Cargando…
Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636 |
_version_ | 1783476076515688448 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Pamela Heirene, Robert M. Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev Evans, Jonathan J. |
author_facet | Brown, Pamela Heirene, Robert M. Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev Evans, Jonathan J. |
author_sort | Brown, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) for this purpose. METHODS: Comparing 28 participants with ARBD (11 with Korsakoff’s Syndrome and 17 with the umbrella “ARBD” diagnosis) and 30 alcohol-dependent participants without ARBD (ALs) we calculated Area Under the Curve (AUC) statistics, sensitivity and specificity values, base-rate adjusted predictive values, and likelihood ratios for both tests. RESULTS: High levels of screening accuracy were found for the total scores of both the ACE-III (AUC = 0.823, 95% CIs [0.714, 0.932], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤86: sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 73%) and RBANS (AUC = 0.846, 95% CIs [0.746, 0.947], SE = 0.052; optimal cut-off ≤83: sensitivity = 89%, specificity = 67%) at multiple cut-off points. Removing participants with a history of polysubstance from the samples (10 ALs and 1 ARBD) improved the diagnostic capabilities of the RBANS substantially (AUC = 0.915, 95% CIs [0.831, 0.999], SE = 0.043; optimal cut-off ≤85: sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 80%), while only minor improvements to the ACE-III’s accuracy were observed (AUC = 0.854, 95% CIs [0.744, 0.963], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤88: sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Overall, both the ACE-III and RBANS are suitable tools for ARBD screening within an alcohol-dependent population, though the RBANS is the superior of the two. Clinicians using these tools for ARBD screening should be cautious of false-positive outcomes and should therefore combine them with other assessment methods (e.g., neuroimaging, clinical observations) and more detailed neuropsychological testing before reaching diagnostic decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6892773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68927732019-12-17 Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage Brown, Pamela Heirene, Robert M. Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev Evans, Jonathan J. Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent investigations have highlighted the value of neuropsychological testing for the assessment and screening of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) for this purpose. METHODS: Comparing 28 participants with ARBD (11 with Korsakoff’s Syndrome and 17 with the umbrella “ARBD” diagnosis) and 30 alcohol-dependent participants without ARBD (ALs) we calculated Area Under the Curve (AUC) statistics, sensitivity and specificity values, base-rate adjusted predictive values, and likelihood ratios for both tests. RESULTS: High levels of screening accuracy were found for the total scores of both the ACE-III (AUC = 0.823, 95% CIs [0.714, 0.932], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤86: sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 73%) and RBANS (AUC = 0.846, 95% CIs [0.746, 0.947], SE = 0.052; optimal cut-off ≤83: sensitivity = 89%, specificity = 67%) at multiple cut-off points. Removing participants with a history of polysubstance from the samples (10 ALs and 1 ARBD) improved the diagnostic capabilities of the RBANS substantially (AUC = 0.915, 95% CIs [0.831, 0.999], SE = 0.043; optimal cut-off ≤85: sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 80%), while only minor improvements to the ACE-III’s accuracy were observed (AUC = 0.854, 95% CIs [0.744, 0.963], SE = 0.056; optimal cut-off ≤88: sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Overall, both the ACE-III and RBANS are suitable tools for ARBD screening within an alcohol-dependent population, though the RBANS is the superior of the two. Clinicians using these tools for ARBD screening should be cautious of false-positive outcomes and should therefore combine them with other assessment methods (e.g., neuroimaging, clinical observations) and more detailed neuropsychological testing before reaching diagnostic decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6892773/ /pubmed/31849759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636 Text en Copyright © 2019 Brown, Heirene, Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John and Evans. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Brown, Pamela Heirene, Robert M. Gareth-Roderique-Davies, John, Bev Evans, Jonathan J. Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title | Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title_full | Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title_fullStr | Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title_short | Applicability of the ACE-III and RBANS Cognitive Tests for the Detection of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage |
title_sort | applicability of the ace-iii and rbans cognitive tests for the detection of alcohol-related brain damage |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6892773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownpamela applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage AT heirenerobertm applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage AT garethroderiquedavies applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage AT johnbev applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage AT evansjonathanj applicabilityoftheaceiiiandrbanscognitivetestsforthedetectionofalcoholrelatedbraindamage |