Cargando…

Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians

Teeth were an important innovation in vertebrate evolution but basic aspects of early dental evolution remain poorly understood. Teeth differ from other odontode organs, like scales, in their organized, sequential pattern of replacement. However, tooth replacement patterns also vary between the majo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doeland, Mark, Couzens, Aidan M. C., Donoghue, Philip C. J., Rücklin, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191173
_version_ 1783476412783525888
author Doeland, Mark
Couzens, Aidan M. C.
Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Rücklin, Martin
author_facet Doeland, Mark
Couzens, Aidan M. C.
Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Rücklin, Martin
author_sort Doeland, Mark
collection PubMed
description Teeth were an important innovation in vertebrate evolution but basic aspects of early dental evolution remain poorly understood. Teeth differ from other odontode organs, like scales, in their organized, sequential pattern of replacement. However, tooth replacement patterns also vary between the major groups of jawed vertebrates. Although tooth replacement in stem-osteichthyans and extant species has been intensively studied it has been difficult to resolve scenarios for the evolution of osteichthyan tooth replacement because of a dearth of evidence from living and fossil sarcopterygian fishes. Here we provide new anatomical data informing patterns of tooth replacement in the Devonian sarcopterygian fishes Onychodus, Eusthenopteron and Tiktaalik and the living coelacanth Latimeria based on microfocus- and synchrotron radiation-based X-ray microtomography. Early sarcopterygians generated replacement teeth on the jaw surface in a pattern similar to stem-osteichthyans, with damaged teeth resorbed and replacement teeth developed on the surface of the bone. However, resorption grades and development of replacement teeth vary spatially and temporally within the jaw. Particularly in Onychodus, where teeth were also shed through anterior rotation and resorption of bone at the base of the parasymphyseal tooth whorl, with new teeth added posteriorly. As tooth whorls are also present in more stem-osteichthyans, and statodont tooth whorls are present among acanthodians (putative stem-chondrichthyans), rotational replacement of the anterior dentition may be a stem-osteichthyan character. Our results suggest a more complex evolutionary history of tooth replacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68946002019-12-11 Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians Doeland, Mark Couzens, Aidan M. C. Donoghue, Philip C. J. Rücklin, Martin R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Teeth were an important innovation in vertebrate evolution but basic aspects of early dental evolution remain poorly understood. Teeth differ from other odontode organs, like scales, in their organized, sequential pattern of replacement. However, tooth replacement patterns also vary between the major groups of jawed vertebrates. Although tooth replacement in stem-osteichthyans and extant species has been intensively studied it has been difficult to resolve scenarios for the evolution of osteichthyan tooth replacement because of a dearth of evidence from living and fossil sarcopterygian fishes. Here we provide new anatomical data informing patterns of tooth replacement in the Devonian sarcopterygian fishes Onychodus, Eusthenopteron and Tiktaalik and the living coelacanth Latimeria based on microfocus- and synchrotron radiation-based X-ray microtomography. Early sarcopterygians generated replacement teeth on the jaw surface in a pattern similar to stem-osteichthyans, with damaged teeth resorbed and replacement teeth developed on the surface of the bone. However, resorption grades and development of replacement teeth vary spatially and temporally within the jaw. Particularly in Onychodus, where teeth were also shed through anterior rotation and resorption of bone at the base of the parasymphyseal tooth whorl, with new teeth added posteriorly. As tooth whorls are also present in more stem-osteichthyans, and statodont tooth whorls are present among acanthodians (putative stem-chondrichthyans), rotational replacement of the anterior dentition may be a stem-osteichthyan character. Our results suggest a more complex evolutionary history of tooth replacement. The Royal Society 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6894600/ /pubmed/31827852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191173 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Doeland, Mark
Couzens, Aidan M. C.
Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Rücklin, Martin
Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title_full Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title_fullStr Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title_full_unstemmed Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title_short Tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
title_sort tooth replacement in early sarcopterygians
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31827852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191173
work_keys_str_mv AT doelandmark toothreplacementinearlysarcopterygians
AT couzensaidanmc toothreplacementinearlysarcopterygians
AT donoghuephilipcj toothreplacementinearlysarcopterygians
AT rucklinmartin toothreplacementinearlysarcopterygians