Cargando…

Bone healing at non-submerged implants installed with different insertion torques: a split-mouth histomorphometric randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate histomorphometrically the healing at implants installed with standard or very low insertion torque values MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve volunteer patients were recruited, and two screw-shaped titanium devices were installed in the distal segments of the mandible using insertio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amari, Yoshiyuki, Piattelli, Adriano, Apaza Alccayhuaman, Karol Alí, Mesa, Natalia Fortich, Ferri, Mauro, Iezzi, Giovanna, Botticelli, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0194-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate histomorphometrically the healing at implants installed with standard or very low insertion torque values MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve volunteer patients were recruited, and two screw-shaped titanium devices were installed in the distal segments of the mandible using insertion torque values of either < 10 Ncm or ~ 30 Ncm. The implants were left to heal in a non-submerged fashion. After 8 weeks, biopsies were retrieved, and ground sections were prepared for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Histological slides from 11 patients were available for (n = 11). The new bone in contact with the implant surface was 39.3 ± 18.5% and 49.4 ± 9.4% at the < 10 and ~ 30 Ncm sites, respectively. Considering the pre-existing old bone, the total mineralized bone was 46.8 ± 22.1% at the < 10 Ncm sites and 57.0 ± 14.1% at the ~ 30 Ncm. No statistically significant differences were found. New bone density and total mineralized bone density were 36.6 ± 8.1% and 53.0 ± 13.5% at the < 10 Ncm sites and 35.9 ± 10.0% and 52.2 ± 16.0% at the ~ 30 Ncm sites, respectively. No statistically significant differences were disclosed. CONCLUSION: From the data of the present study, it can be concluded that a trend of higher osseointegration was observed at the ~ 30 Ncm compared to the < 10 Ncm torque group. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that an implant installed with a very low torque may achieve a good integration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04017156; trial retrospectively registered on 12 July 2019.