Cargando…

Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited

The need for robust estimates of times of divergence is essential for downstream analyses, yet assessing this robustness is still rare. We generated a time-calibrated genus-level phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea), including 994 taxa, up to 10 gene fragments and an unprecedented set of 12 foss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chazot, Nicolas, Wahlberg, Niklas, Freitas, André Victor Lucci, Mitter, Charles, Labandeira, Conrad, Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar, Seraphim, Noemy, de Jong, Rienk, Heikkilä, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz002
_version_ 1783476182039134208
author Chazot, Nicolas
Wahlberg, Niklas
Freitas, André Victor Lucci
Mitter, Charles
Labandeira, Conrad
Sohn, Jae-Cheon
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
Seraphim, Noemy
de Jong, Rienk
Heikkilä, Maria
author_facet Chazot, Nicolas
Wahlberg, Niklas
Freitas, André Victor Lucci
Mitter, Charles
Labandeira, Conrad
Sohn, Jae-Cheon
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
Seraphim, Noemy
de Jong, Rienk
Heikkilä, Maria
author_sort Chazot, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description The need for robust estimates of times of divergence is essential for downstream analyses, yet assessing this robustness is still rare. We generated a time-calibrated genus-level phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea), including 994 taxa, up to 10 gene fragments and an unprecedented set of 12 fossils and 10 host-plant node calibration points. We compared marginal priors and posterior distributions to assess the relative importance of the former on the latter. This approach revealed a strong influence of the set of priors on the root age but for most calibrated nodes posterior distributions shifted from the marginal prior, indicating significant information in the molecular data set. Using a very conservative approach we estimated an origin of butterflies at 107.6 Ma, approximately equivalent to the latest Early Cretaceous, with a credibility interval ranging from 89.5 Ma (mid Late Cretaceous) to 129.5 Ma (mid Early Cretaceous). In addition, we tested the effects of changing fossil calibration priors, tree prior, different sets of calibrations and different sampling fractions but our estimate remained robust to these alternative assumptions. With 994 genera, this tree provides a comprehensive source of secondary calibrations for studies on butterflies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6893297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68932972019-12-10 Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited Chazot, Nicolas Wahlberg, Niklas Freitas, André Victor Lucci Mitter, Charles Labandeira, Conrad Sohn, Jae-Cheon Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar Seraphim, Noemy de Jong, Rienk Heikkilä, Maria Syst Biol Regular Articles The need for robust estimates of times of divergence is essential for downstream analyses, yet assessing this robustness is still rare. We generated a time-calibrated genus-level phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea), including 994 taxa, up to 10 gene fragments and an unprecedented set of 12 fossils and 10 host-plant node calibration points. We compared marginal priors and posterior distributions to assess the relative importance of the former on the latter. This approach revealed a strong influence of the set of priors on the root age but for most calibrated nodes posterior distributions shifted from the marginal prior, indicating significant information in the molecular data set. Using a very conservative approach we estimated an origin of butterflies at 107.6 Ma, approximately equivalent to the latest Early Cretaceous, with a credibility interval ranging from 89.5 Ma (mid Late Cretaceous) to 129.5 Ma (mid Early Cretaceous). In addition, we tested the effects of changing fossil calibration priors, tree prior, different sets of calibrations and different sampling fractions but our estimate remained robust to these alternative assumptions. With 994 genera, this tree provides a comprehensive source of secondary calibrations for studies on butterflies. Oxford University Press 2019-09 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6893297/ /pubmed/30690622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz002 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Chazot, Nicolas
Wahlberg, Niklas
Freitas, André Victor Lucci
Mitter, Charles
Labandeira, Conrad
Sohn, Jae-Cheon
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
Seraphim, Noemy
de Jong, Rienk
Heikkilä, Maria
Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title_full Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title_fullStr Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title_short Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: The Age of Butterflies Revisited
title_sort priors and posteriors in bayesian timing of divergence analyses: the age of butterflies revisited
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz002
work_keys_str_mv AT chazotnicolas priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT wahlbergniklas priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT freitasandrevictorlucci priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT mittercharles priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT labandeiraconrad priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT sohnjaecheon priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT sahooranjitkumar priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT seraphimnoemy priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT dejongrienk priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited
AT heikkilamaria priorsandposteriorsinbayesiantimingofdivergenceanalysestheageofbutterfliesrevisited