Cargando…

Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review

Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medic, Goran, Kosaner Kließ, Melodi, Atallah, Louis, Weichert, Jochen, Panda, Saswat, Postma, Maarten, EL-Kerdi, Amer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824670
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2
_version_ 1783476378516062208
author Medic, Goran
Kosaner Kließ, Melodi
Atallah, Louis
Weichert, Jochen
Panda, Saswat
Postma, Maarten
EL-Kerdi, Amer
author_facet Medic, Goran
Kosaner Kließ, Melodi
Atallah, Louis
Weichert, Jochen
Panda, Saswat
Postma, Maarten
EL-Kerdi, Amer
author_sort Medic, Goran
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or therapy course. Methods: This research aimed to identify evidence-based study designs and outcome measures to determine the clinical effectiveness of clinical decision support systems in the detection and prediction of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress, and infection within critical care settings. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched to identify primary research published in English between 2013 and 2018. Studies conducted in the USA, Canada, UK, Germany and France with more than 10 participants per arm were included. Results: In studies on hemodynamic instability, the prediction and management of septic shock were the most researched topics followed by the early prediction of heart failure. For respiratory distress, the most popular topics were pneumonia detection and prediction followed by pulmonary embolisms. Given the importance of imaging and clinical notes, this area combined Machine Learning with image analysis and natural language processing. In studies on infection, the most researched areas were the detection, prediction, and management of sepsis, surgical site infections, as well as acute kidney injury. Overall, a variety of Machine Learning algorithms were utilized frequently, particularly support vector machines, boosting techniques, random forest classifiers and neural networks. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC were the most frequently reported performance measures. Conclusion: This review showed an increasing use of Machine Learning for CDS in all three areas. Large datasets are required for training these algorithms; making it imperative to appropriately address, challenges such as class imbalance, correct labelling of data and missing data. Recommendations are formulated for the development and successful adoption of CDS systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68943612019-12-09 Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review Medic, Goran Kosaner Kließ, Melodi Atallah, Louis Weichert, Jochen Panda, Saswat Postma, Maarten EL-Kerdi, Amer F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or therapy course. Methods: This research aimed to identify evidence-based study designs and outcome measures to determine the clinical effectiveness of clinical decision support systems in the detection and prediction of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress, and infection within critical care settings. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched to identify primary research published in English between 2013 and 2018. Studies conducted in the USA, Canada, UK, Germany and France with more than 10 participants per arm were included. Results: In studies on hemodynamic instability, the prediction and management of septic shock were the most researched topics followed by the early prediction of heart failure. For respiratory distress, the most popular topics were pneumonia detection and prediction followed by pulmonary embolisms. Given the importance of imaging and clinical notes, this area combined Machine Learning with image analysis and natural language processing. In studies on infection, the most researched areas were the detection, prediction, and management of sepsis, surgical site infections, as well as acute kidney injury. Overall, a variety of Machine Learning algorithms were utilized frequently, particularly support vector machines, boosting techniques, random forest classifiers and neural networks. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC were the most frequently reported performance measures. Conclusion: This review showed an increasing use of Machine Learning for CDS in all three areas. Large datasets are required for training these algorithms; making it imperative to appropriately address, challenges such as class imbalance, correct labelling of data and missing data. Recommendations are formulated for the development and successful adoption of CDS systems. F1000 Research Limited 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6894361/ /pubmed/31824670 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medic G et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Medic, Goran
Kosaner Kließ, Melodi
Atallah, Louis
Weichert, Jochen
Panda, Saswat
Postma, Maarten
EL-Kerdi, Amer
Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title_full Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title_short Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
title_sort evidence-based clinical decision support systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: a systematic literature review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824670
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2
work_keys_str_mv AT medicgoran evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT kosanerkließmelodi evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT atallahlouis evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT weichertjochen evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT pandasaswat evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT postmamaarten evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview
AT elkerdiamer evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview