Cargando…
Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative feat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Canadian Medical Education Journal
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807229 |
_version_ | 1783476006545260544 |
---|---|
author | Evensen, Ann Duffy, Sean Dawe, Russell Pike, Andrea Nelson, Brett D. |
author_facet | Evensen, Ann Duffy, Sean Dawe, Russell Pike, Andrea Nelson, Brett D. |
author_sort | Evensen, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative features, and challenges. METHODS: The authors surveyed program directors or designees from GH fellowships with a web-based tool in 2017. RESULTS: The authors identified 85 programs. Fifty-four programs (63.5%) responded confirming 50 fellowships. One- third of fellowships accepted graduates from more than one specialty, and the most common single-specialty programs were Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine. Fellowships most commonly were 24 months in duration with a median size of one fellow per year. Funding and lack of qualified applicants were significant challenges. Most programs were funded through fellow billing for patient care or other self-support. CONCLUSION: The number of U.S. and Canadian GH fellowship programs has nearly doubled since 2010. Challenges include lack of funding and qualified applicants. Further work is needed to understand how best to identify and disseminate fellowship best practices to meet the diverse needs of international partners, fellows, and the patients they serve and to determine if consensus regarding training requirements would be beneficial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6892312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Canadian Medical Education Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68923122019-12-05 Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada Evensen, Ann Duffy, Sean Dawe, Russell Pike, Andrea Nelson, Brett D. Can Med Educ J Brief Reports BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative features, and challenges. METHODS: The authors surveyed program directors or designees from GH fellowships with a web-based tool in 2017. RESULTS: The authors identified 85 programs. Fifty-four programs (63.5%) responded confirming 50 fellowships. One- third of fellowships accepted graduates from more than one specialty, and the most common single-specialty programs were Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine. Fellowships most commonly were 24 months in duration with a median size of one fellow per year. Funding and lack of qualified applicants were significant challenges. Most programs were funded through fellow billing for patient care or other self-support. CONCLUSION: The number of U.S. and Canadian GH fellowship programs has nearly doubled since 2010. Challenges include lack of funding and qualified applicants. Further work is needed to understand how best to identify and disseminate fellowship best practices to meet the diverse needs of international partners, fellows, and the patients they serve and to determine if consensus regarding training requirements would be beneficial. Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6892312/ /pubmed/31807229 Text en © 2019 Evensen, Duffy, Dawe, Pike, Nelson; licensee Synergies Partners http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Journal Systems article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Evensen, Ann Duffy, Sean Dawe, Russell Pike, Andrea Nelson, Brett D. Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title | Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title_full | Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title_fullStr | Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title_short | Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada |
title_sort | status of global health fellowship training in the united states and canada |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evensenann statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada AT duffysean statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada AT dawerussell statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada AT pikeandrea statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada AT nelsonbrettd statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada |