOL-36™ survey data collected from 240,343 adults (330,412 surveys) dialyzed at a large dialysis organization in the United States during 2014–2016. The authors concluded that the KDQOL-36™ Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease scale had the highest mean score of the KDQOL-36™ scales. We note that this inference was erroneous because the scales are not scored on the same numeric scale. In addition, the authors found that responses to a general health perceptions item (“In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor”) was not significantly associated with any of the 5 KDQOL-36 scale scores. In contrast, we find significant and noteworthy correlations in two other datasets. These analytic issues call into question the accuracy and validity of the conclusions of this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6892228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68922282019-12-11 Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States” Hays, Ron D. Peipert, John D. Kallich, Joel D. BMC Nephrol Correspondence A recent article in the journal reported analyses of KDQOL-36™ survey data collected from 240,343 adults (330,412 surveys) dialyzed at a large dialysis organization in the United States during 2014–2016. The authors concluded that the KDQOL-36™ Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease scale had the highest mean score of the KDQOL-36™ scales. We note that this inference was erroneous because the scales are not scored on the same numeric scale. In addition, the authors found that responses to a general health perceptions item (“In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor”) was not significantly associated with any of the 5 KDQOL-36 scale scores. In contrast, we find significant and noteworthy correlations in two other datasets. These analytic issues call into question the accuracy and validity of the conclusions of this paper. BioMed Central 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6892228/ /pubmed/31795976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1609-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Hays, Ron D.
Peipert, John D.
Kallich, Joel D.
Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title_full Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title_fullStr Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title_full_unstemmed Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title_short Problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States”
title_sort problems with analyses and interpretation of data in “use of the kdqol-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the united states”
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1609-2
work_keys_str_mv AT haysrond problemswithanalysesandinterpretationofdatainuseofthekdqol36forassessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeamongdialysispatientsintheunitedstates
AT peipertjohnd problemswithanalysesandinterpretationofdatainuseofthekdqol36forassessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeamongdialysispatientsintheunitedstates
AT kallichjoeld problemswithanalysesandinterpretationofdatainuseofthekdqol36forassessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeamongdialysispatientsintheunitedstates