Cargando…

Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: There is a concern regarding the use of a closed-suction drain (CSD) in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection as it may decrease the antibiotic concentrations in the joint fluids. The purpose of this study was to identify whether the use of a CSD could reduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Chi, Jia, Cheng-Qi, Kuo, Feng-Chih, Chai, Wei, Zhang, Ming-Hua, Chen, Ji-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2974-5
_version_ 1783476343476846592
author Xu, Chi
Jia, Cheng-Qi
Kuo, Feng-Chih
Chai, Wei
Zhang, Ming-Hua
Chen, Ji-Ying
author_facet Xu, Chi
Jia, Cheng-Qi
Kuo, Feng-Chih
Chai, Wei
Zhang, Ming-Hua
Chen, Ji-Ying
author_sort Xu, Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a concern regarding the use of a closed-suction drain (CSD) in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection as it may decrease the antibiotic concentrations in the joint fluids. The purpose of this study was to identify whether the use of a CSD could reduce local antibiotic concentrations following spacer implantation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at our institution between January 2018 and November 2018. We enrolled 32 patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection with an interim cement spacer containing 4-g vancomycin and 2-g meropenem per 40-g methyl-methacrylate cement polymer. Patients were randomized and evenly divided into the study group (non-CSD) and control group (CSD group) by sealed envelopes. Drainage samples of joint fluids (n = 160) were collected every 24 h for the first five days following spacer implantation. The antibiotic concentrations of drainage samples were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the bioactivities of the drainage samples against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) and E. coli were assessed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the decrease of vancomycin (study group vs. control group: 163.20 ± 77.05 vs. 162.39 ± 36.31; p = 0.917) and meropenem concentration (123.78 ± 21.04 vs. 117.27 ± 19.38; P = 0.548) between the two groups during the first five days following spacer implantation. All joint drainage samples in each group exhibited antibacterial activity against MSSA, MRSA and E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CSD following the implantation of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer does not reduce the effectiveness of such a spacer in two-stage exchange arthroplasty. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-17014162. Registered 26 December 2017.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68942122019-12-11 Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study Xu, Chi Jia, Cheng-Qi Kuo, Feng-Chih Chai, Wei Zhang, Ming-Hua Chen, Ji-Ying BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a concern regarding the use of a closed-suction drain (CSD) in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection as it may decrease the antibiotic concentrations in the joint fluids. The purpose of this study was to identify whether the use of a CSD could reduce local antibiotic concentrations following spacer implantation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at our institution between January 2018 and November 2018. We enrolled 32 patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection with an interim cement spacer containing 4-g vancomycin and 2-g meropenem per 40-g methyl-methacrylate cement polymer. Patients were randomized and evenly divided into the study group (non-CSD) and control group (CSD group) by sealed envelopes. Drainage samples of joint fluids (n = 160) were collected every 24 h for the first five days following spacer implantation. The antibiotic concentrations of drainage samples were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the bioactivities of the drainage samples against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) and E. coli were assessed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the decrease of vancomycin (study group vs. control group: 163.20 ± 77.05 vs. 162.39 ± 36.31; p = 0.917) and meropenem concentration (123.78 ± 21.04 vs. 117.27 ± 19.38; P = 0.548) between the two groups during the first five days following spacer implantation. All joint drainage samples in each group exhibited antibacterial activity against MSSA, MRSA and E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CSD following the implantation of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer does not reduce the effectiveness of such a spacer in two-stage exchange arthroplasty. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-17014162. Registered 26 December 2017.) BioMed Central 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6894212/ /pubmed/31801510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2974-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Chi
Jia, Cheng-Qi
Kuo, Feng-Chih
Chai, Wei
Zhang, Ming-Hua
Chen, Ji-Ying
Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title_full Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title_fullStr Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title_short Does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic hip infection? A prospective, randomized, controlled study
title_sort does the use of a closed-suction drain reduce the effectiveness of an antibiotic-loaded spacer in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection? a prospective, randomized, controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2974-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xuchi doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jiachengqi doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kuofengchih doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chaiwei doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangminghua doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chenjiying doestheuseofaclosedsuctiondrainreducetheeffectivenessofanantibioticloadedspacerintwostageexchangearthroplastyforperiprosthetichipinfectionaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy