Cargando…

Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers

PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Terence Z., Benefield, Thad, Masters, Shane, Kiser, Jackson W., Crowley, James, Osborne, Dustin, Mawlawi, Osama, Barnwell, James, Gupta, Pawan, Mintz, Akiva, Ryan, Kelley A., Perrin, Steven R., Lattanze, Ronald K., Townsend, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098
_version_ 1783476322381594624
author Wong, Terence Z.
Benefield, Thad
Masters, Shane
Kiser, Jackson W.
Crowley, James
Osborne, Dustin
Mawlawi, Osama
Barnwell, James
Gupta, Pawan
Mintz, Akiva
Ryan, Kelley A.
Perrin, Steven R.
Lattanze, Ronald K.
Townsend, David W.
author_facet Wong, Terence Z.
Benefield, Thad
Masters, Shane
Kiser, Jackson W.
Crowley, James
Osborne, Dustin
Mawlawi, Osama
Barnwell, James
Gupta, Pawan
Mintz, Akiva
Ryan, Kelley A.
Perrin, Steven R.
Lattanze, Ronald K.
Townsend, David W.
author_sort Wong, Terence Z.
collection PubMed
description PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration quality control and quality assurance. Our objectives were to quantify infiltration rates, determine associative factors for infiltration, and assess whether rates could be reduced at multiple centers and then sustained. Methods: A “design, measure, analyze, improve, and control” quality improvement methodology requiring novel technology was used to try to improve PET/CT injection quality. Teams were educated on the importance of quality injections. Baseline infiltration rates were measured, center-specific associative factors were analyzed, team meetings were held, improvement plans were established and executed, and rates remeasured. To ensure that injection-quality gains were retained, real-time feedback and ongoing monitoring were used. Sustainability was assessed. Results: Seven centers and 56 technologists provided data on 5,541 injections. The centers’ aggregated baseline infiltration rate was 6.2% (range, 2%–16%). On the basis of their specific associative factors, 4 centers developed improvement plans and reduced their aggregated infiltration rate from 8.9% to 4.6% (P < 0.0001). Ongoing injection monitoring showed sustainability. Significant variation was found in center- and technologist-level infiltration rates (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0020, respectively). Conclusion: A quality improvement approach with new technology can help centers measure infiltration rates, determine associative factors, implement interventions, and improve and sustain injection quality. Because PET/CT images help guide patient management, the monitoring and improvement of radiotracer injection quality are important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68940992019-12-06 Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers Wong, Terence Z. Benefield, Thad Masters, Shane Kiser, Jackson W. Crowley, James Osborne, Dustin Mawlawi, Osama Barnwell, James Gupta, Pawan Mintz, Akiva Ryan, Kelley A. Perrin, Steven R. Lattanze, Ronald K. Townsend, David W. J Nucl Med Technol Quality & Practice Management PET/CT radiotracer infiltration is not uncommon and is often outside the imaging field of view. Infiltration can negatively affect image quality, image quantification, and patient management. Until recently, there has not been a simple way to routinely practice PET radiopharmaceutical administration quality control and quality assurance. Our objectives were to quantify infiltration rates, determine associative factors for infiltration, and assess whether rates could be reduced at multiple centers and then sustained. Methods: A “design, measure, analyze, improve, and control” quality improvement methodology requiring novel technology was used to try to improve PET/CT injection quality. Teams were educated on the importance of quality injections. Baseline infiltration rates were measured, center-specific associative factors were analyzed, team meetings were held, improvement plans were established and executed, and rates remeasured. To ensure that injection-quality gains were retained, real-time feedback and ongoing monitoring were used. Sustainability was assessed. Results: Seven centers and 56 technologists provided data on 5,541 injections. The centers’ aggregated baseline infiltration rate was 6.2% (range, 2%–16%). On the basis of their specific associative factors, 4 centers developed improvement plans and reduced their aggregated infiltration rate from 8.9% to 4.6% (P < 0.0001). Ongoing injection monitoring showed sustainability. Significant variation was found in center- and technologist-level infiltration rates (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0020, respectively). Conclusion: A quality improvement approach with new technology can help centers measure infiltration rates, determine associative factors, implement interventions, and improve and sustain injection quality. Because PET/CT images help guide patient management, the monitoring and improvement of radiotracer injection quality are important. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6894099/ /pubmed/31182666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098 Text en © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Quality & Practice Management
Wong, Terence Z.
Benefield, Thad
Masters, Shane
Kiser, Jackson W.
Crowley, James
Osborne, Dustin
Mawlawi, Osama
Barnwell, James
Gupta, Pawan
Mintz, Akiva
Ryan, Kelley A.
Perrin, Steven R.
Lattanze, Ronald K.
Townsend, David W.
Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title_full Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title_fullStr Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title_short Quality Improvement Initiatives to Assess and Improve PET/CT Injection Infiltration Rates at Multiple Centers
title_sort quality improvement initiatives to assess and improve pet/ct injection infiltration rates at multiple centers
topic Quality & Practice Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31182666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.228098
work_keys_str_mv AT wongterencez qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT benefieldthad qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT mastersshane qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT kiserjacksonw qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT crowleyjames qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT osbornedustin qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT mawlawiosama qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT barnwelljames qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT guptapawan qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT mintzakiva qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT ryankelleya qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT perrinstevenr qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT lattanzeronaldk qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters
AT townsenddavidw qualityimprovementinitiativestoassessandimprovepetctinjectioninfiltrationratesatmultiplecenters