Cargando…

A second puncture and injection technique for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of the second puncture and injection technique during a percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) procedure. METHODS: Patients treated with a second puncture and injection (group A) or a single puncture and injection (group B) during PVP at our institution during 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhaofei, Jiao, Feng, Huang, He, Feng, Yonghui, Xie, Chunliang, Liu, Donghua, Qin, Fengwei, Zhang, Sineng, Wu, Peiyu, Tan, Weiguang, Tang, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1498-x
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of the second puncture and injection technique during a percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) procedure. METHODS: Patients treated with a second puncture and injection (group A) or a single puncture and injection (group B) during PVP at our institution during 2010–2017 were reviewed. Vertebral height loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), adjacent vertebral fractures, and cement leakage were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were enrolled (86 cases in group A, 107 cases in group B). The follow-up period was 15.64 (12–20) months. The loss of anterior (group A 0.01 ± 0.03; group B 0.14 ± 0.17) and middle (group A 0.13 ± 0.12; group B 0.16 ± 0.11) vertebral height in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). The VAS score and ODI were also significantly higher in group B than in group A at the final follow-up; the VAS score and ODI in group B were 1.65 ± 0.70 and 14.50 ± 4.16, respectively, and those in group A were 1.00 ± 0.74 and 12.81 ± 4.02, respectively (P < 0.05). Three patients in group A and two in group B experienced adjacent vertebral fractures. Regarding mild, moderate, and severe cement leakage, there were 25 (29%), 5 (5%), and 0 cases, respectively, in group A and 28 (26%), 3 (2.8%), and 1 (0.009%) case, respectively, in group B (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The second puncture and injection technique may effectively increase the dispersion of cement, thus preventing recompression of the cemented vertebral body, and it does not increase the risk of cement leakage or adjacent vertebral fracture.