Cargando…

False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study

RATIONALE: Cannabis use is widespread and has previously been associated with memory impairments. However, the role of cannabis in relation to false memory production, i.e., memories of events that were not experienced, is less well-understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current field study was to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kloft, Lilian, Otgaar, Henry, Blokland, Arjan, Garbaciak, Alicja, Monds, Lauren A., Ramaekers, Johannes G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05309-w
_version_ 1783476072677900288
author Kloft, Lilian
Otgaar, Henry
Blokland, Arjan
Garbaciak, Alicja
Monds, Lauren A.
Ramaekers, Johannes G.
author_facet Kloft, Lilian
Otgaar, Henry
Blokland, Arjan
Garbaciak, Alicja
Monds, Lauren A.
Ramaekers, Johannes G.
author_sort Kloft, Lilian
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Cannabis use is widespread and has previously been associated with memory impairments. However, the role of cannabis in relation to false memory production, i.e., memories of events that were not experienced, is less well-understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current field study was to examine the impact of cannabis use on false memory production. METHODS: The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to induce false memories. In this paradigm, participants study word lists that are associatively related to a non-presented word, termed the critical lure. In a later memory test, true recognition rates and false alarm rates toward critical lures and unrelated items are assessed. Memory performance was compared between three groups: regular cannabis consumers who were acutely intoxicated (n = 53), regular cannabis consumers who were sober (n = 50), and cannabis-naïve controls (n = 53). The participants were approached in Dutch coffee shops (cannabis outlets) and cafes and asked to participate in our study. After collecting general information on their cannabis use, they were subjected to the DRM procedure. RESULTS: Although false memory rates for critical lures did not statistically differ between groups, both intoxicated and sober cannabis consumers falsely recognized more unrelated items than control participants. Also, individuals without a history of cannabis use demonstrated higher memory accuracy compared with the intoxicated group. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that cannabis intoxication and history of cannabis use induce a liberal response criterion for newly presented words for which the level of association with previously learned words is low and uncertainty is high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6892757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68927572019-12-19 False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study Kloft, Lilian Otgaar, Henry Blokland, Arjan Garbaciak, Alicja Monds, Lauren A. Ramaekers, Johannes G. Psychopharmacology (Berl) Original Investigation RATIONALE: Cannabis use is widespread and has previously been associated with memory impairments. However, the role of cannabis in relation to false memory production, i.e., memories of events that were not experienced, is less well-understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current field study was to examine the impact of cannabis use on false memory production. METHODS: The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to induce false memories. In this paradigm, participants study word lists that are associatively related to a non-presented word, termed the critical lure. In a later memory test, true recognition rates and false alarm rates toward critical lures and unrelated items are assessed. Memory performance was compared between three groups: regular cannabis consumers who were acutely intoxicated (n = 53), regular cannabis consumers who were sober (n = 50), and cannabis-naïve controls (n = 53). The participants were approached in Dutch coffee shops (cannabis outlets) and cafes and asked to participate in our study. After collecting general information on their cannabis use, they were subjected to the DRM procedure. RESULTS: Although false memory rates for critical lures did not statistically differ between groups, both intoxicated and sober cannabis consumers falsely recognized more unrelated items than control participants. Also, individuals without a history of cannabis use demonstrated higher memory accuracy compared with the intoxicated group. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that cannabis intoxication and history of cannabis use induce a liberal response criterion for newly presented words for which the level of association with previously learned words is low and uncertainty is high. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6892757/ /pubmed/31250074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05309-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Kloft, Lilian
Otgaar, Henry
Blokland, Arjan
Garbaciak, Alicja
Monds, Lauren A.
Ramaekers, Johannes G.
False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title_full False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title_fullStr False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title_full_unstemmed False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title_short False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
title_sort false memory formation in cannabis users: a field study
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05309-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kloftlilian falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy
AT otgaarhenry falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy
AT bloklandarjan falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy
AT garbaciakalicja falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy
AT mondslaurena falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy
AT ramaekersjohannesg falsememoryformationincannabisusersafieldstudy