Cargando…
Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study
To determine whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with a higher rate of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications; to assess the value of IAP as a predictor of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112616 |
_version_ | 1783476259373711360 |
---|---|
author | Bordejé, M Luisa Montejo, Juan C. Mateu, M Lidón Solera, Manuel Acosta, Jose A. Juan, Mar García-Córdoba, Francisco García-Martínez, Miguel A. Gastaldo, Rosa |
author_facet | Bordejé, M Luisa Montejo, Juan C. Mateu, M Lidón Solera, Manuel Acosta, Jose A. Juan, Mar García-Córdoba, Francisco García-Martínez, Miguel A. Gastaldo, Rosa |
author_sort | Bordejé, M Luisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | To determine whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with a higher rate of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications; to assess the value of IAP as a predictor of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation requiring at least 5 days of EN were recruited for a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study. EN was performed and GI complications were managed with an established protocol. IAP was determined via a urinary catheter. Patients who developed any GI complications were considered as presenting EN intolerance. Variables related to EN, IAP and GI complications were monitored daily. Statistical analysis compared patients without GI complications (group A) vs. GI complications (group B). 247 patients were recruited from 28 participating ICUs (group A: 119, group B: 128). No differences between groups were recorded. Patients in group B (p < 0.001) spent more days on EN (8.1 ± 8.4 vs. 18.1 ± 13.7), on mechanical ventilation (8.0 ± 7.7 vs. 19.3 ± 14.9) and in the ICU (12.3 ± 11.4 vs. 24.8 ± 17.5). IAP prior to the GI complication was (14.3 ± 3.1 vs. 15.8 ± 4.8) (p < 0.003). The best IAP value identified for EN intolerance was 14 mmHg but it had low sensitivity and specificity. Although a higher IAP was associated with EN intolerance, IAP alone did not emerge as a good predictor of EN intolerance in critically ill patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6893696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68936962019-12-23 Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study Bordejé, M Luisa Montejo, Juan C. Mateu, M Lidón Solera, Manuel Acosta, Jose A. Juan, Mar García-Córdoba, Francisco García-Martínez, Miguel A. Gastaldo, Rosa Nutrients Article To determine whether elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with a higher rate of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications; to assess the value of IAP as a predictor of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation requiring at least 5 days of EN were recruited for a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study. EN was performed and GI complications were managed with an established protocol. IAP was determined via a urinary catheter. Patients who developed any GI complications were considered as presenting EN intolerance. Variables related to EN, IAP and GI complications were monitored daily. Statistical analysis compared patients without GI complications (group A) vs. GI complications (group B). 247 patients were recruited from 28 participating ICUs (group A: 119, group B: 128). No differences between groups were recorded. Patients in group B (p < 0.001) spent more days on EN (8.1 ± 8.4 vs. 18.1 ± 13.7), on mechanical ventilation (8.0 ± 7.7 vs. 19.3 ± 14.9) and in the ICU (12.3 ± 11.4 vs. 24.8 ± 17.5). IAP prior to the GI complication was (14.3 ± 3.1 vs. 15.8 ± 4.8) (p < 0.003). The best IAP value identified for EN intolerance was 14 mmHg but it had low sensitivity and specificity. Although a higher IAP was associated with EN intolerance, IAP alone did not emerge as a good predictor of EN intolerance in critically ill patients. MDPI 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6893696/ /pubmed/31683850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112616 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bordejé, M Luisa Montejo, Juan C. Mateu, M Lidón Solera, Manuel Acosta, Jose A. Juan, Mar García-Córdoba, Francisco García-Martínez, Miguel A. Gastaldo, Rosa Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title | Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title_full | Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title_fullStr | Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title_short | Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study |
title_sort | intra-abdominal pressure as a marker of enteral nutrition intolerance in critically ill patients. the piane study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bordejemluisa intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT montejojuanc intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT mateumlidon intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT soleramanuel intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT acostajosea intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT juanmar intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT garciacordobafrancisco intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT garciamartinezmiguela intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT gastaldorosa intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy AT intraabdominalpressureasamarkerofenteralnutritionintoleranceincriticallyillpatientsthepianestudy |