The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making

Peer review to allocate funding for researchers and projects has faced difficulties lately and come under criticism. Various alternatives and improvements are being tested to address these problems.[Image: see text]

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bendiscioli, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Science & Society
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31680417
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949472
_version_ 1783476181106950144
author Bendiscioli, Sandra
author_facet Bendiscioli, Sandra
author_sort Bendiscioli, Sandra
collection PubMed
description Peer review to allocate funding for researchers and projects has faced difficulties lately and come under criticism. Various alternatives and improvements are being tested to address these problems.[Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6893288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68932882019-12-16 The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making Bendiscioli, Sandra EMBO Rep Science & Society Peer review to allocate funding for researchers and projects has faced difficulties lately and come under criticism. Various alternatives and improvements are being tested to address these problems.[Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-03 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6893288/ /pubmed/31680417 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949472 Text en © 2019 The Author. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Science & Society
Bendiscioli, Sandra
The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title_full The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title_fullStr The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title_full_unstemmed The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title_short The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
title_sort troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making
topic Science & Society
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31680417
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949472
work_keys_str_mv AT bendisciolisandra thetroubleswithpeerreviewforallocatingresearchfundingfundersneedtoexperimentwithversionsofpeerreviewanddecisionmaking
AT bendisciolisandra troubleswithpeerreviewforallocatingresearchfundingfundersneedtoexperimentwithversionsofpeerreviewanddecisionmaking

Ejemplares similares