Cargando…

Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined

Despite being widely studied, the underlying mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP), early cortical silent period (CSP) and rebound activity are not fully understood. Our aim is to better characterize these phenomena by combining various anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem, Haavik, Heidi, Nedergaard, Rasmus Wiberg, Topkara, Betilay, Şenocak, Beatrice Selen, Göztepe, Mehmet Berke, Niazi, Imran Khan, Türker, Kemal Sitki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225535
_version_ 1783476035905388544
author Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem
Haavik, Heidi
Nedergaard, Rasmus Wiberg
Topkara, Betilay
Şenocak, Beatrice Selen
Göztepe, Mehmet Berke
Niazi, Imran Khan
Türker, Kemal Sitki
author_facet Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem
Haavik, Heidi
Nedergaard, Rasmus Wiberg
Topkara, Betilay
Şenocak, Beatrice Selen
Göztepe, Mehmet Berke
Niazi, Imran Khan
Türker, Kemal Sitki
author_sort Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem
collection PubMed
description Despite being widely studied, the underlying mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP), early cortical silent period (CSP) and rebound activity are not fully understood. Our aim is to better characterize these phenomena by combining various analysis tools on firing motor units. Responses of 29 tibialis anterior (TA) and 8 abductor pollicis brevis (APB) motor units to TMS pulses were studied using discharge rate and probability-based tools to illustrate the profile of the synaptic potentials as they develop on motoneurons in 24 healthy volunteers. According to probability-based methods, TMS pulse produces a short-latency MEP which is immediately followed by CSP that terminates at rebound activity. Discharge rate analysis, however, revealed not three, but just two events with distinct time courses; a long-lasting excitatory period (71.2 ± 9.0 ms for TA and 42.1 ± 11.2 ms for APB) and a long-latency inhibitory period with duration of 57.9 ± 9.5 ms for TA and 67.3 ± 13.8 ms for APB. We propose that part of the CSP may relate to the falling phase of net excitatory postsynaptic potential induced by TMS. Rebound activity, on the other hand, may represent tendon organ inhibition induced by MEP activated soleus contraction and/or long-latency intracortical inhibition. Due to generation of field potentials when high intensity TMS is used, this study is limited to investigate the events evoked by low intensity TMS only and does not provide information about later parts of much longer CSPs induced by high intensity TMS. Adding discharge rate analysis contributes to obtain a more accurate picture about the characteristics of TMS-induced events. These results have implications for interpreting motor responses following TMS for diagnosis and overseeing recovery from various neurological conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6892484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68924842019-12-14 Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem Haavik, Heidi Nedergaard, Rasmus Wiberg Topkara, Betilay Şenocak, Beatrice Selen Göztepe, Mehmet Berke Niazi, Imran Khan Türker, Kemal Sitki PLoS One Research Article Despite being widely studied, the underlying mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP), early cortical silent period (CSP) and rebound activity are not fully understood. Our aim is to better characterize these phenomena by combining various analysis tools on firing motor units. Responses of 29 tibialis anterior (TA) and 8 abductor pollicis brevis (APB) motor units to TMS pulses were studied using discharge rate and probability-based tools to illustrate the profile of the synaptic potentials as they develop on motoneurons in 24 healthy volunteers. According to probability-based methods, TMS pulse produces a short-latency MEP which is immediately followed by CSP that terminates at rebound activity. Discharge rate analysis, however, revealed not three, but just two events with distinct time courses; a long-lasting excitatory period (71.2 ± 9.0 ms for TA and 42.1 ± 11.2 ms for APB) and a long-latency inhibitory period with duration of 57.9 ± 9.5 ms for TA and 67.3 ± 13.8 ms for APB. We propose that part of the CSP may relate to the falling phase of net excitatory postsynaptic potential induced by TMS. Rebound activity, on the other hand, may represent tendon organ inhibition induced by MEP activated soleus contraction and/or long-latency intracortical inhibition. Due to generation of field potentials when high intensity TMS is used, this study is limited to investigate the events evoked by low intensity TMS only and does not provide information about later parts of much longer CSPs induced by high intensity TMS. Adding discharge rate analysis contributes to obtain a more accurate picture about the characteristics of TMS-induced events. These results have implications for interpreting motor responses following TMS for diagnosis and overseeing recovery from various neurological conditions. Public Library of Science 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6892484/ /pubmed/31800618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225535 Text en © 2019 Özyurt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Özyurt, Mustafa Görkem
Haavik, Heidi
Nedergaard, Rasmus Wiberg
Topkara, Betilay
Şenocak, Beatrice Selen
Göztepe, Mehmet Berke
Niazi, Imran Khan
Türker, Kemal Sitki
Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title_full Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title_fullStr Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title_short Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
title_sort transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225535
work_keys_str_mv AT ozyurtmustafagorkem transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT haavikheidi transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT nedergaardrasmuswiberg transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT topkarabetilay transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT senocakbeatriceselen transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT goztepemehmetberke transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT niaziimrankhan transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined
AT turkerkemalsitki transcranialmagneticstimulationinducedearlysilentperiodandreboundactivityreexamined