Cargando…

Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifert, Lukas B., Socolan, Octavian, Sader, Robert, Rüsseler, Miriam, Sterz, Jasmina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1
_version_ 1783476376174592000
author Seifert, Lukas B.
Socolan, Octavian
Sader, Robert
Rüsseler, Miriam
Sterz, Jasmina
author_facet Seifert, Lukas B.
Socolan, Octavian
Sader, Robert
Rüsseler, Miriam
Sterz, Jasmina
author_sort Seifert, Lukas B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefit of VP as an additive or also as an alternative to traditional teaching formats remains unclear. Moreover, there are no randomized-controlled studies that investigated the use of VP in a dental curriculum. Therefore, this study investigates VP as an alternative to lecturer-led small-group teaching in a curricular, randomized and controlled setting. METHODS: Randomized and controlled cohort study. Four VP cases were created according to previously published design principles and compared with lecturer-led small group teaching (SGT) within the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clerkship for dental students at the Department for Cranio-, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Clinical competence was measured prior (T0), directly (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after the intervention using theoretical tests and a self-assessment questionnaire. Furthermore, VP design was evaluated using a validated toolkit. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students (VP = 32; SGT = 25) agreed to participate in the study. No competence differences were found at T0 (p = 0.56). The VP group outperformed (p < .0001) the SGT group at T1. At T2 there was no difference between both groups (p = 0.55). Both interventions led to a significant growth in self-assessed competence. The VP group felt better prepared to diagnose and treat real patients and regarded VP cases as a rewarding learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: VP cases are an effective alternative to lecture-led SGT in terms of learning efficacy in the short and long-term as well as self-assessed competence growth and student satisfaction. Furthermore, integrating VP cases within a curricular Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clerkship is feasible and leads to substantial growth of clinical competence in undergraduate dental students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68943502019-12-11 Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial Seifert, Lukas B. Socolan, Octavian Sader, Robert Rüsseler, Miriam Sterz, Jasmina BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefit of VP as an additive or also as an alternative to traditional teaching formats remains unclear. Moreover, there are no randomized-controlled studies that investigated the use of VP in a dental curriculum. Therefore, this study investigates VP as an alternative to lecturer-led small-group teaching in a curricular, randomized and controlled setting. METHODS: Randomized and controlled cohort study. Four VP cases were created according to previously published design principles and compared with lecturer-led small group teaching (SGT) within the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clerkship for dental students at the Department for Cranio-, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Clinical competence was measured prior (T0), directly (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after the intervention using theoretical tests and a self-assessment questionnaire. Furthermore, VP design was evaluated using a validated toolkit. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students (VP = 32; SGT = 25) agreed to participate in the study. No competence differences were found at T0 (p = 0.56). The VP group outperformed (p < .0001) the SGT group at T1. At T2 there was no difference between both groups (p = 0.55). Both interventions led to a significant growth in self-assessed competence. The VP group felt better prepared to diagnose and treat real patients and regarded VP cases as a rewarding learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: VP cases are an effective alternative to lecture-led SGT in terms of learning efficacy in the short and long-term as well as self-assessed competence growth and student satisfaction. Furthermore, integrating VP cases within a curricular Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clerkship is feasible and leads to substantial growth of clinical competence in undergraduate dental students. BioMed Central 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6894350/ /pubmed/31801531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seifert, Lukas B.
Socolan, Octavian
Sader, Robert
Rüsseler, Miriam
Sterz, Jasmina
Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1
work_keys_str_mv AT seifertlukasb virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT socolanoctavian virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saderrobert virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT russelermiriam virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sterzjasmina virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial