Cargando…
Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review
Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824670 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2 |
_version_ | 1783476378516062208 |
---|---|
author | Medic, Goran Kosaner Kließ, Melodi Atallah, Louis Weichert, Jochen Panda, Saswat Postma, Maarten EL-Kerdi, Amer |
author_facet | Medic, Goran Kosaner Kließ, Melodi Atallah, Louis Weichert, Jochen Panda, Saswat Postma, Maarten EL-Kerdi, Amer |
author_sort | Medic, Goran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or therapy course. Methods: This research aimed to identify evidence-based study designs and outcome measures to determine the clinical effectiveness of clinical decision support systems in the detection and prediction of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress, and infection within critical care settings. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched to identify primary research published in English between 2013 and 2018. Studies conducted in the USA, Canada, UK, Germany and France with more than 10 participants per arm were included. Results: In studies on hemodynamic instability, the prediction and management of septic shock were the most researched topics followed by the early prediction of heart failure. For respiratory distress, the most popular topics were pneumonia detection and prediction followed by pulmonary embolisms. Given the importance of imaging and clinical notes, this area combined Machine Learning with image analysis and natural language processing. In studies on infection, the most researched areas were the detection, prediction, and management of sepsis, surgical site infections, as well as acute kidney injury. Overall, a variety of Machine Learning algorithms were utilized frequently, particularly support vector machines, boosting techniques, random forest classifiers and neural networks. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC were the most frequently reported performance measures. Conclusion: This review showed an increasing use of Machine Learning for CDS in all three areas. Large datasets are required for training these algorithms; making it imperative to appropriately address, challenges such as class imbalance, correct labelling of data and missing data. Recommendations are formulated for the development and successful adoption of CDS systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6894361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68943612019-12-09 Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review Medic, Goran Kosaner Kließ, Melodi Atallah, Louis Weichert, Jochen Panda, Saswat Postma, Maarten EL-Kerdi, Amer F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have emerged as tools providing intelligent decision making to address challenges of critical care. CDS systems can be based on existing guidelines or best practices; and can also utilize machine learning to provide a diagnosis, recommendation, or therapy course. Methods: This research aimed to identify evidence-based study designs and outcome measures to determine the clinical effectiveness of clinical decision support systems in the detection and prediction of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress, and infection within critical care settings. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched to identify primary research published in English between 2013 and 2018. Studies conducted in the USA, Canada, UK, Germany and France with more than 10 participants per arm were included. Results: In studies on hemodynamic instability, the prediction and management of septic shock were the most researched topics followed by the early prediction of heart failure. For respiratory distress, the most popular topics were pneumonia detection and prediction followed by pulmonary embolisms. Given the importance of imaging and clinical notes, this area combined Machine Learning with image analysis and natural language processing. In studies on infection, the most researched areas were the detection, prediction, and management of sepsis, surgical site infections, as well as acute kidney injury. Overall, a variety of Machine Learning algorithms were utilized frequently, particularly support vector machines, boosting techniques, random forest classifiers and neural networks. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC were the most frequently reported performance measures. Conclusion: This review showed an increasing use of Machine Learning for CDS in all three areas. Large datasets are required for training these algorithms; making it imperative to appropriately address, challenges such as class imbalance, correct labelling of data and missing data. Recommendations are formulated for the development and successful adoption of CDS systems. F1000 Research Limited 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6894361/ /pubmed/31824670 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medic G et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Medic, Goran Kosaner Kließ, Melodi Atallah, Louis Weichert, Jochen Panda, Saswat Postma, Maarten EL-Kerdi, Amer Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title | Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title_full | Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title_short | Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: A systematic literature review |
title_sort | evidence-based clinical decision support systems for the prediction and detection of three disease states in critical care: a systematic literature review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824670 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20498.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT medicgoran evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT kosanerkließmelodi evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT atallahlouis evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT weichertjochen evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT pandasaswat evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT postmamaarten evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview AT elkerdiamer evidencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsforthepredictionanddetectionofthreediseasestatesincriticalcareasystematicliteraturereview |