Cargando…

Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative feat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evensen, Ann, Duffy, Sean, Dawe, Russell, Pike, Andrea, Nelson, Brett D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807229
_version_ 1783476006545260544
author Evensen, Ann
Duffy, Sean
Dawe, Russell
Pike, Andrea
Nelson, Brett D.
author_facet Evensen, Ann
Duffy, Sean
Dawe, Russell
Pike, Andrea
Nelson, Brett D.
author_sort Evensen, Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative features, and challenges. METHODS: The authors surveyed program directors or designees from GH fellowships with a web-based tool in 2017. RESULTS: The authors identified 85 programs. Fifty-four programs (63.5%) responded confirming 50 fellowships. One- third of fellowships accepted graduates from more than one specialty, and the most common single-specialty programs were Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine. Fellowships most commonly were 24 months in duration with a median size of one fellow per year. Funding and lack of qualified applicants were significant challenges. Most programs were funded through fellow billing for patient care or other self-support. CONCLUSION: The number of U.S. and Canadian GH fellowship programs has nearly doubled since 2010. Challenges include lack of funding and qualified applicants. Further work is needed to understand how best to identify and disseminate fellowship best practices to meet the diverse needs of international partners, fellows, and the patients they serve and to determine if consensus regarding training requirements would be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6892312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68923122019-12-05 Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada Evensen, Ann Duffy, Sean Dawe, Russell Pike, Andrea Nelson, Brett D. Can Med Educ J Brief Reports BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of residency graduates desire global health (GH) fellowship training. However, the full extent of training options is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical GH fellowships in all specialties in the U.S. and Canada and to describe their demographics, innovative features, and challenges. METHODS: The authors surveyed program directors or designees from GH fellowships with a web-based tool in 2017. RESULTS: The authors identified 85 programs. Fifty-four programs (63.5%) responded confirming 50 fellowships. One- third of fellowships accepted graduates from more than one specialty, and the most common single-specialty programs were Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine. Fellowships most commonly were 24 months in duration with a median size of one fellow per year. Funding and lack of qualified applicants were significant challenges. Most programs were funded through fellow billing for patient care or other self-support. CONCLUSION: The number of U.S. and Canadian GH fellowship programs has nearly doubled since 2010. Challenges include lack of funding and qualified applicants. Further work is needed to understand how best to identify and disseminate fellowship best practices to meet the diverse needs of international partners, fellows, and the patients they serve and to determine if consensus regarding training requirements would be beneficial. Canadian Medical Education Journal 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6892312/ /pubmed/31807229 Text en © 2019 Evensen, Duffy, Dawe, Pike, Nelson; licensee Synergies Partners http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Journal Systems article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Evensen, Ann
Duffy, Sean
Dawe, Russell
Pike, Andrea
Nelson, Brett D.
Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title_full Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title_fullStr Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title_short Status of global health fellowship training in the United States and Canada
title_sort status of global health fellowship training in the united states and canada
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807229
work_keys_str_mv AT evensenann statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT duffysean statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT dawerussell statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT pikeandrea statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada
AT nelsonbrettd statusofglobalhealthfellowshiptrainingintheunitedstatesandcanada