Cargando…
Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Nuclear Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098 |
_version_ | 1783476322381594624 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Terence Z. Benefield, Thad Masters, Shane Kiser, Jackson W. Crowley, James Osborne, Dustin Mawlawi, Osama Barnwell, James Gupta, Pawan Mintz, Akiva Ryan, Kelley A. Perrin, Steven R. Lattanze, Ronald K. Townsend, David W. |
author_facet | Wong, Terence Z. Benefield, Thad Masters, Shane Kiser, Jackson W. Crowley, James Osborne, Dustin Mawlawi, Osama Barnwell, James Gupta, Pawan Mintz, Akiva Ryan, Kelley A. Perrin, Steven R. Lattanze, Ronald K. Townsend, David W. |
author_sort | Wong, Terence Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration quality control and quality assurance. Our objectives were to quantify infiltration rates, determine associative factors for infiltration, and assess whether rates could be reduced at multiple centers and then sustained. Methods: A “design, measure, analyze, improve, and control” quality improvement methodology requiring novel technology was used to try to improve PET/CT injection quality. Teams were educated on the importance of quality injections. Baseline infiltration rates were measured, center-specific associative factors were analyzed, team meetings were held, improvement plans were established and executed, and rates remeasured. To ensure that injection-quality gains were retained, real-time feedback and ongoing monitoring were used. Sustainability was assessed. Results: Seven centers and 56 technologists provided data on 5,541 injections. The centers’ aggregated baseline infiltration rate was 6.2% (range, 2%–16%). On the basis of their specific associative factors, 4 centers developed improvement plans and reduced their aggregated infiltration rate from 8.9% to 4.6% (P < 0.0001). Ongoing injection monitoring showed sustainability. Significant variation was found in center- and technologist-level infiltration rates (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0020, respectively). Conclusion: A quality improvement approach with new technology can help centers measure infiltration rates, determine associative factors, implement interventions, and improve and sustain injection quality. Because PET/CT images help guide patient management, the monitoring and improvement of radiotracer injection quality are important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6894099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Society of Nuclear Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68940992019-12-06 Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers Wong, Terence Z. Benefield, Thad Masters, Shane Kiser, Jackson W. Crowley, James Osborne, Dustin Mawlawi, Osama Barnwell, James Gupta, Pawan Mintz, Akiva Ryan, Kelley A. Perrin, Steven R. Lattanze, Ronald K. Townsend, David W. J Nucl Med Technol Quality & Practice Management PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration quality control and quality assurance. Our objectives were to quantify infiltration rates, determine associative factors for infiltration, and assess whether rates could be reduced at multiple centers and then sustained. Methods: A “design, measure, analyze, improve, and control” quality improvement methodology requiring novel technology was used to try to improve PET/CT injection quality. Teams were educated on the importance of quality injections. Baseline infiltration rates were measured, center-specific associative factors were analyzed, team meetings were held, improvement plans were established and executed, and rates remeasured. To ensure that injection-quality gains were retained, real-time feedback and ongoing monitoring were used. Sustainability was assessed. Results: Seven centers and 56 technologists provided data on 5,541 injections. The centers’ aggregated baseline infiltration rate was 6.2% (range, 2%–16%). On the basis of their specific associative factors, 4 centers developed improvement plans and reduced their aggregated infiltration rate from 8.9% to 4.6% (P < 0.0001). Ongoing injection monitoring showed sustainability. Significant variation was found in center- and technologist-level infiltration rates (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0020, respectively). Conclusion: A quality improvement approach with new technology can help centers measure infiltration rates, determine associative factors, implement interventions, and improve and sustain injection quality. Because PET/CT images help guide patient management, the monitoring and improvement of radiotracer injection quality are important. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6894099/ /pubmed/31182666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098 Text en © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml. |
spellingShingle | Quality & Practice Management Wong, Terence Z. Benefield, Thad Masters, Shane Kiser, Jackson W. Crowley, James Osborne, Dustin Mawlawi, Osama Barnwell, James Gupta, Pawan Mintz, Akiva Ryan, Kelley A. Perrin, Steven R. Lattanze, Ronald K. Townsend, David W. Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title | Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title_full | Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title_fullStr | Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title_short | Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers |
title_sort | quality improvement initiatives to assess and improve pet/ct injection infiltration rates at multiple centers |
topic | Quality & Practice Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongterencez qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT benefieldthad qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT mastersshane qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT kiserjacksonw qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT crowleyjames qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT osbornedustin qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT mawlawiosama qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT barnwelljames qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT guptapawan qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT mintzakiva qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT ryankelleya qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT perrinstevenr qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT lattanzeronaldk qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters AT townsenddavidw qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters |