Cargando…

Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Pamela, Heirene, Robert M., Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev, Evans, Jonathan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636
_version_ 1783476076515688448
author Brown, Pamela
Heirene, Robert M.
Gareth-Roderique-Davies,
John, Bev
Evans, Jonathan J.
author_facet Brown, Pamela
Heirene, Robert M.
Gareth-Roderique-Davies,
John, Bev
Evans, Jonathan J.
author_sort Brown, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) for this purpose. METHODS: Comparing 28 participants with ARBD (11 with Korsakoff’s Syndrome and 17 with the umbrella “ARBD” diagnosis) and 30 alcohol-dependent participants without ARBD (ALs) we calculated Area Under the Curve (AUC) statistics, sensitivity and specificity values, base-rate adjusted predictive values, and likelihood ratios for both tests. RESULTS: High levels of screening accuracy were found for the total scores of both the ACE-III (AUC = 0.823, 95% CIs [0.714, 0.932], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤86: sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 73%) and RBANS (AUC = 0.846, 95% CIs [0.746, 0.947], SE = 0.052; optimal cut-off ≤83: sensitivity = 89%, specificity = 67%) at multiple cut-off points. Removing participants with a history of polysubstance from the samples (10 ALs and 1 ARBD) improved the diagnostic capabilities of the RBANS substantially (AUC = 0.915, 95% CIs [0.831, 0.999], SE = 0.043; optimal cut-off ≤85: sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 80%), while only minor improvements to the ACE-III’s accuracy were observed (AUC = 0.854, 95% CIs [0.744, 0.963], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤88: sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Overall, both the ACE-III and RBANS are suitable tools for ARBD screening within an alcohol-dependent population, though the RBANS is the superior of the two. Clinicians using these tools for ARBD screening should be cautious of false-positive outcomes and should therefore combine them with other assessment methods (e.g., neuroimaging, clinical observations) and more detailed neuropsychological testing before reaching diagnostic decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6892773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68927732019-12-17 Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage Brown, Pamela Heirene, Robert M. Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev Evans, Jonathan J. Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) for this purpose. METHODS: Comparing 28 participants with ARBD (11 with Korsakoff’s Syndrome and 17 with the umbrella “ARBD” diagnosis) and 30 alcohol-dependent participants without ARBD (ALs) we calculated Area Under the Curve (AUC) statistics, sensitivity and specificity values, base-rate adjusted predictive values, and likelihood ratios for both tests. RESULTS: High levels of screening accuracy were found for the total scores of both the ACE-III (AUC = 0.823, 95% CIs [0.714, 0.932], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤86: sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 73%) and RBANS (AUC = 0.846, 95% CIs [0.746, 0.947], SE = 0.052; optimal cut-off ≤83: sensitivity = 89%, specificity = 67%) at multiple cut-off points. Removing participants with a history of polysubstance from the samples (10 ALs and 1 ARBD) improved the diagnostic capabilities of the RBANS substantially (AUC = 0.915, 95% CIs [0.831, 0.999], SE = 0.043; optimal cut-off ≤85: sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 80%), while only minor improvements to the ACE-III’s accuracy were observed (AUC = 0.854, 95% CIs [0.744, 0.963], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤88: sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Overall, both the ACE-III and RBANS are suitable tools for ARBD screening within an alcohol-dependent population, though the RBANS is the superior of the two. Clinicians using these tools for ARBD screening should be cautious of false-positive outcomes and should therefore combine them with other assessment methods (e.g., neuroimaging, clinical observations) and more detailed neuropsychological testing before reaching diagnostic decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6892773/ /pubmed/31849759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636 Text en Copyright © 2019 Brown, Heirene, Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John and Evans. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Brown, Pamela
Heirene, Robert M.
Gareth-Roderique-Davies,
John, Bev
Evans, Jonathan J.
Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title_full Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title_fullStr Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title_short Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
title_sort applicability of the ace-iii and rbans cognitive tests for the detection of alcohol-related brain damage
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636
work_keys_str_mv AT brownpamela applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage
AT heirenerobertm applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage
AT garethroderiquedavies applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage
AT johnbev applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage
AT evansjonathanj applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage