Cargando…

Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Rate of FEV(1) decline in COPD is heterogeneous and the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) influence the rate of decline is unclear. The majority of previous reviews have investigated specific ICS and non-ICS inhalers and have consisted of randomised control trials (RCTs), which have spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittaker, Hannah R., Jarvis, Debbie, Sheikh, Mohamed R., Kiddle, Steven J., Quint, Jennifer K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1249-x
_version_ 1783476358428491776
author Whittaker, Hannah R.
Jarvis, Debbie
Sheikh, Mohamed R.
Kiddle, Steven J.
Quint, Jennifer K.
author_facet Whittaker, Hannah R.
Jarvis, Debbie
Sheikh, Mohamed R.
Kiddle, Steven J.
Quint, Jennifer K.
author_sort Whittaker, Hannah R.
collection PubMed
description Rate of FEV(1) decline in COPD is heterogeneous and the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) influence the rate of decline is unclear. The majority of previous reviews have investigated specific ICS and non-ICS inhalers and have consisted of randomised control trials (RCTs), which have specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and short follow up times. We aimed to investigate the association between change in FEV(1) and ICS-containing medications in COPD patients over longer follow up times. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched and literature comparing change in FEV(1) in COPD patients taking ICS-containing medications with patients taking non-ICS-containing medications were identified. Titles, abstract, and full texts were screened and information extracted using the PICO checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and a descriptive synthesis of the literature was carried out due to high heterogeneity of included studies. Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. We found that the difference in change in FEV(1) in people using ICS and non-ICS containing medications depended on the study follow-up time. Shorter follow-up studies (1 year or less) were more likely to report an increase in FEV(1) from baseline in both patients on ICS and in patients on non-ICS-containing medications, with the majority of these studies showing a greater increase in FEV(1) in patients on ICS-containing medications. Longer follow-up studies (greater than 1 year) were more likely to report a decline in FEV(1) from baseline in patients on ICS and in patients on non-ICS containing medications but rates of FEV(1) decline were similar. Further studies are needed to better understand changes in FEV(1) when ICS-containing medications are prescribed and to determine whether ICS-containing medications influence rate of decline in FEV(1) in the long term. Results from inclusive trials and observational patient cohorts may provide information more generalisable to a population of COPD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68942752019-12-11 Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review Whittaker, Hannah R. Jarvis, Debbie Sheikh, Mohamed R. Kiddle, Steven J. Quint, Jennifer K. Respir Res Review Rate of FEV(1) decline in COPD is heterogeneous and the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) influence the rate of decline is unclear. The majority of previous reviews have investigated specific ICS and non-ICS inhalers and have consisted of randomised control trials (RCTs), which have specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and short follow up times. We aimed to investigate the association between change in FEV(1) and ICS-containing medications in COPD patients over longer follow up times. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched and literature comparing change in FEV(1) in COPD patients taking ICS-containing medications with patients taking non-ICS-containing medications were identified. Titles, abstract, and full texts were screened and information extracted using the PICO checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and a descriptive synthesis of the literature was carried out due to high heterogeneity of included studies. Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. We found that the difference in change in FEV(1) in people using ICS and non-ICS containing medications depended on the study follow-up time. Shorter follow-up studies (1 year or less) were more likely to report an increase in FEV(1) from baseline in both patients on ICS and in patients on non-ICS-containing medications, with the majority of these studies showing a greater increase in FEV(1) in patients on ICS-containing medications. Longer follow-up studies (greater than 1 year) were more likely to report a decline in FEV(1) from baseline in patients on ICS and in patients on non-ICS containing medications but rates of FEV(1) decline were similar. Further studies are needed to better understand changes in FEV(1) when ICS-containing medications are prescribed and to determine whether ICS-containing medications influence rate of decline in FEV(1) in the long term. Results from inclusive trials and observational patient cohorts may provide information more generalisable to a population of COPD patients. BioMed Central 2019-12-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6894275/ /pubmed/31801539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1249-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Whittaker, Hannah R.
Jarvis, Debbie
Sheikh, Mohamed R.
Kiddle, Steven J.
Quint, Jennifer K.
Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title_full Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title_fullStr Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title_short Inhaled corticosteroids and FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
title_sort inhaled corticosteroids and fev(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1249-x
work_keys_str_mv AT whittakerhannahr inhaledcorticosteroidsandfev1declineinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview
AT jarvisdebbie inhaledcorticosteroidsandfev1declineinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview
AT sheikhmohamedr inhaledcorticosteroidsandfev1declineinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview
AT kiddlestevenj inhaledcorticosteroidsandfev1declineinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview
AT quintjenniferk inhaledcorticosteroidsandfev1declineinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview