Cargando…
Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups accordi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470 |
_version_ | 1783476486959792128 |
---|---|
author | Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Amaral, Marina Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz |
author_facet | Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Amaral, Marina Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz |
author_sort | Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups according to the presence of reinforcing mesh (with or without) and the cantilever length (molar – 15 mm or premolar – 5 mm). The specimens were submitted to strain gauge analysis (30-kgf, 10 s) at different points (molar and premolar). Three-dimensional models were created based on the in vitro specimens, and the results in the bone (microstrain), prostheses (tensile stress), implants and prosthetic screws (von-Mises stress) were evaluated using the finite element method (FEM). All materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linear. Strain gauge data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=.05). FEM results were qualitatively analyzed using colorimetric graphs. RESULTS: The microstrain magnitude for the prostheses with reinforcement was 519.91±359 and 583.33±661 without reinforcement (p=.001). The microstrain values for loading on the molar was 867.49±784 and on the premolar was 235.75±145. FEM corroborated with the in vitro findings for the bone behavior. The load application in the premolar showed reduced stress concentration, and a significant difference was observed between the presence or absence of the reinforcement for the prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Silica-nylon mesh reduced the peri-implant microstrain and the prosthesis stress regardless of the cantilever extension. For temporary complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, the limitation of the cantilever to the premolar region improves the biomechanical response during load application. Key words:Finite element analysis, biomechanical response, dental implants, prosthetic dentistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6894919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68949192019-12-10 Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Amaral, Marina Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups according to the presence of reinforcing mesh (with or without) and the cantilever length (molar – 15 mm or premolar – 5 mm). The specimens were submitted to strain gauge analysis (30-kgf, 10 s) at different points (molar and premolar). Three-dimensional models were created based on the in vitro specimens, and the results in the bone (microstrain), prostheses (tensile stress), implants and prosthetic screws (von-Mises stress) were evaluated using the finite element method (FEM). All materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linear. Strain gauge data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=.05). FEM results were qualitatively analyzed using colorimetric graphs. RESULTS: The microstrain magnitude for the prostheses with reinforcement was 519.91±359 and 583.33±661 without reinforcement (p=.001). The microstrain values for loading on the molar was 867.49±784 and on the premolar was 235.75±145. FEM corroborated with the in vitro findings for the bone behavior. The load application in the premolar showed reduced stress concentration, and a significant difference was observed between the presence or absence of the reinforcement for the prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Silica-nylon mesh reduced the peri-implant microstrain and the prosthesis stress regardless of the cantilever extension. For temporary complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, the limitation of the cantilever to the premolar region improves the biomechanical response during load application. Key words:Finite element analysis, biomechanical response, dental implants, prosthetic dentistry. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6894919/ /pubmed/31824598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Amaral, Marina Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title | Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title_full | Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title_fullStr | Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title_short | Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
title_sort | stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paesjuniortarcisiojosedea stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh AT tribstjoaopaulomendes stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh AT dalpivaamandamariadeoliveira stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh AT amaralmarina stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh AT borgesalexandreluizsouto stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh AT goncalvesfernandadecassiapapaiz stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh |