Cargando…
Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1 |
_version_ | 1783476376174592000 |
---|---|
author | Seifert, Lukas B. Socolan, Octavian Sader, Robert Rüsseler, Miriam Sterz, Jasmina |
author_facet | Seifert, Lukas B. Socolan, Octavian Sader, Robert Rüsseler, Miriam Sterz, Jasmina |
author_sort | Seifert, Lukas B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefit of VP as an additive or also as an alternative to traditional teaching formats remains unclear. Moreover, there are no randomized-controlled studies that investigated the use of VP in a dental curriculum. Therefore, this study investigates VP as an alternative to lecturer-led small-group teaching in a curricular, randomized and controlled setting. METHODS: Randomized and controlled cohort study. Four VP cases were created according to previously published design principles and compared with lecturer-led small group teaching (SGT) within the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clerkship for dental students at the Department for Cranio-, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Clinical competence was measured prior (T0), directly (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after the intervention using theoretical tests and a self-assessment questionnaire. Furthermore, VP design was evaluated using a validated toolkit. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students (VP = 32; SGT = 25) agreed to participate in the study. No competence differences were found at T0 (p = 0.56). The VP group outperformed (p < .0001) the SGT group at T1. At T2 there was no difference between both groups (p = 0.55). Both interventions led to a significant growth in self-assessed competence. The VP group felt better prepared to diagnose and treat real patients and regarded VP cases as a rewarding learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: VP cases are an effective alternative to lecture-led SGT in terms of learning efficacy in the short and long-term as well as self-assessed competence growth and student satisfaction. Furthermore, integrating VP cases within a curricular Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clerkship is feasible and leads to substantial growth of clinical competence in undergraduate dental students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6894350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68943502019-12-11 Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial Seifert, Lukas B. Socolan, Octavian Sader, Robert Rüsseler, Miriam Sterz, Jasmina BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Computerized virtual patients (VP) have spread into many areas of healthcare delivery and medical education. They provide various advantages like flexibility in pace and space of learning, a high degree of teaching reproducibility and a cost effectiveness. However, the educational benefit of VP as an additive or also as an alternative to traditional teaching formats remains unclear. Moreover, there are no randomized-controlled studies that investigated the use of VP in a dental curriculum. Therefore, this study investigates VP as an alternative to lecturer-led small-group teaching in a curricular, randomized and controlled setting. METHODS: Randomized and controlled cohort study. Four VP cases were created according to previously published design principles and compared with lecturer-led small group teaching (SGT) within the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clerkship for dental students at the Department for Cranio-, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Clinical competence was measured prior (T0), directly (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after the intervention using theoretical tests and a self-assessment questionnaire. Furthermore, VP design was evaluated using a validated toolkit. RESULTS: Fifty-seven students (VP = 32; SGT = 25) agreed to participate in the study. No competence differences were found at T0 (p = 0.56). The VP group outperformed (p < .0001) the SGT group at T1. At T2 there was no difference between both groups (p = 0.55). Both interventions led to a significant growth in self-assessed competence. The VP group felt better prepared to diagnose and treat real patients and regarded VP cases as a rewarding learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: VP cases are an effective alternative to lecture-led SGT in terms of learning efficacy in the short and long-term as well as self-assessed competence growth and student satisfaction. Furthermore, integrating VP cases within a curricular Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clerkship is feasible and leads to substantial growth of clinical competence in undergraduate dental students. BioMed Central 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6894350/ /pubmed/31801531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seifert, Lukas B. Socolan, Octavian Sader, Robert Rüsseler, Miriam Sterz, Jasmina Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | virtual patients versus small-group teaching in the training of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1887-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seifertlukasb virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT socolanoctavian virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT saderrobert virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT russelermiriam virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sterzjasmina virtualpatientsversussmallgroupteachinginthetrainingoforalandmaxillofacialsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |