Cargando…

Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups accordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A., Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes, Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira, Amaral, Marina, Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto, Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470
_version_ 1783476486959792128
author Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A.
Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes
Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira
Amaral, Marina
Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto
Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz
author_facet Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A.
Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes
Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira
Amaral, Marina
Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto
Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz
author_sort Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups according to the presence of reinforcing mesh (with or without) and the cantilever length (molar – 15 mm or premolar – 5 mm). The specimens were submitted to strain gauge analysis (30-kgf, 10 s) at different points (molar and premolar). Three-dimensional models were created based on the in vitro specimens, and the results in the bone (microstrain), prostheses (tensile stress), implants and prosthetic screws (von-Mises stress) were evaluated using the finite element method (FEM). All materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linear. Strain gauge data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=.05). FEM results were qualitatively analyzed using colorimetric graphs. RESULTS: The microstrain magnitude for the prostheses with reinforcement was 519.91±359 and 583.33±661 without reinforcement (p=.001). The microstrain values for loading on the molar was 867.49±784 and on the premolar was 235.75±145. FEM corroborated with the in vitro findings for the bone behavior. The load application in the premolar showed reduced stress concentration, and a significant difference was observed between the presence or absence of the reinforcement for the prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Silica-nylon mesh reduced the peri-implant microstrain and the prosthesis stress regardless of the cantilever extension. For temporary complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, the limitation of the cantilever to the premolar region improves the biomechanical response during load application. Key words:Finite element analysis, biomechanical response, dental implants, prosthetic dentistry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68949192019-12-10 Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A. Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Amaral, Marina Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the presence of a silica-nylon mesh and two cantilever lengths on the biomechanical behavior of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four (24) complete mandibular arch implant-supported prostheses were divided into 4 groups according to the presence of reinforcing mesh (with or without) and the cantilever length (molar – 15 mm or premolar – 5 mm). The specimens were submitted to strain gauge analysis (30-kgf, 10 s) at different points (molar and premolar). Three-dimensional models were created based on the in vitro specimens, and the results in the bone (microstrain), prostheses (tensile stress), implants and prosthetic screws (von-Mises stress) were evaluated using the finite element method (FEM). All materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linear. Strain gauge data were submitted to 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=.05). FEM results were qualitatively analyzed using colorimetric graphs. RESULTS: The microstrain magnitude for the prostheses with reinforcement was 519.91±359 and 583.33±661 without reinforcement (p=.001). The microstrain values for loading on the molar was 867.49±784 and on the premolar was 235.75±145. FEM corroborated with the in vitro findings for the bone behavior. The load application in the premolar showed reduced stress concentration, and a significant difference was observed between the presence or absence of the reinforcement for the prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Silica-nylon mesh reduced the peri-implant microstrain and the prosthesis stress regardless of the cantilever extension. For temporary complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, the limitation of the cantilever to the premolar region improves the biomechanical response during load application. Key words:Finite element analysis, biomechanical response, dental implants, prosthetic dentistry. Medicina Oral S.L. 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6894919/ /pubmed/31824598 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Paes-Junior, Tarcisio-José de A.
Tribst, João-Paulo-Mendes
Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira
Amaral, Marina
Borges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto
Gonçalves, Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz
Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title_full Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title_fullStr Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title_short Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
title_sort stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824598
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56470
work_keys_str_mv AT paesjuniortarcisiojosedea stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh
AT tribstjoaopaulomendes stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh
AT dalpivaamandamariadeoliveira stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh
AT amaralmarina stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh
AT borgesalexandreluizsouto stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh
AT goncalvesfernandadecassiapapaiz stressdistributionofcompletearchimplantsupportedprosthesesreinforcedwithsilicanylonmesh